From the Report to Crown Counsel 01-012424:

"In January of 1998 a complaint was laid by the Ministry of Children and Families after the accused’s daughter disclosed to a social worker that she had been digitally penetrated by her 12 year-old brother on a number of occasions over a six month period. Acting under the guidelines of the Child Protection Act, the Ministry removed the accused’s son from the home in order to deal with the protection issue of the victim. At the time of this incident the accused and his wife ran a daycare out of the basement of their home and utilized this service as their sole source of income Due to the nature of the allegation, the ministry also notified the parents of the children attending the daycare that there had been an allegation of sexual assault by one of the family members of the daycare proprietor. This in effect caused the parents of the children attending the daycare to withdraw their children from the accused’s daycare facility. As a result the accused had his son removed from the family home and the accused and his wife lost their source of income. Over the next few months, the accused’s son received therapy and counseling for the sexual deviancy and eventually was returned to the family home. Starting with the apprehension of his child the accused commenced a campaign to seek justice for all the injustices that he felt he and his family had been subjected to. The accused commenced a letter and fax campaign to numerous officials within the ministry and the Provincial Government. The accused sent hundreds and hundreds of letters and faxes to everyone he felt played a part in the "abduction" of his son". This campaign went non stop. In order to effectively give the accused and opportunity to air his feelings a number of meetings were set up with officials from the Ministry and the police to try and resolve some of his issues. Despite the fact that these meetings were held the accused was never satisfied with the outcomes. The accused then pursued every avenue of appeal made available to him. Unfortunately the accused was again never satisfied with the outcome or the decisions of any officials. In fact in some circumstances the accused walked out of the room half way through the process. The accused continued his campaign of writing letters and faxes to Cabinet Ministers, Ministry officials, the police, news mediums and the list goes on. The campaign to seek justice in the accused’ words became very personal and the accused made very specific threats to a number of individuals within the Ministry. As the time progressed the threats and the frequency of letters and faxes aimed at Ministry workers increased to a point where several of the workers feared for their own safety. In one instance the accused boarded a BC Transit bus directly behind a ministry worker identified as Robin Laycock and struck her with a bag of groceries. As a direct result of his actions as well as the content, frequency and volume of documents being sent to the ministry, the accused was arrested and charged with Criminal Harassment. By the time the accused was arrested several hundred documents had been forwarded to the Ministry, individual workers, government officials and the police. The accused went sent for a 30-day psychiatric assessment and was eventually convicted under Section 264 of the Criminal Code for Criminal Harassment. Since this order Mr. Milowsky alone has received an average of eight e-mails a day and again has received in the hundreds of documents, many of which number near 100 pages. It should be noted that as a result of the letter campaign and the aggressive nature by which the accused is conducting himself, a number of provincial social workers have had to transfer out of the lower mainland in fear of their own safety. The Ministry has employed security guards at a number of their offices solely for the purpose of protection from the accused. These preventive measures have cost the Ministry for Children and Families several thousands of dollars. It should be noted that a number of Psychiatric assessments have been conducted on the accused and his behaviour. Court ordered assessments were done at Riverview hospital and the RCMP threat assessment Unit. All of these assessments were similar in nature in that they determined the accused to be unpredictable, volatile and dangerous, not only to himself, but to others as well. A quote from the RCMP threat assessment is as follows: It is the consensus of the group that there is a HIGH RISK that Fisher will carry out an act of violence against any person who, at that point in time, he feels is significantly interfering with his life. There is also a HIGH RISK that, if he attempts suicide, he will try to take someone with him."