Dear Sir:
We have had the opportunity now to review your document in more detail.  It is clear how difficult this has been for you and your family and how committed you are to seek resolution.  We have reviewed your demands and are sorry to have to tell you that we are not the agency to be able to assist you in meeting them.  You have requested:
1. Judicial review, criminal investigation or Inquiry of conduct of government.   The role of the health authority is to provide health services to the people who live and seek care within their catchments area. Judicial reviews, criminal investigations and inquiries are outside of our jurisdiction.
2. Disclosure and correction of all false information.  We  are also unable to assist you with this.  The health care services you refer to for your son were provided 10 years ago and there is no way to obtain second opinions or reassessments so long after the fact.   However, the documents containing your perspective have been attached to your son's file.  As well, the Act you reference is the Children, Family, and Community Services Act which does not refer to health authority services. 
3. Explanation, full, clear formal apology.    You referenced the Ministry of Children and Family Development and the BC Federation of Foster Parent's Association and the health authority has no jurisdiction over this Ministry or Agency. 
5. Help in leaving Canada.  Again, our role is to provide services to people living and receiving care within Vancouver Coastal Health and we have no ability to influence people's ability to leave Canada. 
We are very sorry that we are unable to assist you with your concerns.   If you are not satisfied with Vancouver Coastal Health Authority's response to your requests, you may contact the Patient Care Quality Review Board at this URL http://www.patientcarequalityreviewboard.ca/requestreview.html.
Sincerely,
Darren
________________________________________________
Darren Kopetsky
Regional Director, Client Relations and Risk Management
Vancouver Coastal Health
855 12th Avenue West, CP-380
Vancouver BC V5Z 1M9
office: 604-875-4557
________________________________

From: Gambler [mailto:licitacek@shaw.ca]
Sent: Tue 21/10/2008 9:59 PM
To: Kopetsky, Darren [VA]
Subject: Re: ULTIMATUM

Thank you, Daren! Acknowledging is everything, and just hours after receiving my first requests for your help! Thank you! Let's others to proceed with my son's Care Quality, they  know why his physical health is now being ruined on top of his mental health. Someone else's  e-address will replace your. Thank you!
PS: My identity is # 04746160, ask correctional services.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kopetsky, Darren [VA]" <darren.kopetsky@vch.ca <mailto:darren.kopetsky@vch.ca> >
To: "Gambler" <licitacek@shaw.ca <mailto:licitacek@shaw.ca> >
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:59 PM
Subject: RE: ULTIMATUM
I acknowledge receipt of your emails.
Please make clear your identity and specific complaint or issue you wish to have reviewed, otherwise we will not be able to proceed.   If your request is about multiple individuals, please advise of the names, birthdates (or personal health numbers), and contact information for each individual.
Thank you.
Sincerely
Darren
________________________________________________
Darren Kopetsky
Regional Director, Client Relations and Risk Management
Patient Care Quality Office
Vancouver Coastal Health
855 12th Avenue West, CP-380
Vancouver BC V5Z 1M9
office: 604-875-5845
________________________________

From: Gambler [mailto:licitacek@shaw.ca]
Sent: Tue 21/10/2008 7:36 PM
To: pat.bell.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:pat.bell.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; patti.marfleet@vancouverpoliceboard.ca <mailto:patti.marfleet@vancouverpoliceboard.ca> ; Pat.Wolfe@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Pat.Wolfe@gov.bc.ca> ; Patry.B@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Patry.B@parl.gc.ca> ; Paul.Jarman@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Paul.Jarman@gov.bc.ca> ; pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Pearson.G@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Pearson.G@parl.gc.ca> ; Penny.Davies@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Penny.Davies@gov.bc.ca> ; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca> ; Peter.Burton@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Peter.Burton@gov.bc.ca> ; Petit.D@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Petit.D@parl.gc.ca> ; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; VCH PATIENT CARE QUALITY OFFICE; Philip.Steenkamp@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Philip.Steenkamp@gov.bc.ca> ; Picard.P@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Picard.P@parl.gc.ca> ; Pierrette.Maranda@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Pierrette.Maranda@gov.bc.ca> ; Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca> ; Poilievre.P@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Poilievre.P@parl.gc.ca> ; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; premier@gov.bc.ca <mailto:premier@gov.bc.ca> ; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca> ; Preston.Guno@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Preston.Guno@gov.bc.ca> ; Preston.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Preston.J@parl.gc.ca> ; Priddy.P@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Priddy.P@parl.gc.ca> ; protocol@gov.bc.ca <mailto:protocol@gov.bc.ca> ; Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca> ; prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Rachel.Curran@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Rachel.Curran@gov.bc.ca> ; Rae.B@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Rae.B@parl.gc.ca> ; raj.chouhan.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:raj.chouhan.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca> ; ralph.sultan.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:ralph.sultan.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; randy.hawes.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:randy.hawes.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; Ratansi.Y@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Ratansi.Y@parl.gc.ca> ; rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:rattel@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; rcy@rcybc.ca <mailto:rcy@rcybc.ca> ; Redman.K@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Redman.K@parl.gc.ca> ; Regan.G@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Regan.G@parl.gc.ca> ; Rhiana.Raesler@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Rhiana.Raesler@gov.bc.ca> ; Reid.S@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Reid.S@parl.gc.ca> ; Rhoda.Garcia@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Rhoda.Garcia@gov.bc.ca> ; rich.coleman.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:rich.coleman.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; Richard.Fyfe@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Richard.Fyfe@gov.bc.ca> ; richard.lee.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:richard.lee.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; richard.neufeld.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:richard.neufeld.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; Richard.Simpson@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Richard.Simpson@gov.bc.ca> ; Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca> ; rick.thorpe.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:rick.thorpe.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca> ; rob.fleming.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:rob.fleming.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; Rob.Wood@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Rob.Wood@gov.bc.ca> ; Robert.Adamson@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robert.Adamson@gov.bc.ca> ; robert.gillen@gov.bc.ca <mailto:robert.gillen@gov.bc.ca> ; Robert.Goldschmid@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robert.Goldschmid@gov.bc.ca> ; Robert.Lapper@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robert.Lapper@gov.bc.ca> ; Robert.McConnell@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robert.McConnell@gov.bc.ca> ; robin.austin.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:robin.austin.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; Robin.Pike@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robin.Pike@gov.bc.ca> ; Robin.Syme@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Robin.Syme@gov.bc.ca> ; Rodriguez.P@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Rodriguez.P@parl.gc.ca> ; rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:rokosg@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; ron.cantelon.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:ron.cantelon.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; Ronald.Tucker@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Ronald.Tucker@gov.bc.ca> ; Ron.Kelly@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Ron.Kelly@gov.bc.ca> ; Rota.A@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Rota.A@parl.gc.ca> ; Roy.Hernes@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Roy.Hernes@gov.bc.ca> ; Roy.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Roy.J@parl.gc.ca> ; Russell.Getz@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Russell.Getz@gov.bc.ca> ; Russell.T@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Russell.T@parl.gc.ca> ; russem@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:russem@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; sam.sullivan@vancouver.ca <mailto:sam.sullivan@vancouver.ca> ; Sandra.Griffin@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sandra.Griffin@gov.bc.ca> ; Savage.M@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Savage.M@parl.gc.ca> ; Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca> ; Scarpaleggia.F@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Scarpaleggia.F@parl.gc.ca> ; Scheer.A@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Scheer.A@parl.gc.ca> ; Schellenberger.G@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Schellenberger.G@parl.gc.ca> ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Scott.A@parl.gc.ca> ; scott.fraser.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:scott.fraser.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; SG.Minister@gems1.gov.bc.ca <mailto:SG.Minister@gems1.gov.bc.ca> ; sgpcsb@gems9.gov.bc.ca <mailto:sgpcsb@gems9.gov.bc.ca> ; Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca> ; shane.simpson.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:shane.simpson.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; Shannon.Russell@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Shannon.Russell@gov.bc.ca> ; Sharon.McKinnon@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sharon.McKinnon@gov.bc.ca> ; Shauna.Morgan@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Shauna.Morgan@gov.bc.ca> ; Sheena.Heuman@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sheena.Heuman@gov.bc.ca> ; Sheila.OReilly@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sheila.OReilly@gov.bc.ca> ; Sheila.Stevenson@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sheila.Stevenson@gov.bc.ca> ; Sher.Gosling@gov.bc.ca <mailto:Sher.Gosling@gov.bc.ca> ; Shipley.B@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Shipley.B@parl.gc.ca> ; shirley.bond.mla@leg.bc.ca <mailto:shirley.bond.mla@leg.bc.ca> ; sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca <mailto:sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca> ; Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca> ; Silva.M@parl.gc.ca <mailto:Silva.M@parl.gc.ca>
Subject: ULTIMATUM
ULTIMATUM TO CANADIAN PUBLIC SERVANTS
End the coverup of crimes committed against my child and family. We are immigrants, model parents and citizens who did nothing wrong to you or anyone else, longing to live in a free and just country.  Your colleagues elected or appointed, sworn and paid to serve, protect, enforce laws or administer justice according laws and rules regularly do the exact opposite, regardless of oaths, laws, rules, costs, and consequences. In our case, perpetrators for whole year treated our child as dangerous pervert, guilty of repeated incestuous sexual assaults. Insanely obsessed to achieve his criminal conviction, collaborators treated his parents as cold-hearted beasts, unconcerned and uncaring about our children's safety, health and well-being, questioning our mental health. At the same time, we were unquestionably trusted to care for foster children with Special Needs. We reported to the Ministry for Children and Families that our child was considering suicide as a remedy to consequences he caused by sexually touching his sister 3 - 4 times after Halloween.  Instead of organizing immediate Suicide Watch to protect our child's health and life, for whole week many officials phoned prying questions, solicited unwanted opinions and refused to call later, when our scared children could not listen. All children were ordered to undergo humiliating specialist's examination for signs of sexual abuse. After the first ten days of appalling horrors, we knew that to be safe again, we must leave your country forever and as soon as possible. Authorities became enraged by our requests for help beyond any control, determined to silence us at any price. Some abusers reasonably, in all the circumstances, fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them. To avenge abusers' hurt feelings and reassure their impunity, Courts of Justice and mental health healers declared me mentally ill criminal, pushing me into the predicted madness.  Haters of the Truth are determined to sacrifice mine and other people's lives, rather than admit any injustice. This prize has been accepted by all informed; universal silent consent proves it beyond any shade of doubt. Some of you accept the possibility of being hurt or murdered. It is your choice (as my MLA's wife said). Many unsuspecting citizens and their children are, courtesy of their Government, exposed to the same risk. Contrary to you, they have no choice, no warning, and no protection. Start protecting children and families from pig-headed psychopaths at positions of power morbidly waiting for repeatedly predicted massacre and murders, confident to avoid own responsibility for not preventing them. Such creatures should be interned in special institutions indefinitely. End the mental torture, inflicted by utter contempt for our human and constitutional rights; like most of our requests for help, they are irrelevant, unworthy of your attention, action, response, comment. Uphold defiled Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and disgraced laws, impotent to protect our rights, health and lives. Let justice be done, though the heavens fall.

