DEMANDS TO GOVERNMENT:
1. Help us leave Canada
2. Radically improve your corrupt practices
3. Justice - first, oust all the corrupt
CHRONOLOGY
CHRONOLOGY
1997
December 30
We reported Joe's indecent touching and the
possibility of suicide to the Ministry for Children and Families. Though failing
to arrange a 24/7 Suicide Watch and Risk Assessment, Ms. Kotorinsky concluded
that we have the situation fully under control. But Miss Laycock asked, and got
her supervisors' approval to help our family. From her CF&CS Intake Report: "Medical information: BC Childrens Hospital
Dr. Korn Normal exam. Joe is very upset - father thinks he may harm himself he
is so upset. Interview needs to be done as soon as possible. Section 13
Concerns: parent not protecting from abuse, sexual abuse/exploitation or
likelihood by parent." These initial lies, and reasoning from February 24 why
they were used, remained undisclosed for us until January 27,
1999.
December 31
CF&CS Investigation Report, Miss
Laycock: "JANE HAS DISCLOSED BEING SEXUALLY TOUCHED BY HER HALF-BROTHER YOSEF.
PARENTS HAVE TAKEN MEASURES TO ENSURE THAT ALL CHILDREN IN THE HOME ARE
PROTECTED. PARENTS HAVE HAD A SEXUALLY INTRUSIVE FOSTER CHILD PLACED WITH THEM
PREVIOUSLY AND HAVE HAD TRAINING IN DEALING WITH SEXUALLY INTRUSIVE CHILDREN.
MANAGERS HAVE DIRECTED THAT 24HOUR/DAY HOMEMAKERS WILL BE IN THE HOME AT LEAST
UNTIL THE POLICE INTERVIEW HAS BEEN DONE. "
Acting supervisor Pirito: "The Fishers have
been very appropriate and cooperative. They are installing an alarm on Josef's
bedroom door. Also Bev Kerr has suggested, and resources agrees, that homemakers
be put into the home to help with supervision and support, as an interim
measure. We would like to have a meeting regarding the situation on Jan. 6 at
11:00 a.m. at 1175 W. Brdwy. This is not a protocol investigation as yet but the
issues must be reviewed and planning done re the safety of all the children."
Ms. Pirito refused our request to be present, explaining: “We will find what is
the best for your family.” After ten years of hope, tireless work and
sacrifices, 15 minutes before our first New Year together, instead of
celebrating happy future, grateful to the country that allowed us to live
together, second Homemaker invaded our home and controlled our children's
bedrooms.
1998
January 5
Sexual Offences Unit, Det/Cst McCluskie,
first Sexual Offences Squad Investigation: prohibited father's presence,
threatened the child with imprisonment. A risk of repeat: Not expected. Charges:
No.
January 7
Commenced the "Investigation of Allegations
of Abuse and Neglect in Foster Homes ", under the "Protocol: to be used by
manager upon receipt of any report that a foster parent has sexually abused,
physically or emotionally neglected/abused a child in foster parents care." RSW
for our support Ms. Levin, who met us a first time, and Miss Laycock threatened
us to apprehend all children except Joe, or to apprehend Joe, if he and parents
will sign the Voluntary Care Agreement.
January 8
Ms. Levin proposed her friend, the RSW, MSW,
Family and Children's Therapist, Mental Health Consultant Alvarez to do Joe’s
Risk Assessment. We agreed. Mr. Alvarez between January 15, and April 16
mentally tortured Joe. He opened his sessions ´the torture is starting´ and
called Joe ´TONTO´, not in a privacy of an office, but in our child's keepers
kitchen, with Morans (foster parents with just one previous experience they gave
up the next day) going in and out. Prohibited him to speak what was going on in
together ten sessions, 2-3 hours long. Thus Joe on Friday sessions lost whole
school day. Mr. Alvarez repeatedly refused to meet us. Ms. Levin delivered
us his plan to meet us, but after his work will be finished, and his demand that
we do not thwart his work by asking Joe anything about his sessions. Until the
end of the school-year, Joe was every school day twice humiliated in front of
his classmates, when cabdrivers picked and delivered him between school and
unsafe Foster home. Mr. Alvarez never administered a single psychological test,
never contacted people who know parents and the child to collect vital
information. Nobody yet denounced Mr. Alvarez's extremely cruel and harmful
perversities. On the contrary, Mr. Alvarez received the fullest support of the
Greater Vancouver Family Services, Greater Vancouver Mental Health Services
Society, and the Board of Registration for Social Workers.
January 9
We were forced to sign: "I am temporarily
unable to care for my child(ren) in my home because: Assessment of Joe’s
behaviour is requested." The part “The children’s views” Miss Laycock left
empty. Description of Plan of Care: “Joe will receive counselling from Enrique
Monje-Alvarez”. We told Joe to sign the Voluntary Care Agreement with us,
decided to leave Canada as soon as possible and forever. Jane was ordered to
receive a therapy from Sheehan M.A., Child and Family Therapist Vancouver Incest
& Sexual Abuse Centre (VISAC).
January 12
We hand-delivered the first six from about
five millions written requests for help, to first six government officials: "Up
today we were not presented with opportunity to present all facts and we are not
aware of any immediate plan from the ministry to resolve this crisis. Due to
extreme seriousness of situation we would appreciate the respond from
authorities to our request as soon as possible. To continue in our effort to
help our children we would rate highly the opportunity to meet with authorities,
reevaluate the situation, and draw the conclusion, so we can take the necessary
steps to resume our normal lives." Our first request for help remains completely
ignored.
Excerpts torn out of context from the second
request for help (the last sentence: "Please make decisions fully in the spirit
and the letter of CF&CSA, decent and OBVIOUS.") served at court
proceedings as the evidence that social workers "reasonably, in all the
circumstances, fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to
them."
The third request for help (the last
sentence: "Safety and well being of our children is and will be always our
priority, in spite of all efforts of abusers."), together with supporting
letters from people what know us, served to question our sanity.
January 14
Miss Laycock at Joe’s school warned the
Principal and teachers against, according to her, dangerous sexual offender.
Joe’s Family Counselor Ms. Fidler, RSW and one of a few people who knew both
parents and child, offered Miss Laycock to do Joe’s Risk Assessment, in her
office, and free of charge. Miss Laycock refused, lying that parents had asked
the Ministry to put Joe into a Foster home and to close school. Father reported
committed crimes to Det/CstMcCluskie. Det/CstMcCluskie did not make any notes,
did not fill any Report, and refused to call Joe's teacher Ms Lowther as a
witness. He said to call Miss Laycock the next day. No records that such call
was ever made exists. To ask government officials to stop crimes committed with
unspeakable cruelty against a 12-years-old child is for unworthy of any response
for most of them. For the rest of them, seeking their help is Criminal
harassment and mental illness.
