Dear Sir:
We have had the opportunity now to review your document in
more detail. It is clear how difficult this has been for you and your family
and how committed you are to seek resolution. We have reviewed your demands and
are sorry to have to tell you that we are not the agency to be able to assist
you in meeting them. You have requested:
1. Judicial review, criminal
investigation or Inquiry of conduct of government. The role of the health
authority is to provide health services to the people who live and seek care
within their catchments area. Judicial reviews, criminal investigations and
inquiries are outside of our jurisdiction.
2. Disclosure and correction
of all false information. We are also unable to assist you with this. The
health care services you refer to for your son were provided 10 years ago and
there is no way to obtain second opinions or reassessments so long after the
fact. However, the documents containing your perspective have been attached to
your son's file. As well, the Act you reference is the Children, Family, and
Community Services Act which does not refer to health authority services.
3. Explanation, full, clear formal apology. You referenced the
Ministry of Children and Family Development and the BC Federation of Foster
Parent's Association and the health authority has no jurisdiction over this
Ministry or Agency.
5. Help in leaving Canada. Again, our role is to
provide services to people living and receiving care within Vancouver Coastal
Health and we have no ability to influence people's ability to leave Canada.
We are very sorry that we are unable to assist you with your
concerns. If you are not satisfied with Vancouver Coastal Health Authority's
response to your requests, you may contact the Patient Care Quality Review Board
at this URL http://www.patientcarequalityreviewboard.ca/requestreview.html.
Sincerely,
Darren
________________________________________________
Darren
Kopetsky
Regional Director, Client Relations and Risk Management
Vancouver
Coastal Health
855 12th Avenue West, CP-380
Vancouver BC V5Z
1M9
office:
604-875-4557
________________________________
From: Gambler
[mailto:licitacek@shaw.ca]
Sent: Tue 21/10/2008 9:59 PM
To: Kopetsky,
Darren [VA]
Subject: Re: ULTIMATUM
Thank you, Daren! Acknowledging is everything, and just hours after receiving my
first requests for your help! Thank you! Let's others to proceed with my son's
Care Quality, they know why his physical health is now being ruined on top of
his mental health. Someone else's e-address will replace your.
Thank you!
PS: My identity is # 04746160, ask
correctional services.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kopetsky, Darren [VA]" <darren.kopetsky@vch.ca <mailto:darren.kopetsky@vch.ca>
>
To: "Gambler" <licitacek@shaw.ca <mailto:licitacek@shaw.ca> >
Sent:
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:59 PM
Subject: RE: ULTIMATUM
I
acknowledge receipt of your emails.
Please make clear your identity and
specific complaint or issue you wish to have reviewed, otherwise we will not be
able to proceed. If your request is about multiple individuals, please advise
of the names, birthdates (or personal health numbers), and contact information
for each individual.
Thank
you.
Sincerely
Darren
________________________________________________
Darren
Kopetsky
Regional Director, Client Relations and Risk Management
Patient
Care Quality Office
Vancouver Coastal Health
855 12th Avenue West,
CP-380
Vancouver BC V5Z 1M9
office:
604-875-5845
________________________________
From: Gambler
[mailto:licitacek@shaw.ca]
Sent: Tue 21/10/2008 7:36 PM
To: pat.bell.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:pat.bell.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; patti.marfleet@vancouverpoliceboard.ca
<mailto:patti.marfleet@vancouverpoliceboard.ca>
; Pat.Wolfe@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Pat.Wolfe@gov.bc.ca> ; Patry.B@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Patry.B@parl.gc.ca> ; Paul.Jarman@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Paul.Jarman@gov.bc.ca> ; pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Pearson.G@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Pearson.G@parl.gc.ca> ; Penny.Davies@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Penny.Davies@gov.bc.ca> ; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca> ; Peter.Burton@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Peter.Burton@gov.bc.ca> ; Petit.D@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Petit.D@parl.gc.ca> ; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; VCH
PATIENT CARE QUALITY OFFICE; Philip.Steenkamp@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Philip.Steenkamp@gov.bc.ca>
; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Picard.P@parl.gc.ca> ; Pierrette.Maranda@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Pierrette.Maranda@gov.bc.ca>
; Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca> ; Poilievre.P@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Poilievre.P@parl.gc.ca> ; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; premier@gov.bc.ca <mailto:premier@gov.bc.ca> ; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca> ; Preston.Guno@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Preston.Guno@gov.bc.ca> ; Preston.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Preston.J@parl.gc.ca> ; Priddy.P@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Priddy.P@parl.gc.ca> ; protocol@gov.bc.ca <mailto:protocol@gov.bc.ca> ; Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca> ; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Rachel.Curran@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Rachel.Curran@gov.bc.ca> ;
Rae.B@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Rae.B@parl.gc.ca> ; raj.chouhan.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:raj.chouhan.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca> ; ralph.sultan.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:ralph.sultan.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; randy.hawes.mla@leg.bc.ca
<mailto:randy.hawes.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; Ratansi.Y@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Ratansi.Y@parl.gc.ca> ; rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; rcy@rcybc.ca <mailto:rcy@rcybc.ca> ; Redman.K@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Redman.K@parl.gc.ca> ; Regan.G@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Regan.G@parl.gc.ca> ; Rhiana.Raesler@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Rhiana.Raesler@gov.bc.ca> ;
Reid.S@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Reid.S@parl.gc.ca> ; Rhoda.Garcia@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Rhoda.Garcia@gov.bc.ca> ; rich.coleman.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:rich.coleman.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; Richard.Fyfe@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Richard.Fyfe@gov.bc.ca> ; richard.lee.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:richard.lee.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; richard.neufeld.mla@leg.bc.ca
<mailto:richard.neufeld.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; Richard.Simpson@gov.bc.ca
<mailto:Richard.Simpson@gov.bc.ca>
; Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca> ;
rick.thorpe.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:rick.thorpe.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca> ; rob.fleming.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:rob.fleming.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; Rob.Wood@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Rob.Wood@gov.bc.ca> ; Robert.Adamson@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robert.Adamson@gov.bc.ca> ;
robert.gillen@gov.bc.ca <mailto:robert.gillen@gov.bc.ca> ;
Robert.Goldschmid@gov.bc.ca
<mailto:Robert.Goldschmid@gov.bc.ca>
; Robert.Lapper@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robert.Lapper@gov.bc.ca> ;
Robert.McConnell@gov.bc.ca
<mailto:Robert.McConnell@gov.bc.ca>
; robin.austin.mla@leg.bc.ca
<mailto:robin.austin.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; Robin.Pike@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robin.Pike@gov.bc.ca> ; Robin.Syme@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robin.Syme@gov.bc.ca> ; Rodriguez.P@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Rodriguez.P@parl.gc.ca> ; rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; ron.cantelon.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:ron.cantelon.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; Ronald.Tucker@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Ronald.Tucker@gov.bc.ca> ;
Ron.Kelly@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Ron.Kelly@gov.bc.ca> ; Rota.A@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Rota.A@parl.gc.ca> ; Roy.Hernes@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Roy.Hernes@gov.bc.ca> ; Roy.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Roy.J@parl.gc.ca> ; Russell.Getz@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Russell.Getz@gov.bc.ca> ; Russell.T@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Russell.T@parl.gc.ca> ; russem@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:russem@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; sam.sullivan@vancouver.ca <mailto:sam.sullivan@vancouver.ca>
; Sandra.Griffin@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sandra.Griffin@gov.bc.ca> ;
Savage.M@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Savage.M@parl.gc.ca> ; Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca> ; Scarpaleggia.F@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Scarpaleggia.F@parl.gc.ca>
; Scheer.A@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Scheer.A@parl.gc.ca> ; Schellenberger.G@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Schellenberger.G@parl.gc.ca>
; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Scott.A@parl.gc.ca> ; scott.fraser.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:scott.fraser.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; SG.Minister@gems1.gov.bc.ca
<mailto:SG.Minister@gems1.gov.bc.ca>
; sgpcsb@gems9.gov.bc.ca <mailto:sgpcsb@gems9.gov.bc.ca> ; Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca> ; shane.simpson.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:shane.simpson.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; Shannon.Russell@gov.bc.ca
<mailto:Shannon.Russell@gov.bc.ca>
; Sharon.McKinnon@gov.bc.ca
<mailto:Sharon.McKinnon@gov.bc.ca>
; Shauna.Morgan@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Shauna.Morgan@gov.bc.ca> ;
Sheena.Heuman@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sheena.Heuman@gov.bc.ca> ;
Sheila.OReilly@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sheila.OReilly@gov.bc.ca> ;
Sheila.Stevenson@gov.bc.ca
<mailto:Sheila.Stevenson@gov.bc.ca>
; Sher.Gosling@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sher.Gosling@gov.bc.ca> ; Shipley.B@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Shipley.B@parl.gc.ca> ; shirley.bond.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:shirley.bond.mla@leg.bc.ca>
; sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca> ; Silva.M@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Silva.M@parl.gc.ca>
Subject:
ULTIMATUM
ULTIMATUM TO CANADIAN PUBLIC SERVANTS
End the
coverup of crimes committed against my child and family. We are immigrants,
model parents and citizens who did nothing wrong to you or anyone else, longing
to live in a free and just country. Your colleagues elected or appointed, sworn
and paid to serve, protect, enforce laws or administer justice according laws
and rules regularly do the exact opposite, regardless of oaths, laws, rules,
costs, and consequences. In our case, perpetrators for whole year treated our
child as dangerous pervert, guilty of repeated incestuous sexual assaults.