My wife, I and my firstborn son separately immigrated from our communist homelands, to live together in Freedom, safety and security. After our daughter and son were born, we became foster parents. Many of our foster children had Special Needs; some were sexually abused and abusive towards our own children. After many years of exhausting efforts, and a mere five months after being united, on December 30, 1997 we reported to our employer that our oldest child was considering suicide for touching his sister between legs. Instead of establishing an immediate hospitalization with a Suicide Watch, your colleagues accused our child to be dangerous pervert guilty of repeated incestuous sexual assaults and committed criminal negligence. The Deputy of the Director of Child Protection fabricated the false accusations: "parent not protecting from abuse", "sexual abuse/exploitation or likelihood by parent." Horrendous lies, undisclosed to us for one year and four weeks, were fabricated in spite of a detailed record of our excellent parenting and foster parenting, conducted by the Ministry for Children and Families to practice informed, professional decisions in the best interest of children.

The Vancouver police detective on January 6, 1998 had begun and closed the investigation: "I found him to be sincere, polite and extremely remorseful. Joseph admitted to each and every incident. He cried through his entire interview and on several occasion commented on the pain he has caused his entire family. Fisher was now considering suicide as a remedy to the problems he had caused. It is obvious to me that Joseph's family suffered a lot since these incidents. I have spoken with the agent from the Ministry who agrees with me that Joseph is a very immature young boy with a lot of mature adult problems. It is my opinion that subjecting this boy through our Criminal Justice System at this point would only serve to cause more distress to not only Joseph but his entire family. This is a situation that warrants a remedy through counseling and therapy. To subject the accused and his family to anything else would only serve to degrade the situation more. I have consulted with the Ministry who agree and support my conclusion. As a result I will be concluding this investigation with no charges".

The next day the Ministry had begun the "Investigation of Allegations of Abuse and Neglect in Foster Homes", by the protocol "to be used by manager upon receipt of any report that a foster parent has sexually abused, physically or emotionally neglected/abused a child in foster parents care." False accuser and our resources worker blackmailed us with threats to otherwise immediately drag away all our children and on January 9, 1998 forced us to sign the "Voluntary Care Agreement".

The next working day we hand-delivered first six written requests for help to the first six public servants. We expected immediate end of the unspeakable injustice, abuse and inhuman cruelty superimposed upon our family. Experienced perpetrators, however, expect reasonably to stay above the law, despite the consequences, regardless of whom and how many times we would seek any help. Thus the first request for help remains unacknowledged.

More than million requests for help later, all officials responsible for ruining our lives are free, many of them promoted so they can for more money commit and cover up more crimes against second-class citizens' children. Almost eleven years of denied, obstructed, and perverted justice confirms that covering up lies and crimes against poor children is entirely normal, fully acceptable, naturally Canadian way of governing over second class citizens. One response speaks for all: "Quit sending me your fucking stupid messages.....I could not care less so go away and fuck off!"

A Family Counselor at our child's school on January 14, 1998 offered the Ministry to do a swift assessment, in her office, at times when our child would not miss any class, and free of charge. False accuser refused the offer and lied that we ourselves had asked the Ministry to take our child away and put him into another school. The same day I reported the criminal acts committed against our child to the policeman who interrogated him. The policeman did not make any notes and did not fill any Report. He refused to call our child's teacher as a witness, but promised to call the false accuser. Neither his, nor her records show that such call was ever made.

Our Resources worker suggested her friend, the RSW, MSW, Family and Children's Therapist and Mental Health Consultant to do the Risk Assessment. He mentally tortured our child in unlawful State custody until April 16, 1998. He opened his sessions: "the torture is starting", called our child "TONTO" and threatened him with the long prison sentence. He prohibited our child to speak with us about his altogether ten, two-to-three hour long sessions in the kitchen of the foster home. Almost every time our child missed a whole school day. He repeatedly refused to meet us. Our resources worker delivered his plan to meet us only after his assessment would be finished, and his requirements to not spoil his work by asking our child anything about his sessions. Since the New Year to the end of his first school-year in Canada, our child was humiliated twice every school day in front of his classmates, when different cabdrivers obeyed the Ministry's orders to deliver him from and take him back to an unsafe foster-home.