January 15
We reported criminal acts of social workers to the Office of the Advocate for Child, Youth and Family.
We reported criminal acts of social workers to the Office of the Advocate for Child, Youth and Family.
January 16
Ms. Sheehan commenced six sessions with our
daughter. She refused our presence and our requests to videotape her sessions.
From her Report of March, 24: "Jane was referred because of several incidents of
sexual abuse by her twelve-year-old step brother, Joe, during the fall of 1997
and disclosed to her mother on December 24, 1997. Robin Laycock, investigating
social worker, referred Jane to our program on January 8 for therapy to address
the effects of the abuse. At the time of referral she was reportedly engaged in
temper tantrums, and expressing considerable guilt about getting people in
trouble. Conclusion and Recommendations: Josef’s position has been that it is
his son who is the victim, of the system, and this view did not shift during our
brief work together. Jane would be unable to do the necessary therapeutic work
knowing her parents are unsupportive and she would be in the position of
choosing loyalty to her family over therapy for herself. I have asked Jane’s
parents to arrive at a joint decision with respect to her continuing in therapy,
and to then inform me."
January 30
I met with the Advocate for the Child, Youth
and Family Mr. Rupert and left with him a written complaint about criminal
behavior of social workers. Mr. Rupert has promised me to find, according to
what the law is our child held in state custody. He then called Miss Laycock.
Almost a year later Mr. Rupert learned about the existence of, and was very
surprised when we showed him the Ministry Complaint Process Policy
Manual.
Ms. Trogerlich, teaching Jane six hours
every school day, wrote to Ms. Sheehan: "In January I heard about what happened
between Yosef and Jane from the principal, as well as from Ms. Fisher. I was
amazed as I had not noticed any changes in Jane’s behaviour or emotional state."
Ms. Sheehan excluded for the Ministry and her own intents unfit truth, replacing
it with lies.
February 11
Det/Cst McCluskie elaborated the Record
about his Investigation from January 5: "I found him to be sincere, polite and
extremely remorseful. Joseph admitted to each and every incident. He cried
through his entire interview and on several occasion commented on the pain he
has caused his entire family. Fisher was now considering suicide as a remedy to
the problems he had caused. It is obvious to me that Joseph’s family suffered a
lot since these incidents. I have spoken with the agent from the Ministry who
agrees with me that Joseph is a very immature young boy with a lot of mature
adult problems. It is my opinion that subjecting this boy through our Criminal
Justice System at this point would only serve to cause more distress to not only
Joseph but his entire family. This is a situation that warrants a remedy through
counseling and therapy. To subject the accused and his family to anything else
would only serve to degrade the situation more. I have consulted with the
Ministry who agree and support my conclusion. The information regarding these
assaults is now documented and on file if in the future it is learned that
Joseph did not respond well to counseling or therapy. This is not a result that
I anticipate. As a result I will be concluding this investigation with no
charges. CLEARED BY OTHER MEANS DUE TO THE AGE AND UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE
OFFENDER."
February 19
We received the "Investigating Allegations
of abuse and Neglect in Foster Homes": "The investigation found no grounds to
close your foster home, or to remove the foster children presently placed with
you. However, some conditions have been placed on this decision: 1) That a third
child will not be placed in your home for the next several months. 2) That both
of you attend family counselling, either with VISACS (presently involved) or
with any other agency. 3) That you will be involved and cooperate with the care
plan for Joseph Jr. as determined by the social worker. Shanie Levin, your
resource worker, will continue to provide you with support and consultation.
Thank you for your cooperation throughout the process." In response, we
hand-delivered two requests for help. Ms. Levin responded with indignant call
why I wrote such a "thing", "instead of speaking with her or Robin". We
reported this proof of blackmail by phone to the Children’s
Commission.
February 23
Miss Laycock’s Investigation Report: "there
is no evidence that the parents are sexually abusing any child in the home, nor
there is evidence that the parents are not protecting the children. These
categories are used due to lack of more appropriate categories." (By categories
she means her two initial lies she copied from the section 13 of the Child,
Family and Society Act on December 31, 1997)
March 2
Joe’s teacher Ms. Lowther: "There are two
factors in Yosef’s life that I know have been constant sources of encouragement
and support: his father, and his stepmother. They are concerned parents, they
are caring parents, and they have been doing a wonderful job at keeping Yosef as
well-organized, calm and happy as possible. Mr. and Ms. Fisher have done an
amazing job at portraying what could be a lifelong scar instead as positive
learning situation. They have done an equally amazing job with Jane at the same
time, from what little I have observed and learned. I look forward to this boy
getting settled back with his parents."
March 5
I hand-delivered the above, and four more
support letters to the Ministry. Resources Team Manager Ms. Samija solved our
third request for help immediately. She ordered us by phone to meet her just
three hours later. Then she blackmailed us to undergo our mental health
assessment, or immediately take away our last foster children. Ms. Samija
already had booked two sessions for both of us, with Psychiatrist Dr.
Armstrong.
March 23
We cancelled the Voluntary Care Agreement.
Joe was not liberated. His social worker Mr. Partridge and his Clinical
Supervisor Lebel threatened to charge Joe with sexual assault, in front of all
children. We explained them "the Criminal Code exception for sexual interference
"no person aged 12 or 13 years shall be tried." Canadian Criminal Code is non
functional neither to deter and punish abusers of powers, nor to protect the
rights and lives of their victims. Such is Canadian reality, perfectly confirmed
by silent consent and by responses to our requests for help.
April 9, Good Friday
We refused to sign another Voluntary Care
Agreement. Again we explained to Mr. Partridge and Ms. Lebel the Criminal Code
exception. They left our home with threats that had worked before, and repeated
these a few times in front of our children: that they would return with the
police to drag away all our children. Joe remained in illegal State custody for
his first Easter in Canada. I stayed at home with our last foster child. My wife
with our own children escaped the planned abduction to the USA.
April 13
Ms. Lowther: "I feel increased concern for
the stress felt by this boy because he has still not been returned to his home.
What are we governmental figures doing to this child? Please allow him to return
to his sister and his parents. Please return him to his family."
Tuesday after Easter
Mr. Partridge got Ms. Lowther’s second
begging letter. He explicitly prohibited Joe to participate at the Court Hearing
about him, not to miss his classes. He tried to send back us too, lying that the
Court proceeding was cancelled, due to our lawyer Davison's absence. Mr.
Partridge and the Ministry lawyer Mr. Volker committed perjuries: "The child’s
development is likely to be seriously impaired by a treatable condition and the
child’s parent refuses to provide or consent to treatment." And: "The child’s
parent is unable or unwilling to care for the child and has not made adequate
provision for the child’s care." Honorable judge refused to hear anything at all
from us. We were not allowed to defend our child against the malice and cruelty
of public servants. She even refused to tell us why, scolding us: "You’re
wasting the court time."