Insanely obsessed to achieve his criminal conviction, collaborators treated his
parents as cold-hearted beasts, unconcerned and uncaring about our children's
safety, health and well-being, questioning our mental health. At the same time,
we were unquestionably trusted to care for foster children with Special Needs.
We reported to the Ministry for Children and Families that our child was
considering suicide as a remedy to consequences he caused by sexually touching
his sister 3 - 4 times after Halloween. Instead of organizing immediate Suicide
Watch to protect our child's health and life, for whole week many officials
phoned prying questions, solicited unwanted opinions and refused to call later,
when our scared children could not listen. All children were ordered to undergo
humiliating specialist's examination for signs of sexual abuse. After the first
ten days of appalling horrors, we knew that to be safe again, we must leave your
country forever and as soon as possible. Authorities became enraged by our
requests for help beyond any control, determined to silence us at any price.
Some abusers reasonably, in all the circumstances, fear for their safety or the
safety of anyone known to them. To avenge abusers' hurt feelings and reassure
their impunity, Courts of Justice and mental health healers declared me mentally
ill criminal, pushing me into the predicted madness. Haters of the Truth are
determined to sacrifice mine and other people's lives, rather than admit any
injustice. This prize has been accepted by all informed; universal silent
consent proves it beyond any shade of doubt. Some of you accept the possibility
of being hurt or murdered. It is your choice (as my MLA's wife said). Many
unsuspecting citizens and their children are, courtesy of their Government,
exposed to the same risk. Contrary to you, they have no choice, no warning, and
no protection. Start protecting children and families from pig-headed
psychopaths at positions of power morbidly waiting for repeatedly predicted
massacre and murders, confident to avoid own responsibility for not preventing
them. Such creatures should be interned in special institutions indefinitely.
End the mental torture, inflicted by utter contempt for our human and
constitutional rights; like most of our requests for help, they are irrelevant,
unworthy of your attention, action, response, comment. Uphold defiled Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms and disgraced laws, impotent to protect our
rights, health and lives. Let justice be done, though the heavens
fall.
My wife, I and my firstborn son separately immigrated from our
communist homelands, to live together in Freedom, safety and security. After our
daughter and son were born, we became foster parents. Many of our foster
children had Special Needs; some were sexually abused and abusive towards our
own children. After many years of exhausting efforts, and a mere five months
after being united, on December 30, 1997 we reported to our employer that our
oldest child was considering suicide for touching his sister between legs.
Instead of establishing an immediate hospitalization with a Suicide Watch, your
colleagues accused our child to be dangerous pervert guilty of repeated
incestuous sexual assaults and committed criminal negligence. The Deputy of the
Director of Child Protection fabricated the false accusations: "parent not
protecting from abuse", "sexual abuse/exploitation or likelihood by parent."
Horrendous lies, undisclosed to us for one year and four weeks, were fabricated
in spite of a detailed record of our excellent parenting and foster parenting,
conducted by the Ministry for Children and Families to practice informed,
professional decisions in the best interest of children.
The Vancouver
police detective on January 6, 1998 had begun and closed the investigation: "I
found him to be sincere, polite and extremely remorseful. Joseph admitted to
each and every incident. He cried through his entire interview and on several
occasion commented on the pain he has caused his entire family. Fisher was now
considering suicide as a remedy to the problems he had caused. It is obvious to
me that Joseph's family suffered a lot since these incidents. I have spoken with
the agent from the Ministry who agrees with me that Joseph is a very immature
young boy with a lot of mature adult problems. It is my opinion that subjecting
this boy through our Criminal Justice System at this point would only serve to
cause more distress to not only Joseph but his entire family. This is a
situation that warrants a remedy through counseling and therapy. To subject the
accused and his family to anything else would only serve to degrade the
situation more. I have consulted with the Ministry who agree and support my
conclusion. As a result I will be concluding this investigation with no
charges".
The next day the Ministry had begun the "Investigation of
Allegations of Abuse and Neglect in Foster Homes", by the protocol "to be used
by manager upon receipt of any report that a foster parent has sexually abused,
physically or emotionally neglected/abused a child in foster parents care."
False accuser and our resources worker blackmailed us with threats to otherwise
immediately drag away all our children and on January 9, 1998 forced us to sign
the "Voluntary Care Agreement".
The next working day we hand-delivered
first six written requests for help to the first six public servants. We
expected immediate end of the unspeakable injustice, abuse and inhuman cruelty
superimposed upon our family. Experienced perpetrators, however, expect
reasonably to stay above the law, despite the consequences, regardless of whom
and how many times we would seek any help. Thus the first request for help
remains unacknowledged.
More than million requests for help later, all
officials responsible for ruining our lives are free, many of them promoted so
they can for more money commit and cover up more crimes against second-class
citizens' children. Almost eleven years of denied, obstructed, and perverted
justice confirms that covering up lies and crimes against poor children is
entirely normal, fully acceptable, naturally Canadian way of governing over
second class citizens. One response speaks for all: "Quit sending me your
fucking stupid messages.....I could not care less so go away and fuck off!"
A Family Counselor at our child's school on January 14, 1998 offered the
Ministry to do a swift assessment, in her office, at times when our child would
not miss any class, and free of charge. False accuser refused the offer and lied
that we ourselves had asked the Ministry to take our child away and put him into
another school. The same day I reported the criminal acts committed against our
child to the policeman who interrogated him. The policeman did not make any
notes and did not fill any Report. He refused to call our child's teacher as a
witness, but promised to call the false accuser. Neither his, nor her records
show that such call was ever made.
Our Resources worker suggested her
friend, the RSW, MSW, Family and Children's Therapist and Mental Health
Consultant to do the Risk Assessment. He mentally tortured our child in unlawful
State custody until April 16, 1998. He opened his sessions: "the torture is
starting", called our child "TONTO" and threatened him with the long prison
sentence. He prohibited our child to speak with us about his altogether ten,
two-to-three hour long sessions in the kitchen of the foster home. Almost every
time our child missed a whole school day. He repeatedly refused to meet us. Our
resources worker delivered his plan to meet us only after his assessment would
be finished, and his requirements to not spoil his work by asking our child
anything about his sessions. Since the New Year to the end of his first
school-year in Canada, our child was humiliated twice every school day in front
of his classmates, when different cabdrivers obeyed the Ministry's orders to
deliver him from and take him back to an unsafe foster-home.
The M.A.
Child and Family Therapist of the Vancouver Incest & Sexual Abuse Centre on
January 16, 1998 opened the first of six sessions with our daughter. She refused
our presence and our request to videotape her sessions. In her Report about our
daughter's state she lied: "At the time of referral she was reportedly engaged
in temper tantrums, and expressing considerable guilt about getting people in
trouble." At the end of January, our daughter's teacher contacted her: "In
January I heard about what happened between Yosef and Jane from the principal,
as well as from Ms. Fisher. I was amazed as I had not noticed any changes in
Jane's behaviour or emotional state."The Therapist decided to radically change
this state and professionally built false memories.