The M.A. Child and Family Therapist of the Vancouver Incest & Sexual Abuse Centre on January 16, 1998 opened the first of six sessions with our daughter. She refused our presence and our request to videotape her sessions. In her Report about our daughter's state she lied: "At the time of referral she was reportedly engaged in temper tantrums, and expressing considerable guilt about getting people in trouble." At the end of January, our daughter's teacher contacted her: "In January I heard about what happened between Yosef and Jane from the principal, as well as from Ms. Fisher. I was amazed as I had not noticed any changes in Jane's behaviour or emotional state."The Therapist decided to radically change this state and professionally built false memories.

Psychopaths sworn and paid to protect the children looked forward to destroy also the life of my only daughter; for example, the Ministry demanded her interrogation from the VPD Sexual Offences Unit. Half-year later, when, after reviewing "the reports of both Enriquez and VISAC", "the police and Crown are reviewing the most appropriate way to proceed in this matter", our child's last but one social worker, Registered Master, described the service to be provided beside our child's emotional torture in unlawful confinement in Canada: "To assist family with separation and loss."

On February 19, 1998 we received written result of "Investigating Allegations of abuse and Neglect in Foster Homes" - blackmail par excellence: "The investigation found no grounds to close your foster home, or to remove the foster children presently placed with you. However, some conditions have been placed on this decision: 1) That a third child will not be placed in your home for the next several months 2) That both of you attend family counselling, either with VISACS (presently involved) or with any other agency. 3) That you will be involved and cooperate with the care plan for Joseph Jr. as determined by the social worker. Shanie RSW Levin, your resource worker, will continue to provide you with support and consultation.". The same day we responded with our second hand-delivered request for help. Then we phoned to the Children's Commission, reporting our child's abuse by the Ministry and requesting an immediate help.

The first false accuser on February 23, 1998 confessed: "there is no evidence that the parents are sexually abusing any child in the home, nor there is evidence that the parents are not protecting the children", reasoning that "these categories are used due to lack of more appropriate categories". After the Therapist ruined our child's first Valentine's Day in Canada, we instructed our lawyer to handle with the Ministry the end of our consent for that Therapist's participation. We found two Doctors of Psychology willing to make a swift Risk Assessment. The Ministry refused for "ethical reasons". 

Abused child's teacher on March 2, 1998 begged the Ministry: "There are two factors in Yosef's life that I know have been constant sources of encouragement and support: his father, and his stepmother. They are concerned parents, they are caring parents, and they have been doing a wonderful job at keeping Yosef as well-organized, calm and happy as possible. Mr. and Ms. Fisher have done an amazing job at portraying what could be a lifelong scar instead as positive learning situation. They have done an equally amazing job with Jane at the same time, from what little I have observed and learned. I look forward to this boy getting settled back with his parents."

On March 5, 1998 I hand-delivered this and four more support letters to the Resources Team Manager. She solved our third request for help by ordering us to meet her three hours later. Then she blackmailed us to undergo our mental health assessment, or immediately separate us from our last foster children. She already booked two appointments with some psychiatrist for both of us.

We cancelled the VCA on March 23, 1998. Our child was not liberated. His social worker and the Clinical social worker threatened to charge him with sexual assault. We explained them the Criminal Code exception for sexual interference "no person aged 12 or 13 years shall be tried" for our child's actions. On Friday April 9, 1998 we refused to sign another VCA. Social workers left our home with threats that had worked before, and repeated these a few times in front of our children: that they would return with the police to drag away all our children. For his first Easter in Canada, our tortured child remained in illegal State custody, I stayed with our last foster child at home, and my wife with our own children escaped to the USA.

Our child's teacher on April 13, 1998 begged the Ministry again: "I feel increased concern for the stress felt by this boy because he has still not been returned to his home. What are we governmental figures doing to this child? Please allow him to return to his sister and his parents. Please return him to his family."

On Tuesday after our child's first Easter in Canada, when his social worker received the teacher's second begging letter, the Ministry lawyers and social workers defrauded the Family Court. with brand-new false accusations. They lied that our child had committed crime punishable with an imprisonment for a term up to ten years. Our child's social worker explicitly prohibited him to participate and miss any classes and obstructed also our presence in the courtroom. Our child and we - model citizens, parents and foster parents, still caring for the last of many children, given to our care by the Ministry, then stood in front of the first Canadian judge we ever saw and waited for justice. We expected no less than The Right Honourable Chief Justice of Canada: "Judges give effect to our laws and give meaning to our rights and duties as Canadians. Every judge in Canada is committed to performing this important role skillfully and impartially. Canadians should expect no less." Naturally, we were absolutely certain that all illegal acts would then end, that abusers of our children would be immediately incapacitated so other public servants would think twice before lying to ruin other children and families' lives.

Honorable judge refused to hear anything at all from us. We were not allowed to defend our child against the malice and cruelty of public servants. She even refused to tell us why, scolding us instead: "You are wasting the court time".  Regardless of the rule of law, Canadian Constitution and all that crap, the first of Honorable judges joined all social workers, mental health professionals, policemen, lawyers and politicians who deny us, obstruct or pervert justice and ruined our child's childhood, health and life.

On the first day of May 1998, the Ministry received the Therapist's Report. Nobody was concerned about the lack of a single psychological test, or that he never contacted any person who knows our child or us to obtain vitally important information. Judge just four excerpts from his Report: "Mental Status": "Joseph is Mulatto in appearance. Joseph would benefit from Penile Plethysmography" (our child told us that his tormentor plans, together with his friend, to measure our child's erection when watching kiddies' and other pornography. That is the treatment of consenting pedophiles and sexual predators who murdered their victims - if they consent). Being a handsome, charming, friendly, and pleasant youngster, these are attributes that may pose a risk. I believe Joseph probably should have been charged for sexually touching his sister." The same day we hand-delivered our child's decision, with our consent, to return to his homeland.

A few hours later, our child's teacher faxed a "Personal message" to our MP: "It is about my student, Josef Fisher-Delis, an immigrant from Cuba. His father is Czech. It does relate to the prov. Min. of Child/Fam, who are severely hurting his family." And to us: "Mr. And Ms. Fisher, I will persue Libby. I am certain that she will speak with me. I will also consult Svend Robinson. They will know what we can do. Please do not send Josef to Cuba yet. Hold on. It is a terrible struggle, I realize. But for the health of the boy, he must have hope." To illustrate moral values, compassion and equality before and under the law, six years later the Honorable MP stole a $ 65,000.00 worth wedding gift for his homosexual lover. Our Honorable MP and his lover supportively held him, when crying thief admitted his theft. Your Honorable colleague served 100 hours of community service, no criminal record. I got a long one, with correctional services for non-violent defence of my child's unpardonably violated rights. Malicious stealing  powerless children, breaking families, enjoying good reputation and excessive salaries for protecting, while senselessly ruining their lives is morally unpardonable crime.

On May 5, 1998 the Ministry received letter from our Family Doctor: "Over the years I have dealt with the family on many occasions. I have always been impressed by the caring and respectful manner in which the Fishers treat their children. It is impossible to sense any difference in the care given to their biological versus their foster children. The Fishers are a very intelligent couple and extremely compliant and conscientious. During these trying times for Iva and Josef Fisher, their love and compassion for all of their children has been paramount."

On Mothers' Day, Social workers apprehended our last foster child from his preschool. After being one family for over two years, we were not even allowed to give him his clothes, toys and say good-bye. The Preschool Manager filled a complaint the following day: "It has been brought to my attention about the situation going on in the Fisher home. I had no idea and I am very surprised. Not only I was shocked about what happened, but how it was dealt with by the government officials. We are all professionals looking out for the best interests of the children so why are they having to suffer like this? Yesterday, May 7th, my class was interrupted by a Ministry officials who came in and took Jonah from our room. As for Iva and Josef, these two people are very caring and loving individuals. I am still in shock over what this poor family has been suffering through these past four months, although honestly you would never known it by looking at them. Iva and Josef have got to be the strongest people I have ever met. Even though their family has been torn apart and their hearts have been shattered; they still hold up their heads, smile, and are the best parents they can be. I hope that this mess will be cleaned up soon and their lives can get back to normal".