April 17
Our support worker Ms. Levin received our
request to testify in next Court proceeding about our excellent parenting and
care about our foster children. She did not respond, and never testified. Ms.
Samija faxed to Mr. Partridge regarding Joe’s teacher begging letters: "this
woman’s statements are disturbing. What credentials does she have to make these
statements?" Like Ms. Trogerlich, Ms. Lowther was teaching Joe since the last
September, six hours every school day. Ms. Lowther was later for her statements
reprimanded by her Principal and by the Vancouver School Board.
April 29
Quality Assurance Manager Ms. Clarke: "I
received your recent request for forms regarding investigation of criminal
activities of various Ministry for Children and Families social work
staff."
May 1
Mr. Alvarez‘s Report: "Mental Status":
"Joseph is Mulatto in appearance. Joseph would benefit from Penile
Plethysmography" (he planned, together with his friend (Dr. Janke?), measuring
erections when watching kiddies’ and other pornography). Being a handsome,
charming, friendly, and pleasant youngster, these are attributes that may pose a
risk. I believe Joseph probably should have been charged for sexually touching
his sister." Nobody was concerned about the lack of a single psychological test,
or that Mr. Alvarez never contacted a single person who knows Joe and us, to
obtain vitally important information. The same day we hand-delivered Joe‘s
decision, with our consent, to return to his homeland.
A few hours later, Ms. Lowther faxed us:
"Immediately after I spoke to you, Mrs. Fisher, I wrote and sent the following
fax to my old companera Libby Davies. I then showed the fax to Josef. He studied
it intelligently. He taught me the word "esperanza" = we hope. Without hope we
do not have life. I want Josef to live. So, he must have hope." "Personal
message, please, for Libby, from Ruth Lowther: Libby, how are you? I sincerely
appreciate how busy you must be. I need to have a few minutes with you, if you
could spare any time? It is about my student, Josef Fisher-Delis, an immigrant
from Cuba. His father is Czech. It does relate to the prov. Min. of Child/Fam,
who are severely hurting his family. But now the lawyer has no choice but to
involve the Charter of Rights and the Human Rights. Thanks Libby." "Mr. and Ms.
Fisher, I will persue Libby. I am certain that she will speak with me. I will
also consult Svend Robinson. They will know what we can do. Please do not send
Josef to Cuba yet. Hold on. It is a terrible struggle, I realize. But for the
health of the boy, he must have hope. There are still some things that can be
done. And…… you are not alone."
We are not alone. Generations of native
children's lives were ruined and terminated by monsters sworn and paid to act in
their best interests. To illustrate Canadian moral values, compassion, equality
before and under the law etc., six years later, one of those MPs stole a $
65,000.00 worth wedding gift for his homosexual lover. Our MP, his lover and Mr.
Robinson cuddled together, when crying thief admitted his theft. Mr. Robinson
served 100 hours of community service, no criminal record.
May 5
Dr. Farmer "To All Whom It May Concern: Over
the years I have dealt with the family on many occasions. I have always been
impressed by the caring and respectful manner in which the Fishers treat their
children. It is impossible to sense any difference in the care given to their
biological versus their foster children. The Fishers are a very intelligent
couple and extremely compliant and conscientious. During these trying times for
Iva and Josef Fisher, their love and compassion for all of their children has
been paramount."
Ms. Lebel: "I don’t trust Enrique
Assessment, due to his own lack of qualifications. I also strongly believe that
if something happened in that home, I doubt that the Fishers' would report it.
Especially if Yoseph re-offended. The working relationship with the Ministry has
broken down to the point of the Fischers’ maliciously attacking workers and (
anyone for that matter) who has a different point of the situation. They should
be hold accountable for their behavior. This new situation has come up that’s
very stressful for them. Mr. Fisher’s ability to cope under stress is
questionable. I know we have all been questioning his mental health. I think he
is "a time bomb waiting to explode" and worry about how that is going to occur.
By the way, did any of you receive a copy of the letter Jane's therapist from
VISAC received from Mr. Fisher. I just saw it for the first time and again
raises more concern."
Being Canadian government official is the
best job for perverts, pedophiles, sadists and their colleagues in office:
catering own needs to brutalize and ruin lives of poor children and their
families, being above the law, immune to prosecution, and paid for the
protection of the rights, health and life children. Who else than perfectly
deceived public would ever pay for the cruellest psychological abuse of
children? Anyone who is not a complete idiot and is familiar with the most basic
facts of the F-case, must reach the same conclusion like four months earlier did
the Vancouver Police ("subjecting this boy through our Criminal Justice System
at this point would only serve to cause more distress to not only Joseph but his
entire family.”), assess motive, means and opportunities. That the father of
tortured child wants to burn himself alive in protest? How convenient! And what
if he kills his entire family? Or if he chops of the head of Mr. Alvarez, or the
Attorney General? Or rips huge bellies of Miss Laycock, or the Fishers
representative of their interests in Ottawa - be able to see their futile
attempts to stuff their intestines back? The murder of several children in some
preschool would certainly capture attention of the Vancouver Sun, The Province,
CBC and the public. Noncommissioned officer Tim McVeigh killed 168 people in
Oklahoma government building. Army officer specializing in weapons of mass
destruction, original profession chemist could create a new record, because,
unlike Tim, he would not plan to survive his action. Government officials
naturally hate the slightest opposition or criticism of their actions from
second class citizens, from whom they have the boundless contempt and thus
despise and violate their rights and freedoms, including the right to life.
Responses to our requests for help and the Threat Assessment from June 2000 are
the best evidence.
May 7
Mothers' Day. Social workers apprehended our
last foster child from his preschool. After being one family for over two years,
we were not even allowed to give him his clothes, toys and say
good-bye.
May 8
The Preschool Manager Ms. Clark: "It has
been brought to my attention about the situation going on in the Fisher home. I
had no idea and I am very surprised. Not only I was shocked about what happened,
but how it was dealt with by the government officials. We are all professionals
looking out for the best interests of the children so why are they having to
suffer like this? Yesterday, May 7th, my class was interrupted by Ministry
officials who came in and took Jonah from our room. As for Iva and Josef, these
two people are very caring and loving individuals. I am still in shock over what
this poor family has been suffering through these past four months, although
honestly you would never known it by looking at them. Iva and Josef have got to
be the strongest people I have ever met. Even though their family has been torn
apart and their hearts have been shattered; they still hold up their heads,
smile, and are the best parents they can be. I hope that this mess will be
cleaned up soon and their lives can get back to normal."
May 12
Children’s Commission External Complaints
Director Jones:”Because the complaint resolution process is available to you,
the Children’s Commission is unable to accept your complaint at this time and
will close our file.”