Psychopaths sworn and
paid to protect the children looked forward to destroy also the life of my only
daughter; for example, the Ministry demanded her interrogation from the VPD
Sexual Offences Unit. Half-year later, when, after reviewing "the reports of
both Enriquez and VISAC", "the police and Crown are reviewing the most
appropriate way to proceed in this matter", our child's last but one social
worker, Registered Master, described the service to be provided beside our
child's emotional torture in unlawful confinement in Canada: "To assist family
with separation and loss."
On February 19, 1998 we received written
result of "Investigating Allegations of abuse and Neglect in Foster Homes" -
blackmail par excellence: "The investigation found no grounds to close your
foster home, or to remove the foster children presently placed with you.
However, some conditions have been placed on this decision: 1) That a third
child will not be placed in your home for the next several months 2) That both
of you attend family counselling, either with VISACS (presently involved) or
with any other agency. 3) That you will be involved and cooperate with the care
plan for Joseph Jr. as determined by the social worker. Shanie RSW Levin, your
resource worker, will continue to provide you with support and consultation.".
The same day we responded with our second hand-delivered request for help. Then
we phoned to the Children's Commission, reporting our child's abuse by the
Ministry and requesting an immediate help.
The first false accuser on
February 23, 1998 confessed: "there is no evidence that the parents are sexually
abusing any child in the home, nor there is evidence that the parents are not
protecting the children", reasoning that "these categories are used due to lack
of more appropriate categories". After the Therapist ruined our child's first
Valentine's Day in Canada, we instructed our lawyer to handle with the Ministry
the end of our consent for that Therapist's participation. We found two Doctors
of Psychology willing to make a swift Risk Assessment. The Ministry refused for
"ethical reasons".
Abused child's teacher on March 2, 1998 begged the
Ministry: "There are two factors in Yosef's life that I know have been constant
sources of encouragement and support: his father, and his stepmother. They are
concerned parents, they are caring parents, and they have been doing a wonderful
job at keeping Yosef as well-organized, calm and happy as possible. Mr. and Ms.
Fisher have done an amazing job at portraying what could be a lifelong scar
instead as positive learning situation. They have done an equally amazing job
with Jane at the same time, from what little I have observed and learned. I look
forward to this boy getting settled back with his parents."
On March 5,
1998 I hand-delivered this and four more support letters to the Resources Team
Manager. She solved our third request for help by ordering us to meet her three
hours later. Then she blackmailed us to undergo our mental health assessment, or
immediately separate us from our last foster children. She already booked two
appointments with some psychiatrist for both of us.
We cancelled the VCA
on March 23, 1998. Our child was not liberated. His social worker and the
Clinical social worker threatened to charge him with sexual assault. We
explained them the Criminal Code exception for sexual interference "no person
aged 12 or 13 years shall be tried" for our child's actions. On Friday April 9,
1998 we refused to sign another VCA. Social workers left our home with threats
that had worked before, and repeated these a few times in front of our children:
that they would return with the police to drag away all our children. For his
first Easter in Canada, our tortured child remained in illegal State custody, I
stayed with our last foster child at home, and my wife with our own children
escaped to the USA.
Our child's teacher on April 13, 1998 begged the
Ministry again: "I feel increased concern for the stress felt by this boy
because he has still not been returned to his home. What are we governmental
figures doing to this child? Please allow him to return to his sister and his
parents. Please return him to his family."
On Tuesday after our child's
first Easter in Canada, when his social worker received the teacher's second
begging letter, the Ministry lawyers and social workers defrauded the Family
Court. with brand-new false accusations. They lied that our child had committed
crime punishable with an imprisonment for a term up to ten years. Our child's
social worker explicitly prohibited him to participate and miss any classes and
obstructed also our presence in the courtroom. Our child and we - model
citizens, parents and foster parents, still caring for the last of many
children, given to our care by the Ministry, then stood in front of the first
Canadian judge we ever saw and waited for justice. We expected no less than The
Right Honourable Chief Justice of Canada: "Judges give effect to our laws and
give meaning to our rights and duties as Canadians. Every judge in Canada is
committed to performing this important role skillfully and impartially.
Canadians should expect no less." Naturally, we were absolutely certain that all
illegal acts would then end, that abusers of our children would be immediately
incapacitated so other public servants would think twice before lying to ruin
other children and families' lives.
Honorable judge refused to hear
anything at all from us. We were not allowed to defend our child against the
malice and cruelty of public servants. She even refused to tell us why, scolding
us instead: "You are wasting the court time". Regardless of the rule of law,
Canadian Constitution and all that crap, the first of Honorable judges joined
all social workers, mental health professionals, policemen, lawyers and
politicians who deny us, obstruct or pervert justice and ruined our child's
childhood, health and life.
On the first day of May 1998, the Ministry
received the Therapist's Report. Nobody was concerned about the lack of a single
psychological test, or that he never contacted any person who knows our child or
us to obtain vitally important information. Judge just four excerpts from his
Report: "Mental Status": "Joseph is Mulatto in appearance. Joseph would benefit
from Penile Plethysmography" (our child told us that his tormentor plans,
together with his friend, to measure our child's erection when watching kiddies'
and other pornography. That is the treatment of consenting pedophiles and sexual
predators who murdered their victims - if they consent). Being a handsome,
charming, friendly, and pleasant youngster, these are attributes that may pose a
risk. I believe Joseph probably should have been charged for sexually touching
his sister." The same day we hand-delivered our child's decision, with our
consent, to return to his homeland.
A few hours later, our child's
teacher faxed a "Personal message" to our MP: "It is about my student, Josef
Fisher-Delis, an immigrant from Cuba. His father is Czech. It does relate to the
prov. Min. of Child/Fam, who are severely hurting his family." And to us: "Mr.
And Ms. Fisher, I will persue Libby. I am certain that she will speak with me. I
will also consult Svend Robinson. They will know what we can do. Please do not
send Josef to Cuba yet. Hold on. It is a terrible struggle, I realize. But for
the health of the boy, he must have hope." To illustrate moral values,
compassion and equality before and under the law, six years later the Honorable
MP stole a $ 65,000.00 worth wedding gift for his homosexual lover. Our
Honorable MP and his lover supportively held him, when crying thief admitted his
theft. Your Honorable colleague served 100 hours of community service, no
criminal record. I got a long one, with correctional services for non-violent
defence of my child's unpardonably violated rights. Malicious stealing
powerless children, breaking families, enjoying good reputation and excessive
salaries for protecting, while senselessly ruining their lives is morally
unpardonable crime.
On May 5, 1998 the Ministry received letter from our
Family Doctor: "Over the years I have dealt with the family on many occasions. I
have always been impressed by the caring and respectful manner in which the
Fishers treat their children. It is impossible to sense any difference in the
care given to their biological versus their foster children. The Fishers are a
very intelligent couple and extremely compliant and conscientious. During these
trying times for Iva and Josef Fisher, their love and compassion for all of
their children has been paramount."
On Mothers' Day, Social workers
apprehended our last foster child from his preschool. After being one family for
over two years, we were not even allowed to give him his clothes, toys and say
good-bye. The Preschool Manager filled a complaint the following day: "It has
been brought to my attention about the situation going on in the Fisher home. I
had no idea and I am very surprised. Not only I was shocked about what happened,
but how it was dealt with by the government officials. We are all professionals
looking out for the best interests of the children so why are they having to
suffer like this? Yesterday, May 7th, my class was interrupted by a Ministry
officials who came in and took Jonah from our room. As for Iva and Josef, these
two people are very caring and loving individuals. I am still in shock over what
this poor family has been suffering through these past four months, although
honestly you would never known it by looking at them. Iva and Josef have got to
be the strongest people I have ever met. Even though their family has been torn
apart and their hearts have been shattered; they still hold up their heads,
smile, and are the best parents they can be. I hope that this mess will be
cleaned up soon and their lives can get back to normal".
The Clinical
Social Worker was the first to voice the collective fears on May 25, 1998: "I
don't trust Enrique Assessment, due to his own lack of qualifications. Fischers'
maliciously attacking workers should be hold accountable for their behavior.