The Clinical Social Worker was the first to voice the collective fears on May 25, 1998: "I don't trust Enrique Assessment, due to his own lack of qualifications. Fischers' maliciously attacking workers should be hold accountable for their behavior. This new situation has come up that's very stressful for them. Mr. Fisher's ability to cope under stress is questionable. I know we have all been questioning his mental health. I think he is "a time bomb waiting to explode" and worry about how that is going to occur." And shared with others her learning experience how easy is to make from police officers obedient collaborators in achieving the Ministry goals: "I got throughto Sgt. H . They are reopening the case. They have to interview both Joe and Jane, which he thinks can start this week. I told him it is not likely he will be truthful, so he has the reports of both Enriquez and VISAC. I also let him know my view of the police whether Joseph was high risk in the first place. It's a learning experience for us all."

So ashamed the chief of the VPD Sexual Offences Unit and his detective not to know how deceitful 13 years old habitual rapists are, not recognize one before own eyes, when interrogating our child!   The Children's Hospital Specialist's report excluding that my daughter's vagina was penetrated has been irrelevant to the Ministry, though made at their demand. Peace Officers knew it before interrogating our child. 

The facts, laws, health lives, Truth, everything what  police state Governments do not respect must be disrespected by the Officers.  Born into one, we immigrated into another police state who treats us incomparably, unspeakably worse. Though your Charter guarrantees to every citizen of Canada  the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada, our child was abused against his and his parents' will in state custody for 270 days. It is my duty to speak up for Canadian children and for their parents, victimized beyond the possibility to speak for themselves; till my death and from beyond the grave.

The day after reviewing "reports of both Enriquez and VISAC", the detective informed us that our child would be criminally charged with sexual assault. Everything what the police in police states does and says should be automatically considered an illegal conduct and lying, to be taken seriously only  when an independent evidence clearly confirms it. Deadly policies, management and coverup of crimes against my child are an excellent, made in Canada examples.

After learning that our child would be criminally charged, on June 3, 1998 the first false accuser falsely accused me once again, this time of assaulting her ass in a bus. Before exiting the bus, I said: "Ty kurvo zasrana, tys znicila moji rodinu."  She does not understand Czech, thus the translation ("You filthy whore, you destroyed my family.") is entirely irrelevant. Accusation that I touched her massive body in any way is another overwhelmingly repulsive lie. Three witnesses could testify that I had only a backpack on my back. She however, "noted Mr. Fisher was carrying a plastic shopping bag which contained several objects, one of which looked like a large orange or grapefruit. I went directly to my office and made a report to the police."  It is just another evil lie, or delusional perception of reality? Using from time to time a few words in my language compensates a little public servants' favorite exploitation of my weak English to completely ignore what they hear or read. For many reasons, they should seek quick translation.

Following day the investigating Police Officer fabricated false evidence in her "Report to Crown Counsel: Proposed Charges; Assault Level 1 266 CCC 1. Did the accused make a statement? NO 2. Was the accused informed at the time of arrest or detention of the reasons therefore? YES 3. Are the exact words said to the accused re reasons for arrest or detention as set out below? YES 4. Was the accused informed at the time of arrest or detention of his right to retain and instruct counsel without delay? YES 5. Are all circumstances of the accused's exercise of his right to retain and instruct counsel without delay as set out below? YES." This Police Officer never met or spoke with me, grossly violating my legal rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

On June 17, 1998,  the first detective and his superior invited me to talk. After some good cop, bad cop tricks&threaths, I presented a copy of the Child, Family &Community Service Act, a copy of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and a long list of our child's grossly violated rights. We made a deal: quick reunion of my family for the end of complaining and an apology to two of my child's abusers. I got a nice enlightenment about the Charter: "All this is a bullshit!" As if I didn't know! I did my part.

The police acted with truly Canadian honor, honesty, values, ethic, love of the law and order, equality before and under the law, you know all that BS of yours. This is a window of excellent opportunity to join our Family Doctor and teachers of our children and present yourself as yet another compassionate, decent Canadian. If you feel sorry for my child, please, copy: I AM SORRY into my blog, to show that, beside guys I know from my frequent imprisonments and bums from Wreck Beach, other Canadians are capable of compassionate acts. If you feel safe only when nobody is watching, please, send it from some library or an internet cafe. You can make a huge difference in many lives, including yours. THANK YOU.

The Crown Counsel Query from June 24, 1998: "I didn't think there was sufficient evidence to lay assault charge. However, I have laid an 810. Please, obtain statements from the two community professionals who rec'd comments from Fisher about Laycock. This will better the evidence of the grounds for her fear. Also, please obtain a copy of the letter Fisher wrote to Laycock after this incident"   I wrote her nothing since the second requests for help, but called Miss Laycock the morning after making a deal with the police, leaving an apologetic message to save my child's vacations at Cuba, promised to him and to his relatives, falling into the police's entrapment of false promise.

During his first summer vacation in Canada, our child, instead of visiting his family and homeland, was still unlawfully detained in a second foster home. The Honorable Attorney General, whose help we sought from March 31, 1998 urged us on June 30, 1998 for the first time: "If you have any evidence that a crime has been committed, I would urge you to bring that evidence to the attention of the police in the jurisdiction where the alleged crime took place." The Law-enforcement Officer No.1 knew, or should know, that I had brought enough evidence to the attention of the police on January 14, 1998.

Six officers of the Ministry for Children and Families with our two obedient Peace Officers organized the Integrated Case Management Plan on July 8, 1998. Our devoted child's teacher accepted our unending requests for her help. We met our child there, delivered by his second foster parent. The courageous teacher repeated her offer,  which had been ignored since April: to rent a room to my son and me in her house, so our child could spend at least the rest of his first Canadian summer vacation with at least one parent. The Ministry refused, explaining that it cannot be done without a Study if she and her house are acceptable by the Ministry's standards. Conspirators then planned, with usual cruelty in front of our child: "There was a brief discussion regarding the option available to the police in this case. The two options discussed were Diversion and recommending that the crown approve charges. Tom and Axel pointed out that it was not usual in cases of sexual assault involving force to use the diversion option. The police and Crown are reviewing the most appropriate way to proceed in this matter".   Present was also some not Spanish speaking member of the Law Society from Victoria, the Government lawyer appointed to represent our child. We of course sought for months a Spanish speaking one. It did not matter; he objected nothing, not speaking at all. When he was leaving, we asked him what he thinks. And he thought that not our son, but our daughter should be parented by the Ministry.

The next day the Ministry started coaxing a Forensic Psychologist into their conspiracy to make a criminal from our child, based at Enrique and VISAC's Reports. And the day after that, our child's social worker and Clinical Supervisor noted in their "Summary: Dr. Adams has considerable experience working with youth who have sexually offended. After receiving the Director's material about this offence, Dr. Adams believes Yosef should have been charged after the offence; he has stated that the only effective treatment is available through the criminal justice system and; Dr. Adams concurs with the Director's view that the child should be living outside the home away from the victim." That would be true only if Enrique, VISAC's, Police and Crown Reports were truthful facts and not the most malicious lies, fabricated to achieve criminal conviction of our extremely emotionally abused child, illegally detained in Canada.