May 19
Our Honorable MLA MacPhail: “I appreciate
that this is a very difficult and stressful time for you. I have taken the
liberty of forwarding your letter to my colleague, the Honourable Lois Boone,
Minister for Children and Families so she can investigate and respond to your
letter.”
May 21
From: Bev Taylor "Object: The F case As a
follow up to my meeting with the F’s. I called Wally Rupert of the Advocates
office to advise him that Joe is now saying he is willing to return to
Cuba……does the Advocate’s office have an opinion on that. I also discussed with
Wally the family’s request that Joe have legal counsel and that Legal Aid said
MCF will arrange that. Wally seemed to concur with that. The name and number of
his contact in the AG’s is Susan Leslie 356-8433."
May 22
Joe’s foster parents accused him of stealing
$40.00 they did not pay for his School Camping Trip. Morans’, like foster
parents do every time, always used checks, never cash. Ms. Fidler translated for
the Ministry Joe's "School Reports from the years 1990 – 1997: The information
provided by various teachers indicate that Yosef was a good student. That he had
an academic performance appropriate for his age, that his social behaviour was
positive and that he participated actively in cultural and physical activities.
Other observation noted over the years is regarding his family environment. It
is described as affectionate between family members and of the family being
interested in the child’s education and school performance."
Five months later, Ms. Taylor instructed Ms.
Berggren-Clive and Ms. Lebel: "Please, write International Social Services
asking them if they can do a check in Cuba to ascertain if Joe did have any
previous record for sexual abuse or sexual assault."
May 25
Ms. Lebel: "I got throughthis note the other
day then had to run, so here is another attempt. I got throughto Sgt. H . They
are reopening the case. They have to interview both Joe and Jane, which he
hthinks can start this week. I told him it is not likely he will be truthful, so
he has th reports of both Enriquez and VISAC. I also let him know my view of the
police assessing whether Joseph was high risk in the first place. It's a
learning experience for us all."
May 27
Sexual Offences Squad, Det/Cst McCluskie,
re-investigation of the case on January 5 "CLEARED BY OTHER MEANS DUE TO THE AGE
AND UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE OFFENDER": Charges: Yes. Offense: Sexual
assault.
May 28
Mr. Partridge: “I’ve had chance to discus
the Fisher’s request to have a lawyer appointed to Yosef with our counsel (V.
Helmut in consultation with R. Stewart). Volker’s advice is that this would not
be helpful to our case at the current stage in the CF and CS Act proceedings and
that Yosef’s views are already well-known. Volker also reports that if the Child
Advocate’s office felt that it was absolutely necessary to have counsel
appointed they could contact the Min of the Attorney General themselves”.
Quality Assurance Assistant Ms. Freeman: ”If you believe there are criminal
issues, you should contact your local police to discuss these matters as the
Ministry has no role in criminal investigations."
June 3
Miss Laycock accused me of assaulting her
ass in a bus. Before exiting, I said in low-key voice: "Ty kurvo zasraná, tys
zničila moji rodinu." She does not understand Czech, thus the translation (You
filthy whore, you destroyed my family) is irrelevant. Accusation that I touched
her body is repulsive lie. Three witnesses could testify that I had only a
backpack on my back. Miss Laycock: "noted Mr. Fisher was carrying a plastic
shopping bag which contained several objects, one of which looked like a large
orange or grapefruit. I went directly to my office and made a report to the
police."
Greater Vancouver Mental Health
Services Society, Ms. Ratner, M.S.W, YRCS, M.Ed., Ph.D. Taylor, Counsellor,
PARC: “we have added your letter and comments to Yosef’s file as an amendment to
the assessment by Enrique Monje-Alvarez”.
June 4
Const. Scorrar, "Report to Crown Counsel:
Proposed Charges; Assault Level 1 266 CCC 1. Did the accused make a statement?
NO 2. Was the accused informed at the time of arrest or detention of the reasons
therefore? YES 3. Are the exact words said to the accused re reasons for arrest
or detention as set out below? YES 4. Was the accused informed at the time of
arrest or detention of his right to retain and instruct counsel without delay?
YES 5. Are all circumstances of the accused’s exercise of his right to retain
and instruct counsel without delay as set out below? YES." Const. Scorrar never
saw, met or spoke with me. Fabricating evidence and lying to achieve own goals
is common, natural conduct of Canadian policemen. No reasonable person will ever
trust anything what policemen said or wrote.
June 11
Mr. Partridge to Dr. Adams: "Thank you for
accepting Yosef Fisher Delis (D.O.B. 1985 March 08) for psychological
assessment. Mr. Alvarez (who I understand has some background in forensic work
with sex offenders) was assigned to interview Yosef (please see enclosed report
by Mr. Alvarez)." Miss Laycock to Acting Clinical Supervisor Goodman: "Subject
police action regarding assault. Teresa, I spoke with Alex Hovbrender from SOS
yesterday. Sgt. Hovbrender anticipates that Det. McClucskey will be meeting with
Mr. Fisher early next week at which time he will be arrested and charged with
assault. Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana." VISAC Coordinator
Melchenchuk: "I have considered your complaint and wish to inform you, as
Heidi's Clinical Supervisor, that I concur with her assessment and
recommendations regarding your family." Ms. Melchenchuk never spoke or met us,
and failed to inform us that we should complain at Ms. Sheehan’s abuse of our
daughter and fraud and at their cover up by the Greater Vancouver Family
Services to the B.C. Association of Clinical Counsellors.
June 17
Sexual Offences Squad, Sgt. Hovbrender and
Det/Cst McCluskie, investigation of reasonable fears and distress of social
workers and Joe's foster parents. I presented them a copy of the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms, with a list of my child's violated rights.
Charges: No. A deal: reunion of my family, for the end of complaining, plus an
apology to Miss Laycock and Mr. Partridge. Det/Cst McClucskie in good-humor
patted the Charter: "all this is a bullshit." Intentional destroying of my
family and responses to our requests for help guarantying the continuity of the
lawlessness prove that perfectly.
June 18
Mr. Partridge: "Police emphasized to Mr.
Fisher the seriousness of Yosef’s offence against his sister and how he must
allow his children to get help. Mr. Fisher was devastated when he heard Yosef
could have been charged and that Police would charge him if he refused to get
help (assessment/therapy). This is something we’ve tried telling Mr. Fisher all
along but he needed to hear it from the police. Later this morning Mr. Fisher
himself called me to apologize for what he’s done wrong and thanked me for my
"way of communicating". Hopefully with the tremendous assistance of the Police,
this will help address some of the safety concerns for the foster parents and
MCF staff. Perhaps we also may be able to work in a more cooperative manner with
Mr. Fisher in trying to provide help to Yosef and Jane." Nobody objects
the reality that organized ruining of the health and lives of powerless children
is called help in Canada.