This new situation has come up that's very stressful for them. Mr. Fisher's
ability to cope under stress is questionable. I know we have all been
questioning his mental health. I think he is "a time bomb waiting to explode"
and worry about how that is going to occur." And shared with others her learning
experience how easy is to make from police officers obedient collaborators in
achieving the Ministry goals: "I got throughto Sgt. H . They are reopening the
case. They have to interview both Joe and Jane, which he thinks can start this
week. I told him it is not likely he will be truthful, so he has the reports of
both Enriquez and VISAC. I also let him know my view of the police whether
Joseph was high risk in the first place. It's a learning experience for us
all."
So ashamed the chief of the VPD Sexual Offences Unit and his
detective not to know how deceitful 13 years old habitual rapists are, not
recognize one before own eyes, when interrogating our child! The Children's
Hospital Specialist's report excluding that my daughter's vagina was penetrated
has been irrelevant to the Ministry, though made at their demand. Peace Officers
knew it before interrogating our child.
The facts, laws, health lives,
Truth, everything what police state Governments do not respect must be
disrespected by the Officers. Born into one, we immigrated into another police
state who treats us incomparably, unspeakably worse. Though your Charter
guarrantees to every citizen of Canada the right to enter, remain in and leave
Canada, our child was abused against his and his parents' will in state custody
for 270 days. It is my duty to speak up for Canadian children and for their
parents, victimized beyond the possibility to speak for themselves; till my
death and from beyond the grave.
The day after reviewing "reports of both
Enriquez and VISAC", the detective informed us that our child would be
criminally charged with sexual assault. Everything what the police in police
states does and says should be automatically considered an illegal conduct and
lying, to be taken seriously only when an independent evidence clearly confirms
it. Deadly policies, management and coverup of crimes against my child are an
excellent, made in Canada examples.
After learning that our child would
be criminally charged, on June 3, 1998 the first false accuser falsely accused
me once again, this time of assaulting her ass in a bus. Before exiting the bus,
I said: "Ty kurvo zasrana, tys znicila moji rodinu." She does not understand
Czech, thus the translation ("You filthy whore, you destroyed my family.") is
entirely irrelevant. Accusation that I touched her massive body in any way is
another overwhelmingly repulsive lie. Three witnesses could testify that I had
only a backpack on my back. She however, "noted Mr. Fisher was carrying a
plastic shopping bag which contained several objects, one of which looked like a
large orange or grapefruit. I went directly to my office and made a report to
the police." It is just another evil lie, or delusional perception of reality?
Using from time to time a few words in my language compensates a little public
servants' favorite exploitation of my weak English to completely ignore what
they hear or read. For many reasons, they should seek quick
translation.
Following day the investigating Police Officer fabricated
false evidence in her "Report to Crown Counsel: Proposed Charges; Assault Level
1 266 CCC 1. Did the accused make a statement? NO 2. Was the accused informed at
the time of arrest or detention of the reasons therefore? YES 3. Are the exact
words said to the accused re reasons for arrest or detention as set out below?
YES 4. Was the accused informed at the time of arrest or detention of his right
to retain and instruct counsel without delay? YES 5. Are all circumstances of
the accused's exercise of his right to retain and instruct counsel without delay
as set out below? YES." This Police Officer never met or spoke with me, grossly
violating my legal rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.
On June 17, 1998, the first detective and his superior invited
me to talk. After some good cop, bad cop tricks&threaths, I presented a copy
of the Child, Family &Community Service Act, a copy of the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms, and a long list of our child's grossly violated rights.
We made a deal: quick reunion of my family for the end of complaining and an
apology to two of my child's abusers. I got a nice enlightenment about the
Charter: "All this is a bullshit!" As if I didn't know! I did my part.
The police acted with truly Canadian honor, honesty, values, ethic, love
of the law and order, equality before and under the law, you know all that BS of
yours. This is a window of excellent opportunity to join our Family Doctor and
teachers of our children and present yourself as yet another compassionate,
decent Canadian. If you feel sorry for my child, please, copy: I AM SORRY into
my blog, to show that, beside guys I know from my frequent imprisonments and
bums from Wreck Beach, other Canadians are capable of compassionate acts. If you
feel safe only when nobody is watching, please, send it from some library or an
internet cafe. You can make a huge difference in many lives, including yours.
THANK YOU.
The Crown Counsel Query from June 24, 1998: "I didn't think
there was sufficient evidence to lay assault charge. However, I have laid an
810. Please, obtain statements from the two community professionals who rec'd
comments from Fisher about Laycock. This will better the evidence of the grounds
for her fear. Also, please obtain a copy of the letter Fisher wrote to Laycock
after this incident" I wrote her nothing since the second requests for help,
but called Miss Laycock the morning after making a deal with the police, leaving
an apologetic message to save my child's vacations at Cuba, promised to him and
to his relatives, falling into the police's entrapment of false
promise.
During his first summer vacation in Canada, our child, instead
of visiting his family and homeland, was still unlawfully detained in a second
foster home. The Honorable Attorney General, whose help we sought from March 31,
1998 urged us on June 30, 1998 for the first time: "If you have any evidence
that a crime has been committed, I would urge you to bring that evidence to the
attention of the police in the jurisdiction where the alleged crime took place."
The Law-enforcement Officer No.1 knew, or should know, that I had brought enough
evidence to the attention of the police on January 14, 1998.
Six officers
of the Ministry for Children and Families with our two obedient Peace Officers
organized the Integrated Case Management Plan on July 8, 1998. Our devoted
child's teacher accepted our unending requests for her help. We met our child
there, delivered by his second foster parent. The courageous teacher repeated
her offer, which had been ignored since April: to rent a room to my son and me
in her house, so our child could spend at least the rest of his first Canadian
summer vacation with at least one parent. The Ministry refused, explaining that
it cannot be done without a Study if she and her house are acceptable by the
Ministry's standards. Conspirators then planned, with usual cruelty in front of
our child: "There was a brief discussion regarding the option available to the
police in this case. The two options discussed were Diversion and recommending
that the crown approve charges. Tom and Axel pointed out that it was not usual
in cases of sexual assault involving force to use the diversion option. The
police and Crown are reviewing the most appropriate way to proceed in this
matter". Present was also some not Spanish speaking member of the Law Society
from Victoria, the Government lawyer appointed to represent our child. We of
course sought for months a Spanish speaking one. It did not matter; he objected
nothing, not speaking at all. When he was leaving, we asked him what he thinks.
And he thought that not our son, but our daughter should be parented by the
Ministry.
The next day the Ministry started coaxing a Forensic
Psychologist into their conspiracy to make a criminal from our child, based at
Enrique and VISAC's Reports. And the day after that, our child's social worker
and Clinical Supervisor noted in their "Summary: Dr. Adams has considerable
experience working with youth who have sexually offended. After receiving the
Director's material about this offence, Dr. Adams believes Yosef should have
been charged after the offence; he has stated that the only effective treatment
is available through the criminal justice system and; Dr. Adams concurs with the
Director's view that the child should be living outside the home away from the
victim." That would be true only if Enrique, VISAC's, Police and Crown Reports
were truthful facts and not the most malicious lies, fabricated to achieve
criminal conviction of our extremely emotionally abused child, illegally
detained in Canada.
On August 6, 1998 the Ministry received the Dr.
Adams' professional Risk Assessment, overdue since December 30, 1997: "Yosef
wishes to return home and his parents concur. They feel prepared to protect all
of their children from similar incidents in the future. Letters were reviewed
which showed much respect for the parents parenting skills and love for their
children, and for Yosef's generally good character. I do not recommend charging
him with the sexual acting out before a Youth Court. I recommend that he is
permitted to return home, once appropriate precautions are taken, such as the
door alarm and other common sense considerations." A common sense was used the
last time on January 6, 1998: "To subject the accused and his family to anything
else would only serve to degrade the situation more. I have consulted with the
Ministry who agree and support my conclusion."
The best social workers
who maintain the best interest of their clients as the primary professional
obligation are entitled RSW. Their Board's investigator on August 14, 1998
determined that: "Mr. and Mrs. Fisher were so threatened by Mr. Alvarez's report
and recommendations that they desperately sought to destroy him rather than face
the seriousness of the issues. It is my observation that he acted professionally
and ethically, with his clients' best interest at heart. It is my finding that
at no time did RSW Alvarez and RSW Levin act unprofessionally or unethically in
carrying their duties." This professional was for her achievements during the
next five years promoted new member of their totally corrupt Board.