On August 6, 1998 the Ministry received the Dr. Adams' professional Risk Assessment, overdue since December 30, 1997: "Yosef wishes to return home and his parents concur. They feel prepared to protect all of their children from similar incidents in the future. Letters were reviewed which showed much respect for the parents parenting skills and love for their children, and for Yosef's generally good character. I do not recommend charging him with the sexual acting out before a Youth Court. I recommend that he is permitted to return home, once appropriate precautions are taken, such as the door alarm and other common sense considerations." A common sense was used the last time on January 6, 1998: "To subject the accused and his family to anything else would only serve to degrade the situation more. I have consulted with the Ministry who agree and support my conclusion."  

The best social workers who maintain the best interest of their clients as the primary professional obligation are entitled RSW. Their Board's investigator on August 14, 1998 determined that: "Mr. and Mrs. Fisher were so threatened by Mr. Alvarez's report and recommendations that they desperately sought to destroy him rather than face the seriousness of the issues. It is my observation that he acted professionally and ethically, with his clients' best interest at heart. It is my finding that at no time did RSW Alvarez and RSW Levin act unprofessionally or unethically in carrying their duties." This professional was for her achievements during the next five years promoted new member of their totally corrupt Board.

On the last week of our child's summer vacation, his social worker blackmailed us to voluntarily sign a Supervision Order for the next six months. Would we refuse, our child would suffer in illegal state custody for the next 183 days, on top of the 270 days of time served. Before signing it, on August 27, 1998 I publicly warned the blackmailer to kill anyone who would try to abduct my children again. With childhood hobby of manufacturing explosives and pipe-bombs, once teaching to kill non-commissioned officers at Army Academy, with powerful motive to kill abusers of my child, my warning should bring offenders and their helpers to senses long time ago.

Criminals who ruined the lives of my child and family served zero hours for their crimes altogether. For my efforts to save our child's life from being totally destroyed, I have so far served 243 days of correctional services and received 32 days and nights of professional care about my mental health. The Public servants' cruelty and malice that the Government enforced against our child is universally accepted, as well as endlessly repeated lies and locking me in prisons and mental health institutions, because some addressees of our requests for help reasonably, in all the circumstances, fear for their safety or for the safety of anyone known to them.

I filled my first complaint against the police on September 15, 1998. The next day, Tom for a first time arrested me. Without a Warrant. An Impostor impersonating the Justice of Peace tricked me to sign an "Undertaking": no contact with the first false accuser and the last blackmailer.

The next day, Crown Counsel counseling with the last blackmailer, conceded: "I would be upset too if my child was taken away." Following day, the last blackmailer called "back to Crown Counsel to let her know I was not happy with the way she treated me - making it look like I had done something wrong. She apologized and stated that she was frustrated with the police and their procedures in how they handled this".

On September 21, 1998 I found in my Particulars the original Ministry lie in the Crown Counsel Report #98-207953: Evidence of Berggren-Clive, Kathy: "This witness will testify that; Josef Fisher had been removed from the home several months earlier as a result of sexual assault investigation which determined that Josef Fisher had sexually assaulted his seven year old step-sister on a number of occasions in the family home over a six months period". Crown counsels further disseminated that our child is disgusting pervert guilty of repeated incestuous sexual assaults: "Joseph Fisher was interviewed and admitted to the police that he had in fact sexually assaulted his younger sister over a period of approximately 6 months. The reason that Josef Fisher was not charged at the time of the incident was partly because he is the product of a relationship that his father had been involved in several years ago in Cuba, prior to his present marriage." New conspirators fabricated evidence that Tom "conducted an investigation and determined that there was sufficient evidence to support a criminal charge of Section 271 C.C.C. Sexual Assault." 

Presenting the most malicious lies about our child as undisputable facts, crown counsels stated that "Josef Fisher had sexually assaulted his seven year old step-sister on a number of occasions in the family home over a six months period." Six months before we reported inappropriate touching and Ministry fabricated the original lie, our child was looking forward to live in that beautiful, rich, friendly and free country he knew from his visit four years ago. He was looking forward to live happily with his Canadian family in mere thirty-five days. He was promising his friends and family nice presents made in Canada, to deliver them the next vacations. Nobody knew he had the last six months of free, happy and healthy life ahead. With the most malicious lies about him, public servants ruined my child's health and life, causing him incapable to see his homeland and Cuban family again.

Preschool Manager registered her second complaint to Quality Assurance Manager on October 21, 1998: "I wish that all of this torture to the Fishers family would end. This is an amazing family who loves each other very much. I hope you can do something to help them bring their family back together again." Clinical social worker, Network Manager and Resources Team Manager immediately solved it: like our child's courageous teacher, courageous Preschool manager was by her superiors reprimanded for obstructing the Ministry's protection of our children.

On December 16, 1998  we hand-delivered our child´s third Formal Complaint to the Quality Assurance Manager. Clarke ended the complaint resolution process that day,  but waited a whole week, until Christmas Eve, to fax us her "Final Report" . The day before that, a Dr. of Psychology who inspired our child's first complaint, for the last time checked that the alarm works well every time our child opened his door.

On January 4, 1999, Honorable Attorney General urged us again: "Your concerns about Andrea Clarke and the social workers should be directed to my colleague, the Honourable Lois Boone, Minister of Children and Families, or her designate. In making enquiries on your behalf, my staff have been advised that Minister Boone or her delegate will be responding to your concerns, if this has not already occurred. Whenever an individual has reason to believe that someone has been involved in criminal activity, the proper course of action is for that individual to report their allegations to the police. It is the responsibility of the police to conduct investigations. I regret that I am unable to provide further assistance in this matter."

Two days after the Honorable Attorney General regretted his inability to provide further assistance, the Honorable Minister for Children and Families responded: "I would ask you to work with Andrea Clarke and her staff in the complaint resolution process that has begun."

Justices of Peace during the November, December and January refused to accept our "Information" about crimes committed against our child. The last time we tried, the Justices of Peace sent us to the police. The Detective who never annulled his threats to criminally charge our child, did not prepare any Report, did not make notes, and refused to investigate the crimes committed against our child too. It was clear to them that we did not have good evidence. But the next day, we finally received the thoroughly censored files about us. Though tens of pages are partially or entirely empty, someone leaked enough evidence for a scandal of unprecedented proportions.

For example, on January 6, 1999, the same day that the Honorable Minister asked us to work with Clarke, this Minister's Office superbly appraised Clarke's accomplishments: "Thank You, Andrea, I appreciate your taking the time this afternoon to with myself and staff from Child Protection Division regarding the Fisher case. I am thoroughly impressed with the steps that you and your staff have taken in attempting to address this family concerns. In fact, I would say that your actions have been above and beyond what would normally be expected! Your staff, both in the regional and field offices, have been required to deal with a string of inflammatory and harsh accusations. Such comments and accusations would weigh heavily on the confidence in staff to do the work required and only add to the already high level of stress that social workers face. On behalf of the Ministers' office, I would like to express appreciation for a job well done. Thank you again!" After testifying in two malicious prosecutions for seeking justice, Andrea was promoted to the Child Protection Mediation Program Manager, Dispute Resolution Office, Ministry of Attorney General.

In his Report to Crown Counsel, Tom described his actions after he refused to investigate the reported crimes: "So concerned about the mental state of the accused this witness approached his immediate supervisor and his officer in charge and advised them of the state of mind of the accused and the volatility that the accused was presently subject to. It is this witness honest belief that the accused is presently capable of any violent act at this point made and to achieve the goals to change the system." Ten days later, on January 5, 1999 the Deputy of Chief Constable set another police entrapment: "Your complaints regarding specific social workers should be taken up with the Ministry of Children and Families."