June 22
Dr. Farmer cancelled some appointments with
his patients and whole afternoon in vain waited to testify in our behalf. Mr.
Partridge trained Joe's new social worker and testified that the Ministry must
apprehend Jane, if Joe was allowed to live at home with his family . Honorable
Judge Auxier: "the child be in the interim custody of the Director until a
further order is made, that a hearing shall commence on July 23, 1998, to
determine if the child is in need of protection." Reasonable persons know that
powerless Canadian children’s the greatest need of protection is against corrupt
liars and oppressors in positions of power and paid to protect
them.
June 24
Mr. Partridge: "The Crown Counsel Query: I
didn’t think there was sufficient evidence to lay assault charge. However, I
have laid an 810. Please, obtain statements from the two community professionals
who rec’d comments from Fisher about Laycock. This will better the evidence of
the grounds for her fear. Also, please obtain a copy of the letter Fisher wrote
to Laycock after this incident."
I wrote nothing to Miss Laycock since the
second requests for help on February 19. I called her on June 18, after or
before calling Mr. Partridge and left an apologetic message for her, as the
police wanted, in exchange for a speedy reunion of my family. I believed to save
Joe’s vacations at Cuba, promised a long time before he decided to live with us
in Canada. Thanks to the Government of Canada's oppression, Joe never saw his
homeland again.
June 30
Attorney General Mr. Dosanjh, whose help we
sought from March, 31: "If you have any evidence that a crime has been
committed, I would urge you to bring that evidence to the attention of the
police in the jurisdiction where the alleged crime took place." Done, on January
14. During his first summer vacation in Canada, instead of visiting his family
and homeland, Joe was still unlawfully detained, learning in another foster home
how to use drugs.
July 7
I hand-delivered "NOTES FOR THE MEETING" to
the Ministry and the police: "we are deprived of Basic Human Rights - Breach of
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms S. 2 (b), S.6 (1), S.12, S. 14, S. 15
(1)."
July 8
The Ministry and the Sexual Offences Unit
organized the Integrated Case Management. We met Joe there, delivered by his
second foster parent. Ms. Lowther repeated her offer, ignored since April: to
rent a room to my son and me in her house. The Ministry refused, explaining that
it cannot be done without a Study if she and her house are acceptable by the
Ministry’s standards. Government Officials then planned, in Joe's presence:
"There was a brief discussion regarding the option available to the police in
this case. The two options discussed were Diversion and recommending that the
crown approve charges. Tom and Alex pointed out that it was not usual in cases
of sexual assault involving force to use the diversion option. The police and
Crown are reviewing the most appropriate way to proceed in this
matter."
One not Spanish speaking red-haired planner
introduced himself to be the Ministry of AG lawyer from Victoria, to represent
Joe's best interests. For months we sought a Spanish speaking one. It did not
matter; he objected nothing, propounded nothing, and when he was leaving, we
asked him what he thought. He thought that not our son, but our daughter should
be parented by the Ministry for Children and Families. Without our non-violent
resistance, the Ministry would have destroyed the health and lives of all our
children.
July 9
To the Ministry (Mr. Dawson), Children's
Commission (Mr. Jones), Ombudsman (Ms. Hughes): "Abuse and discrimination of our
family continues, grows and even is planned to go for the next six months by
third SW in charge of our son Yosef, Ms. Berggren-Clive and her supervisors.
OUR BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED AND NOBODY CARES!!!"
July 10
Ms. Berggren-Clive and Ms. Lebel’s "Summary:
Dr. Adams has considerable experience working with youth who have sexually
offended. After receiving the Director’s material about this offence, Dr. Adams
believes Yosef should have been charged after the offence; he has stated that
the only effective treatment is available through the criminal justice system
and Dr. Adams concurs with the Director’s view that the child should be living
outside the home away from the victim." Ms. Sheehan and Mr. Alvarez’s lies
are, like public servants’ perjuries, the perfect "Director’s material" for the
Ministry, police, crown counsels and judges.
July 14
Prominent Canadian law firm McLachlan Brown
Anderson, Mr. Volker "to the Ministry, Attention: Kathy Berggren-Clive: In
response to the parents indications that they may send the child back to Cuba as
on August 1, 1998, the parents do not have authority to make this decision.
Under Section 47 of the Child, Family and Community Service Act, the Director
has the right and responsibility to exercise guardianship of the child during
the course of an interim order. The decision will be yours as to whether you are
in agreement with the child returning to Cuba or wish him to remain here to
undergo the assessment and counselling as arranged." Mr. Volker now provides his
legal expertises of the A/Director, Planning and Research to the Vancouver
Police.
August 6
Dr. Adams’ Risk Assessment: "Yosef wishes to
return home and his parents concur. They feel prepared to protect all of their
children from similar incidents in the future. Letters were reviewed which
showed much respect for the parents parenting skills and love for their
children, and for Yosef’s generally good character. I do not recommend charging
him with the sexual acting out before a Youth Court. I recommend that he is
permitted to return home, once appropriate precautions are taken, such as the
door alarm and other common sense considerations." Specification: Joe wishes to
get out of Canada and his parents concur, because it is their common yearning
and plan, since January 8.
August 14
Board of Registration for Social Workers’
Investigator Ms. Grunberg: "Mr. and Mrs. Fisher were so threatened by Mr.
Alvarez’s report and recommendations that they desperately sought to destroy him
rather than face the seriousness of the issues. It is my observation that he
acted professionally and ethically, with his clients’ best interest at heart. It
is my finding that at no time did RSW Alvarez and RSW Levin act unprofessionally
or unethically in carrying their duties." Here it is, in black and white: lying
and excruciation of powerless children and families is professional and ethical
carrying duties for Canadian government officials. Nobody ever objected Ms.
Grunberg’s conclusion. A few years later she was appointed a member of the
Board.
August 27
During the last week of Joe’s summer
vacation, Ms. Berggren-Clive blackmailed us to voluntarily sign a Supervision
Order for the next six months. Would we refuse, Joe would suffer in illegal
state custody for the next 183 days, on top of the 270 days of time served. We
signed the Court Order that we "shall allow the Director or his delegates to
interview both children, without the presence of the parents, as often as the
Director or his delegates deem necessary." Before signing that signing of the
Court Order was voluntary, I publicly, in the Courthouse, stated to kill anyone
who would try to abduct my children again.
September 11
Child Protection Manager Ms. Northrup: "I
have determined that there were two errors in practice. First Ms. Laycock should
have discussed the Voluntary Care Agreement with Yosef. Second, and interpreter
should have been present. Other than those two instances, I have found no
difficulties around Ms. Laycock's practice. Ms. Laycock's decisions were made in
conjunction with her clinical supervisor and with the acting Child Protection
Manager." The conjunction how destroy our family by all means is unanimous,
nobody else has found any difficulties around Miss Laycock's lies and
perjuries.