On
the last week of our child's summer vacation, his social worker blackmailed us
to voluntarily sign a Supervision Order for the next six months. Would we
refuse, our child would suffer in illegal state custody for the next 183 days,
on top of the 270 days of time served. Before signing it, on August 27, 1998 I
publicly warned the blackmailer to kill anyone who would try to abduct my
children again. With childhood hobby of manufacturing explosives and pipe-bombs,
once teaching to kill non-commissioned officers at Army Academy, with powerful
motive to kill abusers of my child, my warning should bring offenders and their
helpers to senses long time ago.
Criminals who ruined the lives of my
child and family served zero hours for their crimes altogether. For my efforts
to save our child's life from being totally destroyed, I have so far served 243
days of correctional services and received 32 days and nights of professional
care about my mental health. The Public servants' cruelty and malice that the
Government enforced against our child is universally accepted, as well as
endlessly repeated lies and locking me in prisons and mental health
institutions, because some addressees of our requests for help reasonably, in
all the circumstances, fear for their safety or for the safety of anyone known
to them.
I filled my first complaint against the police on September 15,
1998. The next day, Tom for a first time arrested me. Without a Warrant. An
Impostor impersonating the Justice of Peace tricked me to sign an "Undertaking":
no contact with the first false accuser and the last blackmailer.
The
next day, Crown Counsel counseling with the last blackmailer, conceded: "I would
be upset too if my child was taken away." Following day, the last blackmailer
called "back to Crown Counsel to let her know I was not happy with the way she
treated me - making it look like I had done something wrong. She apologized and
stated that she was frustrated with the police and their procedures in how they
handled this".
On September 21, 1998 I found in my Particulars the
original Ministry lie in the Crown Counsel Report #98-207953: Evidence of
Berggren-Clive, Kathy: "This witness will testify that; Josef Fisher had been
removed from the home several months earlier as a result of sexual assault
investigation which determined that Josef Fisher had sexually assaulted his
seven year old step-sister on a number of occasions in the family home over a
six months period". Crown counsels further disseminated that our child is
disgusting pervert guilty of repeated incestuous sexual assaults: "Joseph Fisher
was interviewed and admitted to the police that he had in fact sexually
assaulted his younger sister over a period of approximately 6 months. The reason
that Josef Fisher was not charged at the time of the incident was partly because
he is the product of a relationship that his father had been involved in several
years ago in Cuba, prior to his present marriage." New conspirators fabricated
evidence that Tom "conducted an investigation and determined that there was
sufficient evidence to support a criminal charge of Section 271 C.C.C. Sexual
Assault."
Presenting the most malicious lies about our child as
undisputable facts, crown counsels stated that "Josef Fisher had sexually
assaulted his seven year old step-sister on a number of occasions in the family
home over a six months period." Six months before we reported inappropriate
touching and Ministry fabricated the original lie, our child was looking forward
to live in that beautiful, rich, friendly and free country he knew from his
visit four years ago. He was looking forward to live happily with his Canadian
family in mere thirty-five days. He was promising his friends and family nice
presents made in Canada, to deliver them the next vacations. Nobody knew he had
the last six months of free, happy and healthy life ahead. With the most
malicious lies about him, public servants ruined my child's health and life,
causing him incapable to see his homeland and Cuban family
again.
Preschool Manager registered her second complaint to Quality
Assurance Manager on October 21, 1998: "I wish that all of this torture to the
Fishers family would end. This is an amazing family who loves each other very
much. I hope you can do something to help them bring their family back together
again." Clinical social worker, Network Manager and Resources Team Manager
immediately solved it: like our child's courageous teacher, courageous Preschool
manager was by her superiors reprimanded for obstructing the Ministry's
protection of our children.
On December 16, 1998 we hand-delivered our
child´s third Formal Complaint to the Quality Assurance Manager. Clarke ended
the complaint resolution process that day, but waited a whole week, until
Christmas Eve, to fax us her "Final Report" . The day before that, a Dr. of
Psychology who inspired our child's first complaint, for the last time checked
that the alarm works well every time our child opened his door.
On
January 4, 1999, Honorable Attorney General urged us again: "Your concerns about
Andrea Clarke and the social workers should be directed to my colleague, the
Honourable Lois Boone, Minister of Children and Families, or her designate. In
making enquiries on your behalf, my staff have been advised that Minister Boone
or her delegate will be responding to your concerns, if this has not already
occurred. Whenever an individual has reason to believe that someone has been
involved in criminal activity, the proper course of action is for that
individual to report their allegations to the police. It is the responsibility
of the police to conduct investigations. I regret that I am unable to provide
further assistance in this matter."
Two days after the Honorable
Attorney General regretted his inability to provide further assistance, the
Honorable Minister for Children and Families responded: "I would ask you to work
with Andrea Clarke and her staff in the complaint resolution process that has
begun."
Justices of Peace during the November, December and January
refused to accept our "Information" about crimes committed against our child.
The last time we tried, the Justices of Peace sent us to the police. The
Detective who never annulled his threats to criminally charge our child, did not
prepare any Report, did not make notes, and refused to investigate the crimes
committed against our child too. It was clear to them that we did not have good
evidence. But the next day, we finally received the thoroughly censored files
about us. Though tens of pages are partially or entirely empty, someone leaked
enough evidence for a scandal of unprecedented proportions.
For example,
on January 6, 1999, the same day that the Honorable Minister asked us to work
with Clarke, this Minister's Office superbly appraised Clarke's accomplishments:
"Thank You, Andrea, I appreciate your taking the time this afternoon to with
myself and staff from Child Protection Division regarding the Fisher case. I am
thoroughly impressed with the steps that you and your staff have taken in
attempting to address this family concerns. In fact, I would say that your
actions have been above and beyond what would normally be expected! Your staff,
both in the regional and field offices, have been required to deal with a string
of inflammatory and harsh accusations. Such comments and accusations would weigh
heavily on the confidence in staff to do the work required and only add to the
already high level of stress that social workers face. On behalf of the
Ministers' office, I would like to express appreciation for a job well done.
Thank you again!" After testifying in two malicious prosecutions for seeking
justice, Andrea was promoted to the Child Protection Mediation Program Manager,
Dispute Resolution Office, Ministry of Attorney General.
In his Report to
Crown Counsel, Tom described his actions after he refused to investigate the
reported crimes: "So concerned about the mental state of the accused this
witness approached his immediate supervisor and his officer in charge and
advised them of the state of mind of the accused and the volatility that the
accused was presently subject to. It is this witness honest belief that the
accused is presently capable of any violent act at this point made and to
achieve the goals to change the system." Ten days later, on January 5, 1999 the
Deputy of Chief Constable set another police entrapment: "Your complaints
regarding specific social workers should be taken up with the Ministry of
Children and Families."
On February 12, 1999 I was for a second time
arrested for faxing our requests for help to the Ministry of Children and
Families, this time with a Warrant. We became a tiny casualty of the system and
the deadly policies that protect the murderers of 50 000 Native children killed
in the Residential Schools and hospitals. My child's abusers faxed among
themselves: "one of the social workers in this office asked me what we can do
about safety because he is a chemist and may make a bomb. I had not heard that
Mr. Fisher was a chemist had you?" Then another round: "Debbie left me a voice
mail last night saying that she he was a chemist. I am advise Detective Jette."
Around that time enraged Jette broke the taboo and spilled the beans: "BUT WE
KNOW WHAT CRIMES WE CAN INVESTIGATE AND WHAT CRIMES WE CANNOT!" This simple and
natural knowledge is the most effective warrant that many serious crimes would
never be prevented, investigated and punished.
To ensure their own
impunity, public servants consult together and develop a collaborative approach
to the cover up. For example, six days after my second arrest, the Children's
Commission informed Clarke: "To ensure Yosef's best interest in bringing the
complaint to resolution, the Children's Commission Complaints Officer, the
regional Quality Assurance Advisor and the Advocate for Child, Youth and
Families will consult together to develop a collaborative approach to this."
On March 16, 1999 Crown Counsel to my defence lawyer: "Should your
client enter a guilty plea, the Crown would seek a further period of
incarceration of approximately 1 month, and a three year probation period".
Murphy disclosed perpetual governments' desire and objective of our family
persecutions: "The conditions requested by Crown would be as follows: not to
send any faxes or letters to any ministry of Social services worker or office.