On February 12, 1999 I was for a second time arrested for faxing our requests for help to the Ministry of Children and Families, this time with a Warrant. We became a tiny casualty of the system and the deadly policies that protect the murderers of 50 000 Native children killed in the Residential Schools and hospitals. My child's abusers faxed among themselves: "one of the social workers in this office asked me what we can do about safety because he is a chemist and may make a bomb. I had not heard that Mr. Fisher was a chemist had you?"  Then another round: "Debbie left me a voice mail last night saying that she he was a chemist. I am advise Detective Jette." Around that time enraged Jette  broke the taboo and spilled the beans: "BUT WE KNOW WHAT CRIMES WE CAN INVESTIGATE AND WHAT CRIMES WE CANNOT!" This simple and natural knowledge is the most effective warrant that many serious crimes would never be prevented, investigated and punished.

To ensure  their own impunity, public servants consult together and develop a collaborative approach to the cover up. For example, six days after my second arrest, the Children's Commission informed Clarke: "To ensure Yosef's best interest in bringing the complaint to resolution, the Children's Commission Complaints Officer, the regional Quality Assurance Advisor and the Advocate for Child, Youth and Families will consult together to develop a collaborative approach to this."

On March 16, 1999 Crown Counsel to my defence lawyer: "Should your client enter a guilty plea, the Crown would seek a further period of incarceration of approximately 1 month, and a three year probation period". Murphy disclosed perpetual governments' desire and objective of our family persecutions: "The conditions requested by Crown would be as follows: not to send any faxes or letters to any ministry of Social services worker or office. Please be reminded that in the event this matter goes to trial, Crown will be entering background evidence of letters to various members of the Ministry prior to the dates over which the charge spans." 

On March 17, 1999 independent of government and political parties Ombudsman to our child: "we are writing to again confirm that our Office is not investigating your complaints about the Ministry for Children and Families at this time. Finally, we would again to confirm that our Office may conduct an investigation of a review by the Children's Commission."

The collaborative Honorable judge decided: "I am not deciding whether or not the actions of the Ministry through its agents were appropriate or inappropriate", and let me rot in jail for three months without bail. When His Honor finally released me on bail, I stayed imprisoned for the falsified "Undertaking" until I signed, among other conditions, "no communication by telephone, telegrams, computer, e-mail, including television, media, newspaper and radio until this matter is concluded." The Court of Law again ensured public servants they are free to break laws, abuse rights and ruin health and lives of poor children, with impunity and regardless of the rule of law, Canadian Constitution and all that crap.

On August 11, 1999 Children's Commissioner finally have had the opportunity to carefully review all the complaints to CC since March, 1998: "I have had the opportunity to carefully review all the complaints which you have filed with the Commission commencing in March, 1998. I have determined that the Commission will now directly and promptly address the complaints. The request that I send evidence of alleged criminal behaviour to the RCMP is denied. Your request that I conduct a special investigation into this matter is also denied. This matter is appropriately addressed through the complaint process. The Child, Youth and Family Advocate will be given notice of this complaint and is invited to participate on the review." The justice for powerless children and families similarly victimized by public servants sworn and paid to protect them is also denied.

My efforts to expose and limit public servants' crimes against children diagnosed many professionals  with many symptoms of many mental illnesses (delusions of persecution with narcissistic, obsessive, compulsive and antisocial traits, delusion of grandeur, altered thought process, decreased insight, potential for violence, aggression, self-harm, rigid thinking, attention seeking, possible substance abuse) and many disorders (Paranoid Personality with Delusional Disorder, Antisocial Personality Disorder, and Borderline Personality Disorder). And perpetrators who ruined our lives and their protectors for almost eleven years perfectly manifest psychopathic traits (total disregard for and violation of the rights of others, deceitfulness, repeated lying, reckless disregard for safety of others, cruelty, failure to accept personal responsibility for own acts, lack of concern for the suffering of others, lack of guilt, empathy, remorse).

Closely study prima facie evidence of committed crimes. Listen to the Audio Tape (go to the right corner of my blog) "THESE CRIMES ARE NOT GOING TO BE INVESTIGATED!" I was arrested at the end of that interrogation, once again without any warrant, but firstly under the Mental Health Act. Without any Court Order, the State detained me among seriously mentally ill people, without any treatment (except being involuntarily drugged three times),  because the police instructed mental health professionals to do so.The Head of the Intensive Psychiatric Care Unit evaluated the "Risk Assessment" on February 2, 2000: From the standpoint of risk, I believe that this man is quite capable of carrying out disastrous act in the community if, in his perception, the complaints that he and his wife have logged over the last two years are not dealt with."  

At the Eve before our child's 15th Birthday and Children's Commission's Hearing, my wife received via courrier the "SUMMONS: YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ATTEND as a witness at the place, date and time mentioned below, and to bring with you and produce all audio tapes and tape recording touching in any way on the complaint about the child. In particular, you are required to bring all such audio tapes and tape recording pertaining to conversations with social workers in this matter."

On May 25, 2000 the police Inspector set another entrapment: "Recently, you have been advised by Telus Corporation, acting on behalf of the Vancouver Police Board, to desist from using your Fax to send large volumes of same issue correspondence. First, that you are wasting your personal resources and the time of the agencies references by sending such material and, second, that if in fact you have relevant issues, then the same should be directed to the Ministry Of Child and Family Services." 

Telus disconnected our phone for one week. Three weeks after setting the latest police entrapment,  The National Security Investigation, Vancouver police and Criminal Profiler and Associate Professor of Clinical and Forensic Psychology reccomended: "to have him sign a contract acknowledging that if he violates it, he will be charged with Criminal harassment."  Experts elaborated the imminent danger: "It is clear that FISHER is not going to go away. It is possible that stress and pressure can cause a person to become mentally ill." They were right: the ever-present and overwhelming stress and pressure indeed caused our child to become mentally ill.

For trying to reduce the unspeakable injustice, abuse and inhuman cruelty superimposed upon our family, liars and their collaborators hate me so intensely they patiently wait for me to commit suicide, even a mass-murder, rather than admit any error. Authors of the "Threat Assessment" consensed: "There is a HIGH RISK that FISHER will carry out an act of violence against any person who, at that point in time, he feels is significantly interfering with his life. There is also a HIGH RISK that, if he attempts suicide, he will try to take someone with him. FISHER obviously feels justified in his course of action and he has the ability to carry out his threats. The act of writing and sending faxes is an outlet for FISHER for the moment. As long as he sees alternatives to violence, he will utilize them. The risk would increase dramatically if the contact stops."

Just three months later, on September 14, 2000 the imminent danger increased dramatically: Honorable Minister for Youth prohibited us to fax him anything. He hang up with a grave threat: if we fax anything to him, our phone would be disconnected. We called back two minutes later and reached his answer machine. In spite of not faxing a single dot to the Honorable Minister, our phone was two hours later permanently disconnected. Three weeks after dramatically increasing the high risk of lost lives, the Honorable Minister was promoted to third Attorney General.

Tom's superiors ordered to arrest me Without Warrant on January 18, 2001. Tom again transported me in handcuffs, again in an unmarked car, this time with another guy driving. Before throwing me into jail once again, Tom for a few seconds silently stood with his back toward me, in his shirt, though the temperature was below zero and he had a jacket in the car until he get out. With ominous silence from both guys, I was looking directly at Tom's exposed gun. Charges: Criminal harassment, Breach of probation, Uttering threats. To be released on bail five days later, I had no choice but to sign "Not to communicate by electronic Mail or fax with any office or employee of the Ministry for Children and Family Services." Crown counsels unsuccessfully requested an absurd condition: that also my wife is forbidden to communicate with the Ministry in any way. Because her daily sent written requests for help and phone calls were ignored like before, after a few days I started sending my requests for help to government agencies including the Ministry again.

On May 25, 2001 the police Inspector who set the latest entrapment, solved the latest complaint with newest threat: "It is clear that the psychiatrists who examined you at hospital following your arrest agreed with the non-medical assessment of the respondents who arrested you. Such agreement is reflected in the fact you were subsequently accommodated at a mental health facility for thirty days. Many social and government agencies have been made privy to your grievance through tens of thousands pages mailed, faxed and otherwise delivered documents citing your grievance. Unfortunately, following your release from the referenced institution - and in spite of many previous requests and warnings to cease sending your documents - you renewed such activity with increased vigour and vituperation. You have been warned by police on 2001-February-23 to desist from continuing to re-offend, or you will be liable to a third arrest."