September 14
Police Report to Crown Counsel: "Proposed
Charges: Uttering Threats s. 264.1 CCC, Criminal Harassment s. 264.20(b).
ARRESTED." Before January 20, 1999, someone falsified data in this Report
(Report submitted to Crown: 98-09-16.)
September 15
I filled my first complaint against the
police. The next morning, Det/Cst McCluskie for a first time arrested me.
Without a Warrant. Charges: Uttering threats. Impostor with the first name
Margaret, impersonating the Justice of Peace tricked me to sign an "Undertaking:
no contact with Ms Laycock and Ms. Berggren-Clive", lying that it is valid only
until the next Court proceeding. The perfect Justice Entrapment: under the less
than three weeks older Court Order I am ordered to be in contact with Joe's
third social worker for the next six months.
September 17
Crown Counsel to Ms. Berggren-Clive: "I
would be upset too if my child was taken away." Following day, Ms.
Berggren-Clive called "back to Crown Counsel to let her know I was not happy
with the way she treated me - making it look like I had done something wrong.
She apologized and stated that she was frustrated with the police and their
procedures in how they handled this." No matter how much frustrated Canadian
government officials in position of power are with the police conduct, all of
them always maximally cooperate to achieve and then cover up illegal acts
against second class citizens.
September 21
The Honourable Anne McLellan, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General for Canada: “In my role as Attorney General, I
represent the Crown in all cases involving the Government of Canada. I can only
suggest that you seek the advice of a lawyer in private practice, who can advise
you as to what courses of action are available to you. If this is not
financially possible, you may wish to consult with the legal aid office.
Further, if you have not already done so, you may wish to bring your concerns to
the attention of the Honourable Penny Priddy, British Columbia’s Minister for
Children and Families”.
Quality Assurance Manager Clarke: “In your
letters to me you have asked for an opportunity to meet and I agree that this
may be helpful. Once you have received my letter summarizing the status of your
complaints, I would be pleased to meet with you.”
The Legal Aid: ”Your problem is not covered
by Legal Aid."
The same day I received Crown Counsel Report
#98-207953: "Evidence of Berggren-Clive, Kathy: This witness will testify that;
Josef Fisher had been removed from the home several months earlier as a result
of sexual assault investigation which determined that Josef Fisher had sexually
assaulted his seven year old step-sister on a number of occasions in the family
home over a six months period. Joseph Fisher was interviewed and admitted to the
police that he had in fact sexually assaulted his younger sister over a period
of approximately 6 months. The reason that Josef Fisher was not charged at the
time of the incident was partly because he is the product of a relationship that
his father had been involved in several years ago in Cuba, prior to his present
marriage. Detective McCluskie conducted an investigation and determined that
there was sufficient evidence to support a criminal charge of Section 271 C.C.C.
Sexual Assault."
FYI: Sexual assault S. 271. "Every one who
commits a sexual assault is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or an offence punishable on
summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen
months." Sexual interference S. 151. "Every person who, for a sexual purpose,
touches, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, any
part of the body of a person under the age of fourteen years is guilty of an
indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years
and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of forty-five days; or is
guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding eighteen months and to a minimum punishment of
imprisonment for a term of fourteen days". S.150.1.(3): "No person aged 12 or 13
years shall be tried for an offence under S. 151."
October 10
Network Manager Ms. Taylor: ”I have reviewed
the matter in this office, and can find no professional wrongdoings on the part
of Charles Partridge, nor on the part of Kathy Berggren-Clive." No
other government official so far found any professional wrongdoings in
destroying my child's health and life.
October 21
Preschool Manager Ms. Clark, to Quality
Assurance Manager Clarke: "I wish that all of this torture to the Fishers family
would end. This is an amazing family who loves each other very much. I hope you
can do something to help them bring their family back together again." Ms.
Lebel, Network Manager Ms. Taylor and Ms. Samija immediately solved it: like Ms.
Lowther, Ms. Clark was reprimanded by her superiors for obstructing the
Ministry's goals.
November 2
BC Civil Liberties Association, Mr. Mollard:
“Unfortunately, we are not able to assist you with your concerns”.
November 11
Canadian Human Rights Commission: “The CHRC
does not have jurisdiction over provincial ministries and departments. You may
wish to contact the BC Human Rights Commission”.
November 17
Application to the Family Court to Cancel
the Supervision Order. "The reason: We will prove that the Court was defrauded
by disobeying CF&CSA and by Perjury committed on June 15 & 22 by Charles
Partridge."
BRSW, Mr. Van Den Assem: "Thank you for
your letter of November 16, 1998, giving formal notice of your wish to appeal
the Practice Review Committee’s decision with respect to your complaint
concerning the social work practice conduct/practice of Enrique Monje-Alvarez,
RSW."November 26
Quality Assurance Assistant Ms. Sundhu to
Joe: “I have been in contact with Wally Rupert from the Child, Youth and Family
Advocate’s office and I understand that he will be providing you with support
and will advocate on your behalf throughout this process.”
November 30
"BC Human Rights Commission, Ms. van der
Boom: “I regret that we are unable to assist you in this matter.”
December 2
”Passionate advocate for children's issues”,
Critic for the Ministry of Children and Families, future Minister Ms. Clark:
“You have raised some very serious questions with respect to the Ministry of
Children and Families. Linda Reid will continue the work to ensuring that the
well being of British Columbia’s children are looked after. I will forward on
your letter to the new critic, Linda Reid”.
December 3
Network Manager Ms.Taylor: ”Myself, Renye,
and Kathy all received faxes dated at 6:24 this morning. The letters are all the
same (complaining about criminal code infractions, and all the Charter of Rights
violations, etc etc.) Do you or your staff want this letters?” Ms. Northrup: “Of
course, I want my letter!”. Ms. Northrup: “I consider the letter as an indirect
communication or attempt thereof with Robin. I would suggest that you call Alex
around this. I would not mind getting a copy. I will not give it to Robin”. Ms.
Taylor: “As you know, Alex is away today. The understanding clearly states he
will have no contact, direct or indirect, with Robin or with Kathy. I am loath
to have him thrown in jail for this, but . . . “ But the end justifies the
means for every thug.
December 4
Leader of the Official Opposition Honorable
Campbell: "Thanks for your letter regarding the Ministry for Children and
Families. We are very aware of the many issues surrounding the policies and
services of this Ministry. We have often raised them in the Legislature and we
are met with a Minister who does not respond or cannot respond or responds with
only a limited amount of information. I would suggest you to try to discuss your
concerns with the District Manager, to determine what course you can take to
ensure your complaint proceeds. I wish you all the best." Honorable Campbell was
since then twice elected to Premier. He appointed a lot of Ministers who, with a
handful of exceptions, do not respond to our requests for their help at all. The
exceptions are either meaningless responses, or threats.