Please be reminded that in the event this matter goes to trial, Crown will be
entering background evidence of letters to various members of the Ministry prior
to the dates over which the charge spans."
On March 17, 1999
independent of government and political parties Ombudsman to our child: "we are
writing to again confirm that our Office is not investigating your complaints
about the Ministry for Children and Families at this time. Finally, we would
again to confirm that our Office may conduct an investigation of a review by the
Children's Commission."
The collaborative Honorable judge decided: "I am
not deciding whether or not the actions of the Ministry through its agents were
appropriate or inappropriate", and let me rot in jail for three months without
bail. When His Honor finally released me on bail, I stayed imprisoned for the
falsified "Undertaking" until I signed, among other conditions, "no
communication by telephone, telegrams, computer, e-mail, including television,
media, newspaper and radio until this matter is concluded." The Court of Law
again ensured public servants they are free to break laws, abuse rights and ruin
health and lives of poor children, with impunity and regardless of the rule of
law, Canadian Constitution and all that crap.
On August 11, 1999
Children's Commissioner finally have had the opportunity to carefully review all
the complaints to CC since March, 1998: "I have had the opportunity to carefully
review all the complaints which you have filed with the Commission commencing in
March, 1998. I have determined that the Commission will now directly and
promptly address the complaints. The request that I send evidence of alleged
criminal behaviour to the RCMP is denied. Your request that I conduct a special
investigation into this matter is also denied. This matter is appropriately
addressed through the complaint process. The Child, Youth and Family Advocate
will be given notice of this complaint and is invited to participate on the
review." The justice for powerless children and families similarly victimized by
public servants sworn and paid to protect them is also denied.
My
efforts to expose and limit public servants' crimes against children diagnosed
many professionals with many symptoms of many mental illnesses (delusions of
persecution with narcissistic, obsessive, compulsive and antisocial traits,
delusion of grandeur, altered thought process, decreased insight, potential for
violence, aggression, self-harm, rigid thinking, attention seeking, possible
substance abuse) and many disorders (Paranoid Personality with Delusional
Disorder, Antisocial Personality Disorder, and Borderline Personality Disorder).
And perpetrators who ruined our lives and their protectors for almost eleven
years perfectly manifest psychopathic traits (total disregard for and violation
of the rights of others, deceitfulness, repeated lying, reckless disregard for
safety of others, cruelty, failure to accept personal responsibility for own
acts, lack of concern for the suffering of others, lack of guilt, empathy,
remorse).
Closely study prima facie evidence of committed crimes. Listen
to the Audio Tape (go to the right corner of my blog) "THESE CRIMES ARE NOT
GOING TO BE INVESTIGATED!" I was arrested at the end of that interrogation, once
again without any warrant, but firstly under the Mental Health Act. Without any
Court Order, the State detained me among seriously mentally ill people, without
any treatment (except being involuntarily drugged three times), because the
police instructed mental health professionals to do so.The Head of the Intensive
Psychiatric Care Unit evaluated the "Risk Assessment" on February 2, 2000: From
the standpoint of risk, I believe that this man is quite capable of carrying out
disastrous act in the community if, in his perception, the complaints that he
and his wife have logged over the last two years are not dealt with."
At the Eve before our child's 15th Birthday and Children's Commission's
Hearing, my wife received via courrier the "SUMMONS: YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ATTEND
as a witness at the place, date and time mentioned below, and to bring with you
and produce all audio tapes and tape recording touching in any way on the
complaint about the child. In particular, you are required to bring all such
audio tapes and tape recording pertaining to conversations with social workers
in this matter."
On May 25, 2000 the police Inspector set another
entrapment: "Recently, you have been advised by Telus Corporation, acting on
behalf of the Vancouver Police Board, to desist from using your Fax to send
large volumes of same issue correspondence. First, that you are wasting your
personal resources and the time of the agencies references by sending such
material and, second, that if in fact you have relevant issues, then the same
should be directed to the Ministry Of Child and Family Services."
Telus
disconnected our phone for one week. Three weeks after setting the latest police
entrapment, The National Security Investigation, Vancouver police and Criminal
Profiler and Associate Professor of Clinical and Forensic Psychology
reccomended: "to have him sign a contract acknowledging that if he violates it,
he will be charged with Criminal harassment." Experts elaborated the imminent
danger: "It is clear that FISHER is not going to go away. It is possible that
stress and pressure can cause a person to become mentally ill." They were right:
the ever-present and overwhelming stress and pressure indeed caused our child to
become mentally ill.
For trying to reduce the unspeakable injustice,
abuse and inhuman cruelty superimposed upon our family, liars and their
collaborators hate me so intensely they patiently wait for me to commit suicide,
even a mass-murder, rather than admit any error. Authors of the "Threat
Assessment" consensed: "There is a HIGH RISK that FISHER will carry out an act
of violence against any person who, at that point in time, he feels is
significantly interfering with his life. There is also a HIGH RISK that, if he
attempts suicide, he will try to take someone with him. FISHER obviously feels
justified in his course of action and he has the ability to carry out his
threats. The act of writing and sending faxes is an outlet for FISHER for the
moment. As long as he sees alternatives to violence, he will utilize them. The
risk would increase dramatically if the contact stops."
Just three
months later, on September 14, 2000 the imminent danger increased dramatically:
Honorable Minister for Youth prohibited us to fax him anything. He hang up with
a grave threat: if we fax anything to him, our phone would be disconnected. We
called back two minutes later and reached his answer machine. In spite of not
faxing a single dot to the Honorable Minister, our phone was two hours later
permanently disconnected. Three weeks after dramatically increasing the high
risk of lost lives, the Honorable Minister was promoted to third Attorney
General.
Tom's superiors ordered to arrest me Without Warrant on January
18, 2001. Tom again transported me in handcuffs, again in an unmarked car, this
time with another guy driving. Before throwing me into jail once again, Tom for
a few seconds silently stood with his back toward me, in his shirt, though the
temperature was below zero and he had a jacket in the car until he get out. With
ominous silence from both guys, I was looking directly at Tom's exposed gun.
Charges: Criminal harassment, Breach of probation, Uttering threats. To be
released on bail five days later, I had no choice but to sign "Not to
communicate by electronic Mail or fax with any office or employee of the
Ministry for Children and Family Services." Crown counsels unsuccessfully
requested an absurd condition: that also my wife is forbidden to communicate
with the Ministry in any way. Because her daily sent written requests for help
and phone calls were ignored like before, after a few days I started sending my
requests for help to government agencies including the Ministry again.
On
May 25, 2001 the police Inspector who set the latest entrapment, solved the
latest complaint with newest threat: "It is clear that the psychiatrists who
examined you at hospital following your arrest agreed with the non-medical
assessment of the respondents who arrested you. Such agreement is reflected in
the fact you were subsequently accommodated at a mental health facility for
thirty days. Many social and government agencies have been made privy to your
grievance through tens of thousands pages mailed, faxed and otherwise delivered
documents citing your grievance. Unfortunately, following your release from the
referenced institution - and in spite of many previous requests and warnings to
cease sending your documents - you renewed such activity with increased vigour
and vituperation. You have been warned by police on 2001-February-23 to desist
from continuing to re-offend, or you will be liable to a third arrest."
Fourth Attorney General acknowledged our requests for his help: "Dear
Josef and Iva Fisher: Thank you for your letter of September 16, 2001. As the
issues you raise fall under the purview of the Minister of Children and Family
Development, I have taken the liberty of forwarding your correspondence to the
Honourable Gordon Hogg".
Dramatically high risk of lost lives is
universally accepted by everyone informed. Another Honorable judge reasoned,
just before sending me into prison once again: "social workers were doing the
best they could do."
On September 27, 2002 the Honorable Chief Judge of
the BC Provincial Courts admitted: "I am unable to assist you with your
concerns." One week after the Honorable Chief Judge admitted her inability, the
Ministry offered to help us with the last of our five demands. We insisted at
all our demands must be dealt with.
On December 4, 2002 I was arrested
for the 9th time, this time with a warrant. Because I "between the 19th day of
August, 2002 and the 25th day of November, 2002, while bound by a probation
order made by The Honorable judge Weitzel, on the 17th day of April, 2002, did
without reasonable excuse fail to comply with such order by contacting members
of the Ministry for Children and Families, contrary to section 733.1 of the
criminal Code of Canada."