Fourth Attorney General acknowledged our requests for his help: "Dear Josef and Iva Fisher: Thank you for your letter of September 16, 2001. As the issues you raise fall under the purview of the Minister of Children and Family Development, I have taken the liberty of forwarding your correspondence to the Honourable Gordon Hogg".

Dramatically high risk of lost lives is universally accepted by everyone informed. Another Honorable judge reasoned, just before sending me into prison once again: "social workers were doing the best they could do."

On September 27, 2002 the Honorable Chief Judge of the BC Provincial Courts admitted: "I am unable to assist you with your concerns." One week after the Honorable Chief Judge admitted her inability, the Ministry offered to help us with the last of our five demands.  We insisted at all our demands must be dealt with.

On December 4, 2002 I was arrested for the 9th time, this time with a warrant. Because I "between the 19th day of August, 2002 and the 25th day of November, 2002, while bound by a probation order made by The Honorable judge Weitzel, on the 17th day of April, 2002, did without reasonable excuse fail to comply with such order by contacting members of the Ministry for Children and Families, contrary to section 733.1 of the criminal Code of Canada."

To ensure my attendance in court proceedings, the Honorable judge denied me any bail. But since Honorable judge refused to accept my one page long written Statement, the rest of court proceedings nevertheless proceeded in my absence. After a few secret hearings I was without any explanation or conditions released after seventy-eight days of correctional services  in maximum security prison. The next morning, on February 19, 2003 administrators of justice proceeded with another secret hearing in my absence, further conspiring how to buy our conscience. This outrageous attempt to buy our silence remains the only attempt to close our case peacefully.

I inquired from all my mates receiving correctional services in Maximum Security Prisons the quality of foster care most Canadian prisoners lived through. Honesty is the best policy, they knew we met courtesy of social workers who stole my child. One horror story after another. Yet many of them, once or twice, were accepted, as every child should be, being soon kicked out from that safe place by his social worker. Most of them have an excellent sense of justice, totally absent in public servants' minds and acts. Not your justus,  but balanced, quid pro quo justice, trying to give the society back what they got. Impossible task, nothing can balence the child's life ruined by psychopaths paid for doing it.

On March 14, 2005 I once again sought help from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. My previous attempts to speak with someone from the CBC always ended with the receptionists' instructions to leave my documents there, with the same promise - that someone would soon contact me. Years passed, but nobody has yet found the time to do so.

That day, at 1:30 pm, I e-mailed the latest request for help to 294 addressees. This request for help is the first article of my blog. At 2:10 PM I hand-delivered the same request for help to the CBC receptionist. I was completely ignored for one hour. Then someone gave me back my request for help. He explained that nobody will accept my request for help, because of a threat: "THIS IS AN EMERGENCY!!! If ignored, I will sacrifice my life - set myself on fire to achieve some Justice." The warning was used so the public would finally know and examine the evidence that public servants commit crimes against children even at the price of lost human lives.

Then followed the emergency response: I was sitting in front of the CBC, holding an open bottle and two lighters. Nobody attempted to communicate with me in any way, let alone to negotiate. I ended this embarrassing theatre after about twenty minutes. I closed the bottle and went back to the empty, but unlocked CBC building. Nothing happened. I walked back, towards the ERT. I ignored the ERT's orders to kneel in front of them - I would rather die standing, than to kneel in front of a Pig. Peace Officers discovered a binder in my backpack, labelled with big letters: "SHORT AND INCOMPLETE REPORT. PUBLIC OFFICERS' CRIMES AGAINST OUR FAMILY 31/12/97 -TODAY." All this was witnessed by many CBC employees, their visitors and bystanders. A lot of them recorded the heroic ERT response with their cameras.

Canadians have the right to know how rotten, deceitful and pitiless the reputable pillars of their society are. Citizens have the right to know whom they gave the right to govern over them, whom they gave confidence and power to serve and protect their children and their rights, freedoms, safety, security, health and lives. The media responded with the first public comment:

 "Attention-Seeker" Arrested After CBC Incident

Mar, 14 2005 - 4:00 PM VANCOUVER(CKNWAM980)--Vancouver Police had to send the Emergency Response Team Monday afternoon, after a man threatened to light himself on fire at the CBC Plaza in downtown Vancouver. Just after 3 PM, the man entered the foyer of the building on Hamilton Street carrying a one-litre bottle of some flammable liquid, paper and a number of cigarette lighters. Insp. Bob Rolls says the ERT managed to take the man down before he hurt himself or others. Rolls says he suspects the man just wanted some attention. "I think he's going through something to do with a family break-up situation, and he was despondent about that.' Rolls says this man has been struggling with mental health issues, and they have dealt with him before".

It was the same in my then communist homeland; governments, police, courts of law and media served the reality and facts to the public with equal accuracy and truthfulness, with equal respect for human rights and lives. Law-enforcement forces knew what crimes they cannot investigate and prosecute, media knew what crimes they cannot announce and denounce. Criminals knew what crimes they can commit and their victims knew that seeking justice results in additional crimes.  Public servants with the same "morality" and the same "ethic" persecuted and locked their critics in prisons and lunatic asylums. And newspapers lied to the public the same way. But public servants abusing powers to cover up organized child abuse like their Canadian soul mates - that's too absurd; it is unthinkable. When the police regime collapsed, most criminals were fully or partially amnestied. Exempted were only the most despicable types - abusers of power and child abusers. 

Most children in our care were of native origin. Six of them were abused or neglected so seriously that the most disruptive method was in their best interest. Thirteen other children were senselessly abused and traumatized. We regularly met and closely observed their parents. In their cases not brutal, but much cheaper, entirely safe and efficient methods were not considered at all.

The chances that ordinary Canadian children and families can successfully defend their rights, health and lives against similar cruelty and malice is absolute zero, considering our excellent work for the Ministry for Children and Families. Native origin, the wrong accent, wrong color and other "disabilities" are aggravating factors.

In your police state, most lately the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is serving pedophiles, sadists and murderers (many fresh ones prosper as foster parents) of native children to escape justice. "It's the official posture of the government of Canada that the word genocide will not be used in connection with the residential school truthandreconciliation process. But genocide is exactly what it was, and until that truth is recognized, reconciliation remains impossible." (Ward Churchill)

A psychiatrist in charge at St. Paul Hospital diagnosed me "paranoid & delusional" and kept me there for almost 24 hours. The next psychiatrist in charge hastily released me, without any paperwork, maybe because he knows me since my first evening in State Custody. In the meantime, another gang of Peace Officers lied to my wife that I told them my plans to kill her and all our children, and some social worker offered my family a safe house. My wife declined such generosity. 

On April 4, 2005 the sixth Honorable Minister for Children and Families Development acknowledged for a first time our requests for his help: "Please remove me from your distribution list. Thank you." And two weeks after that: "I have asked before and will kindly ask again. Please CEASE e-mailing this account. Both Josef AND Iva Fisher. If you would like to send in correspondence, please do so. Thank you." We informed the Honorable Minister that any communication in writing IS the correspondence and he ended all communication.

On November 17 2005, on the Night of the Police Awards and the 15th Anniversary of our wedding, a gang of Peace Officers and one Officer of the Ministry forced their entry into our home without any warrant. They were hunting a suicide-bomber, who had reportedly uttered threats in the Honorable Attorney General's Constituency Office. Courtesy of the police, it is known that the sixth Honorable Minister for Children and Families Development consulted this little incident with the fifth Honorable Attorney General.