December 7
Police Complaint Commissioner Mr. Morrison
QC: "WHEREAS the Discipline Authority has summarily dismissed the public trust
complaint AND WHEREAS the Police Complaint Commissioner has examined the
Discipline Authority’s decision and the reasons for the summary dismissal; AND
WHEREAS the Police Complaint Commissioner has reviewed the criminal proceedings
against the complainant and involving the respondents THE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMS
the discipline Authority’s decision to summarily dismiss the complaint, as there
is no reasonable likelihood that further investigation would produce evidence of
a public trust default."
FYI: "When someone is arrested and tried for
a crime, it is up to the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the
person is guilty, and if that is not proven, then the person is treated as if
they are innocent." Not in Canada, as our case proves many times.
December 8
Regional Operating Officer Mr. Milowsky: "A
tremendous amount of effort by my staff has gone into trying to resolve your
complaints. With respect to your complaints alleging criminal behaviour by
ministry staff, we have assessed your complaints and do not concur with your
conclusions. Of course, you have the right to pursue your allegations with the
police directly."
December 7, 8, & 9
CANADA, WORLD CONFERENCE ON THE UNIVERSAL
DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
"There is increasing acknowledgement that an
independent judiciary is the key to upholding the rule of law in a free society.
This independence may take a variety of forms across different jurisdictions and
systems of law. But the same principle always applies, namely the protection of
human rights is dependent on the guarantee that judges will be free and will
reasonably be perceived to be free to make impartial decisions based on the
facts and the law in each case, and to exercise their role as protectors of the
constitution, without any pressure or interference from other sources,
especially government. This basic premise is crucial to the maintenance of the
rule of law. At the same time, laws must be public knowledge, clear in meaning,
and must apply to everyone equally, including the government. Unless the
government subordinates itself to the law, and to the sovereignty of the people
through the constitution, that government may rule by law, but its authority
will not be grounded in the rule of law. Rule by law still allows governments to
use their power arbitrarily to deny fundamental rights to citizens, or to cover
up their own corrupt practices. Once citizens lose confidence in the fairness of
the legal and political system, they may turn to other means to assert their
basic rights, and inevitably this results in violence and loss of human life."
The day is coming.
December 16
Joe´s third Formal Complaint was
hand-delivered to the Quality Assurance Manager Ms. Clarke. Ms. Clarke ended the
complaint resolution process that day, but waited until Christmas Eve to fax us
her "Final Report: The Child Protection Division had reviewed the practice
issues relative to the signing of the Voluntary Care Agreement, the validity of
the use of the protocol and the decision to remove Yosef. No stronger internal
review of clinical practice is available."
Shortly before the second Joe' s Christmas
in Canada, Dr. Taylor, who reviewed Mr. Alvarez's report and inspired Joe's
first complaint, for the last time checked that the alarm works well every time
when Joe opened the door.
December 21
BCHRC Chief Commissioner: “Your complaint
has been assigned to Daphne van der Boom, Complaint Analyst for follow
up”.
1999
January 4
Attorney General Dosanjh: "Your concerns
about Andrea Clarke and the social workers should be directed to my colleague,
the Honourable Lois Boone, Minister of Children and Families, or her designate.
In making enquiries on your behalf, my staff have been advised that Minister
Boone or her delegate will be responding to your concerns, if this has not
already occurred. Whenever an individual has reason to believe that someone has
been involved in criminal activity, the proper course of action is for that
individual to report their allegations to the police. It is the responsibility
of the police to conduct investigations. I regret that I am unable to provide
further assistance in this matter. cc: The Honourable Lois Boone."
OPCC Investigator MacDonald: "I am
sympathetic to your family’s distress; however, there is no basis for a
continued complaint against the Vancouver Police Department." BCHRC Delegate of
the Commissioner of Investigation and Mediation, Mr. Finding: "I have decided
not to proceed with an investigation of your complaint. Accordingly, your file
has been closed."
January 5
Children’s Commission, Officer Bell: "We
note that you refer to "criminal activity" in your correspondence to the
Children’s Commission and suggest you contact the local police if you continue
to have concerns about possible criminal activity. You may also wish to contact
the Human Rights Commission with any allegations you may have regarding possible
discriminations toward you and your family."
"Dear Sir/Madam: Your facsimiles of December
29 & 31, 1998 and January 4, 1999 have been brought to my attention. If you
propose to lay information against the parties involved, you may wish to
consider consulting with the police or taking legal advice. The request for a
public inquiry is not one I an assist you with, nor I am able to suggest what
avenue you should follow. I am returning your materials herewith. Yours truly,
C.C. Baird Ellan, Administrative Judge."
January 6
Minister Boone's Office, fax to Ms. Clarke:
"Thank You, Andrea, I appreciate your taking the time this afternoon to with
myself and staff from Child Protection Division regarding the Fisher case. I am
thoroughly impressed with the steps that you and your staff have taken in
attempting to address this family concerns. In fact, I would say that your
actions have been above and beyond what would normally be expected! Your staff,
both in the regional and field offices, have been required to deal with a string
of inflammatory and harsh accusations. Such comments and accusations would weigh
heavily on the confidence in staff to do the work required and only add to the
already high level of stress that social workers face. On behalf of the
Ministers’ office, I would like to express appreciation for a job well done.
Thank you again!"
The Minister to us, by mail: "I would ask
you to work with Andrea Clarke and her staff in the complaint resolution process
that has begun."
January 14
Ms. Clarke, Mr. Milowsky, lawyer Mr. Harris,
our interpreter, us, Family Court, Meeting Room. Invitees: the police, media,
the Ministry Opposition Critic, Child and Youth Advocate. Our interpreter read
the statement: "It is our moral duty to stand for our rights and consequently
for rights of children and other citizens. We do not plan to sue the Ministry.
It is a matter for the crown. We do not care how many years those criminals who
abused our children and family will or will not spend behind bars, we just have
to save other children from similar abuse and discrimination. We do not seek
monetary remedies. Let Ministry just give us the wages they deprived us of with
their lawbreaking conduct so we can go to Costa Rica as soon as possible. There
we will be free, safe and happy like we felt before for us Orwellian year 1998.
A new school year starts there after Easter and we wish to be there a few weeks
sooner, because two of our children need to learn some Spanish. We will give
some meaning to our suffering by helping others. We wish that the ministers
learn from Yosef's Story. We wish that no other child ever has to suffer like
ours did. We wish that after the inquiry all present and future parents of
children in care are always provided with a document stating their rights and
social workers' duties, with a place to write down parents' wishes and social
workers' decisions, with copies of Comprehensive Plans of Care, plans at which
they are allowed to participate, plans made at Family Conferences, Law
CF&CSA being scrupulously obeyed by all social workers."