To ensure my attendance in court proceedings,
the Honorable judge denied me any bail. But since Honorable judge refused to
accept my one page long written Statement, the rest of court proceedings
nevertheless proceeded in my absence. After a few secret hearings I was without
any explanation or conditions released after seventy-eight days of correctional
services in maximum security prison. The next morning, on February 19, 2003
administrators of justice proceeded with another secret hearing in my absence,
further conspiring how to buy our conscience. This outrageous attempt to buy our
silence remains the only attempt to close our case peacefully.
I
inquired from all my mates receiving correctional services in Maximum Security
Prisons the quality of foster care most Canadian prisoners lived through.
Honesty is the best policy, they knew we met courtesy of social workers who
stole my child. One horror story after another. Yet many of them, once or twice,
were accepted, as every child should be, being soon kicked out from that safe
place by his social worker. Most of them have an excellent sense of justice,
totally absent in public servants' minds and acts. Not your justus, but
balanced, quid pro quo justice, trying to give the society back what they got.
Impossible task, nothing can balence the child's life ruined by psychopaths paid
for doing it.
On March 14, 2005 I once again sought help from the
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. My previous attempts to speak with someone
from the CBC always ended with the receptionists' instructions to leave my
documents there, with the same promise - that someone would soon contact me.
Years passed, but nobody has yet found the time to do so.
That day, at
1:30 pm, I e-mailed the latest request for help to 294 addressees. This request
for help is the first article of my blog. At 2:10 PM I hand-delivered the same
request for help to the CBC receptionist. I was completely ignored for one hour.
Then someone gave me back my request for help. He explained that nobody will
accept my request for help, because of a threat: "THIS IS AN EMERGENCY!!! If
ignored, I will sacrifice my life - set myself on fire to achieve some Justice."
The warning was used so the public would finally know and examine the evidence
that public servants commit crimes against children even at the price of lost
human lives.
Then followed the emergency response: I was sitting in front
of the CBC, holding an open bottle and two lighters. Nobody attempted to
communicate with me in any way, let alone to negotiate. I ended this
embarrassing theatre after about twenty minutes. I closed the bottle and went
back to the empty, but unlocked CBC building. Nothing happened. I walked back,
towards the ERT. I ignored the ERT's orders to kneel in front of them - I would
rather die standing, than to kneel in front of a Pig. Peace Officers discovered
a binder in my backpack, labelled with big letters: "SHORT AND INCOMPLETE
REPORT. PUBLIC OFFICERS' CRIMES AGAINST OUR FAMILY 31/12/97 -TODAY." All this
was witnessed by many CBC employees, their visitors and bystanders. A lot of
them recorded the heroic ERT response with their cameras.
Canadians have
the right to know how rotten, deceitful and pitiless the reputable pillars of
their society are. Citizens have the right to know whom they gave the right to
govern over them, whom they gave confidence and power to serve and protect their
children and their rights, freedoms, safety, security, health and lives. The
media responded with the first public comment:
"Attention-Seeker"
Arrested After CBC Incident
Mar, 14 2005 - 4:00 PM
VANCOUVER(CKNWAM980)--Vancouver Police had to send the Emergency Response Team
Monday afternoon, after a man threatened to light himself on fire at the CBC
Plaza in downtown Vancouver. Just after 3 PM, the man entered the foyer of the
building on Hamilton Street carrying a one-litre bottle of some flammable
liquid, paper and a number of cigarette lighters. Insp. Bob Rolls says the ERT
managed to take the man down before he hurt himself or others. Rolls says he
suspects the man just wanted some attention. "I think he's going through
something to do with a family break-up situation, and he was despondent about
that.' Rolls says this man has been struggling with mental health issues, and
they have dealt with him before".
It was the same in my then communist
homeland; governments, police, courts of law and media served the reality and
facts to the public with equal accuracy and truthfulness, with equal respect for
human rights and lives. Law-enforcement forces knew what crimes they cannot
investigate and prosecute, media knew what crimes they cannot announce and
denounce. Criminals knew what crimes they can commit and their victims knew that
seeking justice results in additional crimes. Public servants with the same
"morality" and the same "ethic" persecuted and locked their critics in prisons
and lunatic asylums. And newspapers lied to the public the same way. But public
servants abusing powers to cover up organized child abuse like their Canadian
soul mates - that's too absurd; it is unthinkable. When the police regime
collapsed, most criminals were fully or partially amnestied. Exempted were only
the most despicable types - abusers of power and child abusers.
Most
children in our care were of native origin. Six of them were abused or neglected
so seriously that the most disruptive method was in their best interest.
Thirteen other children were senselessly abused and traumatized. We regularly
met and closely observed their parents. In their cases not brutal, but much
cheaper, entirely safe and efficient methods were not considered at all.
The chances that ordinary Canadian children and families can
successfully defend their rights, health and lives against similar cruelty and
malice is absolute zero, considering our excellent work for the Ministry for
Children and Families. Native origin, the wrong accent, wrong color and other
"disabilities" are aggravating factors.
In your police state, most
lately the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is serving pedophiles, sadists
and murderers (many fresh ones prosper as foster parents) of native children to
escape justice. "It's the official posture of the government of Canada that the
word genocide will not be used in connection with the residential school
truthandreconciliation process. But genocide is exactly what it was, and until
that truth is recognized, reconciliation remains impossible." (Ward
Churchill)
A psychiatrist in charge at St. Paul Hospital diagnosed me
"paranoid & delusional" and kept me there for almost 24 hours. The next
psychiatrist in charge hastily released me, without any paperwork, maybe because
he knows me since my first evening in State Custody. In the meantime, another
gang of Peace Officers lied to my wife that I told them my plans to kill her and
all our children, and some social worker offered my family a safe house. My wife
declined such generosity.
On April 4, 2005 the sixth Honorable Minister
for Children and Families Development acknowledged for a first time our requests
for his help: "Please remove me from your distribution list. Thank you." And two
weeks after that: "I have asked before and will kindly ask again. Please CEASE
e-mailing this account. Both Josef AND Iva Fisher. If you would like to send in
correspondence, please do so. Thank you." We informed the Honorable Minister
that any communication in writing IS the correspondence and he ended all
communication.
On November 17 2005, on the Night of the Police Awards
and the 15th Anniversary of our wedding, a gang of Peace Officers and one
Officer of the Ministry forced their entry into our home without any warrant.
They were hunting a suicide-bomber, who had reportedly uttered threats in the
Honorable Attorney General's Constituency Office. Courtesy of the police, it is
known that the sixth Honorable Minister for Children and Families Development
consulted this little incident with the fifth Honorable Attorney General.
The police imprisoned my son for an outstanding warrant on January 9,
2007. I gave my son's lawyer a request to the Honorable judge before a hearing
ten days later: "Beside just punishment, however, Yosef also deserves
psychologist's professional help, which we request. Otherwise, he will never
achieve his dreams to make living as an artist and useful member of society. In
spite of our superhuman efforts, and due to circumstances beyond our control,
our child is now a homeless drug addict with criminal record and ruined
life."
When my son got another lawyer, I repeated the same request.
Nothing happened. Our child was kept in the solitary confinement. Because of
utter lack of any mental health help during his forty-eight days of
imprisonment, I paid the bail on February 26, 2007. Correctional officers knew
that something was terribly wrong: instead of releasing our child from prison,
the guards transported him to a nearby hospital. The police twice tasered our
child exactly one week later, and transported him to the Vancouver General
Hospital. Now he lives in a Group Home. Professionals gave my first-born child
the responsibility to never let me enter that house. Our athletic child who had
been in excellent physical shape, gained more than one hundred pounds during his
first eight months there. And the voices in his head are more frequent and more
troublesome.
Mental health professionals carry on this national
tradition to harm second class citizens and their children regardless of the
Hippocratic Oath and all that crap. Learn more from the book "Hidden from
History - The Canadian Holocaust": Under the guise of tuberculosis treatment,
generations of native children and adults were subjected to medical experiments
and sexual sterilizations at hospitals. Hospitals stored children's bodies from
the residential schools. Abortions were performed on native girls who were made
pregnant at the school by staff and clergy, and newborn babies were disposed of.
