This is supposedly the copy of an original dated July 5, 2004. We moved to that address / here over-pasted with present address + :-) / thirteen months after that. The decision was made in July, 2005.
Do Vancouver Policemen know the exact facts one year before they would happen? Are they Psychics, or are they Psychopaths? Are they Clairvoyants, or are they Crooks?
YOU DECIDE.
November
24, 2007
Dirk
Ryneveld, Q.C.
756
Fort Street 3rd Floor
Victoria, BC
V8W 1H2
REQUEST FOR
FULL DISCLOSURE
Mr. Ryneveld:
On November 20, 2007, I received your “Review of Discipline Authority’s Decision”,
mailed on November 19, 2007, predated November 13, 2007, regarding the Complaint #07-57937/OPCC # 2007-3689 from September 14,
2007. Sending it to your Victoria office finally bypassed your Senior
Investigator MacDonald who “solved” the F-case complaints from 1998, the last
few without your inputs and signatures. By the way, Investigator Bachman was
abusing her powers the same way before your colleague and predecessor Morrison
was ousted from his office (at the unanimous wish of his subordinates).
On May 4, 2004, when you replaced your predecessor, I begged you: “Please, would you be so kind to meet us,
for some 10 – 15 minutes, to review the evidence of crimes committed against
our child and family? You responded on May 31, 2004: "I do not see
on a cursory review of the documentation that you have supplied that our office
has any jurisdiction to deal with your complaints and concerns. In all of the
circumstances, I do not believe that a meeting with me would be of assistance
to either of us. This office will take no further action". Mr. Ryneveld, I
think that a matter as serious as this one would suggest a comprehensive
review by all authorities, not just a cursory review by you.
Because nobody
else had taken any lawful action, though a few (including your subordinate MacDonald) have taken a few
unlawful actions, we decided to waive our privacy in March 2005. I put some prima facie evidence of crimes,
committed against our child and family, on the Internet for all interested
persons to see and judge for themselves how the VPD has been obstructing
justice, committing, aiding, abetting, and covering up crimes against my child
and family. You can review that evidence, any time you wish, 24 hours a day,
365 days a year. You say in the
above-referenced letter, “Based on the evidence available, I have no basis upon which to
conclude that further investigation is warranted”. Mr. Ryneveld, the prima facie evidence has been available. If you were to
read my blog, then I believe that you would certainly find a basis to conclude that
further investigation is most urgently warranted. I hereby request your fullest attention to
this prima facie evidence. Thank you.
Kindly listen to the Police Vows: "THESE
CRIMES ARE NOT GOING TO BE INVESTIGATED!". Under the F-case&VPD: Clairvoyants or Crooks? Kindly review my
wife’s request to you, unacknowledged to this day: “Dear Police Complaint Commissioner, I
respectfully remind you that you already acknowledged the F-case: "I do not
see on a cursory review of the documentation that you have supplied that our
office has any jurisdiction to deal with your complaints and concerns". I
object, policemen abusing their powers require thorough, impartial, fair and
competent investigations. To know a case one must know it from the beginning,
all relevant circumstances, facts, evidence. Supplying such complex
documentation is impossible, but my husband made some documentation available
to public servants at http://fcase.blogharbor.com. A cursory look at copies
of falsified and other documents will certainly persuade you that thorough and
competent investigations are indispensable. I also complain at your
subordinate’s abuse of power. Senior Investigator MacDonald solved my complaint
about VPD Inspector Cooper's solving of my complaints regarding falsified
documents from July 2004, with the address unknown to anyone until July 2005:
"This office confirms the summary dismissal of your complaint". And
Inspector Cooper solved my complaint about the VPD Officers' forceful entry and
search of our home without any permission or a warrant: "There is no
evidence, other than your unsupported assertions, that any of the police
officers committed any discipline defaults as defined by the Code of
professional Conduct regulation pursuant to the B.C. Police Act". Those
two officers are obviously solving complaints behind your, and behind the VPD
Chief Constable’s, back; his and your predecessors were sending registered
solutions of complaints, stamped and manually signed on pre-printed forms. I
ask you to do exactly what is fair and right in our and other cases, to
oversight law enforcement in public interest and exactly as the laws and rules
command. Sincerely yours, Iva Fisher"
You
wrote: “I sensed that you were requesting
that I review the Department’s decision to not substantiate your complaints”. Sensing, like cursory reviews, is not enough.
I asked you: “This
is most urgent demand to uphold the laws and restore my and my family’s Human
and Constitutional Rights, grossly violated by the Vancouver Police”. You completely ignored the
most noteworthy part of my complaint from September 14, 2007. I take the liberty
to inform you again that: Even after the most cursory review, you are
certainly aware that Stamakamis and Irving
arrested me at the wish of persons unknown to me without any warrant and
without any reasonable grounds to believe that 1. any offence has been or is
suspected to have been committed, 2. anything exists that will afford evidence
with respect to the commission of any offence, or will reveal the whereabouts
of a person who is believed to have committed any offence, and 3. anything
exists that is intended to be used for the purpose of committing any offence
against the person for which a person may be arrested without warrant.
Stamakamis and Irving grossly violated my legal rights in dealing with the
justice system and law enforcement contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms, namely: Section 7: right to liberty, and security of the person.
Section 8: right from unreasonable search and seizure (only if the authorities
believe someone is a threat to another, to society or to themselves, is such a
search justified). Section 9: freedom from arbitrary detainment or
imprisonment. Section 10: The right to legal counsel.
You also wrote: “Based on the
evidence available, I have no basis upon which to conclude that further
investigation is warranted”. As you undoubtedly know, every lawful response
to complaints must contain Duty Reports, copies of all notes written by
involved police officers on March 19, 2007, their responses when they were
interviewed, and all documentation, including the list of items seized from me
when I was arrested on March 19, 2007. I hereby insist on having all of this
documentation in my hands, without further delay. And I want you to have all of this documentation in your hands. That will be a
basis upon which any reasonable person will conclude that further investigation
is warranted. Find
out the truth.
My property stolen by Stamakamis and Irving is only an insignificant abuse
of power, considering the serious crimes against my child and family. VPD peace officers have been obstructing
justice, for more than seven years preferring that I commit suicide or even a
mass–murder, as predicted by a group of experts, at the VPD members’ request, with
their participation, in efforts to cover up crimes committed against my child
and family, rather than admit, apologize for, and learn
how to prevent similar and worse wrongdoings in the future. Nevertheless, Stamakamis and Irving
deserve the harshest punishment for abusing their powers and for lying about it,
and I say to you that arranging for such punishment is your job. Do your job, please.
I repeat: Get a basis upon which any reasonable person will conclude
that further investigation is warranted!
I REPEAT: UPHOLD THE
LAW!
Josef Fisher
2125 Hermon Drive
Vancouver, BC
V5M 3X6