The police imprisoned my son for an outstanding warrant on January 9, 2007. I gave my son's lawyer a request to the Honorable judge before a hearing ten days later: "Beside just punishment, however, Yosef also deserves psychologist's professional help, which we request. Otherwise, he will never achieve his dreams to make living as an artist and useful member of society. In spite of our superhuman efforts, and due to circumstances beyond our control, our child is now a homeless drug addict with criminal record and ruined life."

When my son got another lawyer, I repeated the same request. Nothing happened. Our child was kept in the solitary confinement. Because of utter lack of any mental health help during his forty-eight days of imprisonment, I paid the bail on February 26, 2007. Correctional officers knew that something was terribly wrong: instead of releasing our child from prison, the guards transported him to a nearby hospital. The police twice tasered our child exactly one week later, and transported him to the Vancouver General Hospital. Now he lives in a Group Home. Professionals gave my first-born child the responsibility to never let me enter that house. Our athletic child who had been in excellent physical shape, gained more than one hundred pounds during his first eight months there. And the voices in his head are more frequent and more troublesome.

Mental health professionals carry on this national tradition to harm second class citizens and their children regardless of the Hippocratic Oath and all that crap. Learn more from the book "Hidden from History - The Canadian Holocaust": Under the guise of tuberculosis treatment, generations of native children and adults were subjected to medical experiments and sexual sterilizations at hospitals. Hospitals stored children's bodies from the residential schools. Abortions were performed on native girls who were made pregnant at the school by staff and clergy, and newborn babies were disposed of.

Thousands of victims of public servants' crimes are afraid to seek justice, and millions of their fellow citizens pretend the confidence in the government. Every nation has the government and media it deserves.  Almost eleven years of teaching public servants how to serve and protect, instead of to ruin or terminate poor children's lives over and over again, is the hardest and most important work of our lives, so far absolutely unsuccessful.

We requested any help in writing from more than one thousand and three hundred public servants or agencies; more than a million times.  In my blog you will find some copies of some responses and important excerpts from other written responses. For an overwhelming majority of addressees and readers, our requests for their help are unworthy of any response. All others either ignore, or repeat old and fabricate additional lies, helping liars for almost eleven years to escape justice. Because all informed public servants betrayed us, we seek help from our fellow citizens with the help of the internet since the first public comment.

At morning on March 19, 2007 I politely distributed copies of the first media comment from March 14, 2005, with a little addendum, to employees and visitors of the CBC Head Quarters. Soon the police arrested me, and at the requests of some of the CBC agents, Peace Officers took my picture for the CBC use. After a long communication with superiors they called an Ambulance, and transported my possessions in their car to St. Paul Hospital. I was committed for a couple of hours, until the psychiatrist from my first arrest arrived. After a 2-3 minutes long assessment, without any paperwork, he released me. Thieves stole my buss pass and home keys and accused the paramedics of being responsible for the loss, though all seized items were transported in their cruiser. The CBC is one of uninterested addressees of this ULTIMATUM. To be salable, news must be both new and interesting, truthfulness is irrelevant.

The VPD Insp. on August 4, 2008, confirmed reading the Subject: ULTIMATUM TO CANADIAN PUBLIC SERVANTS. One week later, a Det/Cst wrote: "I am currently reviewing all available materials on your blog to familiarize myself with your case. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions." On September 24, 2008 at 5:51PM, the Det/Cst wished me: "Good day Mr. Fisher, I have read the contents of your blog posted at http://fcase.blogharbor.com <http://fcase.blogharbor.com/> . If you are interested, I would still like to meet you in person to discuss this further with you. Please advise at your convenience." My immediate response: "Good evening Det/Cst Lowe, You certainly worked long hours overtime to read and comprehend it all. As you have read, the last time another VPD Det/Cst invited me to discuss this further and incarcerated me for 30 days in Lunatic Asylums. Without any court order, as you also have read. You too may be tempted to do something illegal. To prevent it, and if you are interested, sent me all questions you want to discuss. I will answer them as best as I can, as soon as possible, if still possible. Just tell your supervisor who ordered you to communicate with me that I want his/her name and signature under these questions, if she/he likes to know my answers." For years, the same offer is an important part of our requests for help.

My wife was on September 26, 2008 greatly surprised with following e-mail: "We received a report from the Vancouver Police Department acting on behalf of the owner of the email addressswill@direct.ca <mailto:addressswill@direct.ca>  <mailto:swill@direct.ca <mailto:swill@direct.ca> > . The owner of this email address has allegedly sent cease and desist requests in the past asking that no further emails be sent to it. The owner claims that the emails continue and we have an example of one such message. The police have asked that we contact you directly so as to resolve this issue as peacefully and easily as possible We ask that Mr. Joseph Fisher refrain from any further email communications with the email address swill@direct.ca <mailto:swill@direct.ca> . Future complaints regarding unwanted email communications from any email address using your internet connection could possibly result in legal action by the complainant(s) on the grounds of harassment and termination of internet services by Shaw Cable." The owner was appointed to the Police Board on June 30, 2008, the contact address accessible from the "Safe Streets - Safe Cities" internet report. Tired of waiting for the most efficient and the most shocking solution? Is the explanation for your role in allowing it happen plausible? Then go ahead, cowards!

Like Police Officers, all others after a good sleep, determined to sacrifice mine and other people's lives, rather than admit any injustice, daily enjoy excellent reputations and obscenely high salaries, with pleasant assurance that all together are equally corrupt law-breaking scoundrels, safe from unpleasant consequences. Guardians of the Constitution, our fellow citizens, lovers of the law and order, champions of children's rights, Free speech and justice, singers guarding your Canada, what if tomorrow is too late to do the right thing? End deadly policies. Choose Life. Or, shake your blood-stained hands with psychopaths who never tried to eliminate, but calmly wait for repeatedly predicted violent deaths.
And bear the consequences.
Our Demands:
1. Judicial reviews, criminal investigation or Inquiry into Conduct of Government [CCC, Inquiry Act S.1]
2. Disclosure and correction of all false information [FOIPPA S.2 (b), CF&CSA s. 76 (5) (b)]
3. Explanation, full, clear, formal apology [MCF Policy Manual IV iii)]
4. Letter of acknowledgment of our excellent fostering services [Agreement of the MCF & BCFFPA]
5. Help us leave your stolen cursed land on Compassionate, Humanitarian, or any grounds you wish, ASAP.

What will YOU do? How can you accept your salaries and do nothing to protect the public and prevent dramatically increasing, a HIGH RISK of a repeatedly predicted massacre and murders? What kind of people are you? Honor your oath. Let justice be done, though the heavens fall!    More >> http://fcase.blogharbor.com/blog <http://fcase.blogharbor.com/blog>  <http://fcase.blogharbor.com/blog <http://fcase.blogharbor.com/blog> > 

Prisoner of Conscience # 04746160

Our 2nd  MLA Simpson's wife 1st response, from May 21, 1998

Constituency Assistant Jones: ”Thank you for providing this office with additional information with regard to your complaint against Mr. Alvarez. I have forwarded the whole package you provided to the office of the Honourable Lois Boone, Minister for Children and Families in order to assist her office with it’s investigation of your complaint".

Ms. Jones' compassionate response, from  January 5, 2000

Following Children’s Commission’s Panel Chair Harris’ suggestion I, once again requested  short meeting with our Honorable M.L.A. Her assistant Jones refused to arrange an appointment. I, reading just before about the Czech’s symbol of resistance against Russian occupation of Czechoslovakia who burned himself alive, made an impulsive statement: ”If nobody will investigate child abuse and discrimination, as ultimate statement and action to stop child abuse and discrimination, I will be forced to burn alive myself, maybe in your office". Ms. Jones answered: ”It is your choice" and ordered me to leave.