Thousands of victims of public servants' crimes are afraid to seek
justice, and millions of their fellow citizens pretend the confidence in the
government. Every nation has the government and media it deserves. Almost
eleven years of teaching public servants how to serve and protect, instead of to
ruin or terminate poor children's lives over and over again, is the hardest and
most important work of our lives, so far absolutely unsuccessful.
We
requested any help in writing from more than one thousand and three hundred
public servants or agencies; more than a million times. In my blog you will
find some copies of some responses and important excerpts from other written
responses. For an overwhelming majority of addressees and readers, our requests
for their help are unworthy of any response. All others either ignore, or repeat
old and fabricate additional lies, helping liars for almost eleven years to
escape justice. Because all informed public servants betrayed us, we seek help
from our fellow citizens with the help of the internet since the first public
comment.
At morning on March 19, 2007 I politely distributed copies of
the first media comment from March 14, 2005, with a little addendum, to
employees and visitors of the CBC Head Quarters. Soon the police arrested me,
and at the requests of some of the CBC agents, Peace Officers took my picture
for the CBC use. After a long communication with superiors they called an
Ambulance, and transported my possessions in their car to St. Paul Hospital. I
was committed for a couple of hours, until the psychiatrist from my first arrest
arrived. After a 2-3 minutes long assessment, without any paperwork, he released
me. Thieves stole my buss pass and home keys and accused the paramedics of being
responsible for the loss, though all seized items were transported in their
cruiser. The CBC is one of uninterested addressees of this ULTIMATUM. To be
salable, news must be both new and interesting, truthfulness is irrelevant.
The VPD Insp. on August 4, 2008, confirmed reading the Subject:
ULTIMATUM TO CANADIAN PUBLIC SERVANTS. One week later, a Det/Cst wrote: "I am
currently reviewing all available materials on your blog to familiarize myself
with your case. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions." On September
24, 2008 at 5:51PM, the Det/Cst wished me: "Good day Mr. Fisher, I have read the
contents of your blog posted at http://fcase.blogharbor.com <http://fcase.blogharbor.com/> . If
you are interested, I would still like to meet you in person to discuss this
further with you. Please advise at your convenience." My immediate response:
"Good evening Det/Cst Lowe, You certainly worked long hours overtime to read and
comprehend it all. As you have read, the last time another VPD Det/Cst invited
me to discuss this further and incarcerated me for 30 days in Lunatic Asylums.
Without any court order, as you also have read. You too may be tempted to do
something illegal. To prevent it, and if you are interested, sent me all
questions you want to discuss. I will answer them as best as I can, as soon as
possible, if still possible. Just tell your supervisor who ordered you to
communicate with me that I want his/her name and signature under these
questions, if she/he likes to know my answers." For years, the same offer is an
important part of our requests for help.
My wife was on September 26,
2008 greatly surprised with following e-mail: "We received a report from the
Vancouver Police Department acting on behalf of the owner of the email addressswill@direct.ca <mailto:addressswill@direct.ca>
<mailto:swill@direct.ca <mailto:swill@direct.ca> > . The owner of
this email address has allegedly sent cease and desist requests in the past
asking that no further emails be sent to it. The owner claims that the emails
continue and we have an example of one such message. The police have asked that
we contact you directly so as to resolve this issue as peacefully and easily as
possible We ask that Mr. Joseph Fisher refrain from any further email
communications with the email address swill@direct.ca <mailto:swill@direct.ca> . Future complaints
regarding unwanted email communications from any email address using your
internet connection could possibly result in legal action by the complainant(s)
on the grounds of harassment and termination of internet services by Shaw
Cable." The owner was appointed to the Police Board on June 30, 2008, the
contact address accessible from the "Safe Streets - Safe Cities" internet
report. Tired of waiting for the most efficient and the most shocking solution?
Is the explanation for your role in allowing it happen plausible? Then go ahead,
cowards!
Like Police Officers, all others after a good sleep, determined
to sacrifice mine and other people's lives, rather than admit any injustice,
daily enjoy excellent reputations and obscenely high salaries, with pleasant
assurance that all together are equally corrupt law-breaking scoundrels, safe
from unpleasant consequences. Guardians of the Constitution, our fellow
citizens, lovers of the law and order, champions of children's rights, Free
speech and justice, singers guarding your Canada, what if tomorrow is too late
to do the right thing? End deadly policies. Choose Life. Or, shake your
blood-stained hands with psychopaths who never tried to eliminate, but calmly
wait for repeatedly predicted violent deaths.
And bear the
consequences.
Our Demands:
1. Judicial reviews, criminal
investigation or Inquiry into Conduct of Government [CCC, Inquiry Act S.1]
2. Disclosure and correction of all false information [FOIPPA S.2 (b),
CF&CSA s. 76 (5) (b)]
3. Explanation, full, clear, formal apology
[MCF Policy Manual IV iii)]
4. Letter of acknowledgment of our excellent
fostering services [Agreement of the MCF & BCFFPA]
5. Help us leave
your stolen cursed land on Compassionate, Humanitarian, or any grounds you wish,
ASAP.
What will YOU do? How can you accept your salaries and do
nothing to protect the public and prevent dramatically increasing, a HIGH RISK
of a repeatedly predicted massacre and murders? What kind of people are you?
Honor your oath. Let justice be done, though the heavens fall! More >>
http://fcase.blogharbor.com/blog
<http://fcase.blogharbor.com/blog>
<http://fcase.blogharbor.com/blog
<http://fcase.blogharbor.com/blog>
>
Prisoner of Conscience # 04746160
Our 2nd MLA Simpson's wife 1st response, from May 21, 1998
Constituency Assistant Jones: ”Thank you for providing this office with additional information with regard to your complaint against Mr. Alvarez. I have forwarded the whole package you provided to the office of the Honourable Lois Boone, Minister for Children and Families in order to assist her office with it’s investigation of your complaint".
Ms. Jones' compassionate response, from January 5, 2000
Following Children’s Commission’s Panel Chair Harris’ suggestion I, once again requested short meeting with our Honorable M.L.A. Her assistant Jones refused to arrange an appointment. I, reading just before about the Czech’s symbol of resistance against Russian occupation of Czechoslovakia who burned himself alive, made an impulsive statement: ”If nobody will investigate child abuse and discrimination, as ultimate statement and action to stop child abuse and discrimination, I will be forced to burn alive myself, maybe in your office". Ms. Jones answered: ”It is your choice" and ordered me to leave.
Reports of crimes committed against our child and family completed with the evidence of violated rights, freedoms, laws and rules and requests for help to solve them few authorities rightly identified, but never legally solved as complaints. They are also requests for help, reports of crimes and unique learning tool about the true state of public service and justice for the most vulnerable children and families. Yet some reputable thinkers identified our requests for their help as "a long thing", manifestations of mental illnesses, “letters“, "bullshit", evidence of summary offences, “large volumes [of correspondence regarding] the same issue”, “memorandums“, “messages“, “notes“, "nonsense", "garbage", "airing feelings", evidence of indictable offences, “these!!!", "crap", “joke", "STUPID FUCKING MESSAGES", and most recently, in the F-case first public comment, as "some papers" (the VPD Inspector on 14/3/05).
Child protection workers who know us personally and other officials who know our excellent record of parenting and foster parenting from the Ministry for Children and Families' files either commit, or with silent consent allow the grossest disobedience of laws and rules, terrible abuse of children's rights and freedoms, senseless destruction of our family and irreparable damage to our lives. Public servants' lies about us and their consequences, cover up and tolerance of illegal acts make almost eleven years of our lives indisputably the worst ones; public servants responsible for the F-case management have such hatred in their hearts that they deliberately destroy our lives . . . , but why? Why? WHY? For the lack of better responses, we welcome meaningless, evasive, misleading and threatening responses too. Punishments for sending our requests for help to government officials are preferred to unanimous disregard regarding the most important work of our lives. Any response at our requests for help is better than ignoring them, anything is better than ignoring violated children's rights, anything is better than being ignored.
Clearly, whole F-case management is only a trivial casualty of the cover up of Intentional Genocide of Native Children, perfectly proving how catastrophic the corruption of public service, justice and Canadian society is. Ask yourself: WHAT WOULD DECENT AND OF AVERAGE OR HIGHER INTELLIGENCE PERSON IN THIS SITUATION AND IN MY POSITION DO? All who know the difference between right and wrong definitely know the right answer too. Most sincere thanks for ANY response, dear reader.