Justices of Peace during the November,
December and January refused to accept our "Information" about committed crimes.
The last time we tried, on January 26, the Justices of Peace sent us to the
police.
January 26
"So concerned about the mental state of the
accused this witness approached his immediate supervisor and his officer in
charge and advised them of the state of mind of the accused and the volatility
that the accused was presently subject to. It is this witness honest belief that
the accused is presently capable of any violent act at this point made and to
achieve the goals to change the system." (Det/Cst McCluskie's Report to Crown
Counsel).
January 27
With one year long illegal delay, we got
copies of thoroughly censored files of the Ministry about us. In the next couple
of days, we got more prima facie evidence about crimes committed against us also
from copies of the police files.
February 5
Deputy Chief Constable McGuinness, VPD:
"There is no criminal investigation for us to do. Your complaints regarding
specific social workers should be taken up with the Ministry of Children and
Families." Some RCMP Officer refused to touch the documents we presented at the
“E” Division Headquarters receptionists' desk, explaining that the Charter's
rights serve only to criminals. Miss Laycock entered the bus we took the way
back. After noticing us, she started pressing some gadget, and had travelled to
the last bus stop, far from her office.
February 9
"On February 19, 1999 I, Josef Fisher, will
break the peace bond which without any valid reason deprives me of my basic
HUMAN RIGHTS, if the investigation of crimes what Miss LAYCOCK, LEVIN, STOPPER,
SAMIJA, SHEEHAN, PARTRIDGE, LEBEL, TAYLOR, NORTHRUP, CLARKE, BERGGREN-CLIVE and
MILOWSKY committed will not commence."
BRSW Van Den Assem: "Our file 1998-08 On the
merits of the complaint, the Committee considered all the materials provided to
it, and found Ms. Grunberg’s social work practice and conduct to meet the
standards required of a Registered Social Worker. The Practice Review Committee
determined that the appeal should be dismissed pursuant to Rule 9.02(a). You may
appeal the Practice Review Committee’s decision to dismiss this appeal to a
hearing panel pursuant to Rule 9. 02 (a)." (Sic)
Faxed among social workers: "Subject F-case
Another fax just arrived from Mr. Fisher. In bold letters on the bottom of the
page he writes "under unjustly government jail is the only place for a FREE
MAN". Then in bold capitals he writes" Tomorrow starts countdown". Robin is
still attempting to contact the police." And another: "Subject F-case after
speaking to bev and with Monna Huscroft today, the steps to report to the police
that Robin has taken is appropriate. Mona also suggested that we send the faxes
to the police. We need to strategize."
February 10
RCMP Staff Sergeant Chisholm: "this office
is now in receipt of correspondence concerning your request for a public
inquiry, which you forwarded to the RCMP Public Complaint Commission. As this
matter does not appear to involve members of the RCMP it is being forwarded to
the Vancouver City Police for their information."
BCFFPA: "Liza apologized for the Fischers
traumatic experience. While she cannot apologize for the actions of others,
however she can apologize for the fact that families must endure ordeals such as
this. Liza addressed the issue of Josef's fax of February 9, 1999, in which he
mentions that 10 days from that date his peace bond will be broken. Iva said
that ‘for sure he is not going to harm anyone’. She said he sent a fax to the
Ministry saying that there is not harm intended. He will ask them to solve his
complaints."
Report to Crown Counsel, Detective Jette VPD
SOS, PIN 1642, "proposed Charge: S.264 Criminal harassment. Bail Comments: No
contact and no communication directly or indirectly with any staff of offices of
the Ministry of Children and Families except through counsel."
February 11
Faxed among social workers: "Subject:
Blocking Faxes. I just got off the phone with Lisa Carter from BCFFPA. They have
also been receiving these and contacted Ross Dawson. Ross referred her to me.
Bev, I would advise not to block the faxes for now. It could frustrate him. The
police may take steps and we need them to advise of a strategy." Another: "I
received a call from Denise Jette of the Vancouver police. The latest status is
that they went to Crown yesterday at around 4 p.m. Crown wanted the evening for
review. The police are hoping for charges of criminal harassment."
February 12
At 8:30 AM, when taking my daughter to
school, I was arrested for a second time. Warrants signed by one of JPs who
refused let us lay information under the S. 504 of the CC two weeks earlier. One
warrant for the S. 264, another for the S. 810 CC (doctored by Justices of Peace
sometime after June 22, 1999). Faxed among social workers: "one of the social
workers in this office asked me what we can do about safety because he is a
chemist and may make a bomb. I had not heard that Mr. Fisher was a chemist had
you?" "Debbie left me a voice mail last night saying that she he was a chemist.
I am advise Detective Jette." Around that time Detective Jette: "BUT WE KNOW
WHAT CRIMES WE CAN INVESTIGATE AND WHAT CRIMES WE CANNOT!" Such simple and
natural knowledge is the best warrant that many crimes will be never prevented,
investigated and punished. So far nobody condemned, or at least commented this
Canadian custom and practice.
February 18
Children’s Commission to Ms. Clarke: "To
ensure Yosef’s best interest in bringing the complaint to resolution, the
Children’s Commission Complaints Officer, the regional Quality Assurance Advisor
and the Advocate for Child, Youth and Families will consult together to develop
a collaborative approach to this." "Collaborative approach" is really nice
euphemism for the conspiracy (Canadian Criminal
Code, S. 465)
February 25 & 26
Miss Laycock, Mrs. Samija, Sheehan, Lebel,
Northrup, Clarke, Berggren-Clive and gentlemen Partridge, Milowsky delivered
their testimonies to Crown counsels. I was not allowed to see them at
all.
March 4, 23, 24, 25, 29, April 13 &
14
Court proceedings, "Count C45050-02-DD:
Criminal harassment." All the witnesses, including the detective McCluskie and
real JP, who fraudulently let Margaret to carry out her duties, perjured
themselves. Miss Laycock was allegedly once attacked by a bearded man,
unsatisfied with her services to his child. Ministry invented a special cure: to
equip Miss Laycock's rides with personal car, until she can use a public
transport without any traumatic experiences. Though knowing that I was
imprisoned in a maximum security prison, she testified, seeing unknown to her
bearded men in public transit cause her regular attacks of panic. Miss Laycock
expressed her surprise and disappointment that we, experienced foster parents,
opposed all plans she and the Ministry implemented for our child.
March 16
Crown Counsel Ms. Murphy: "Should your
client enter a guilty plea, the Crown would seek a further period of
incarceration of approximately 1 month, and a three year probation period. The
conditions requested by Crown would be as follows: not to send any faxes or
letters to any ministry of Social services worker or office. Please be reminded
that in the event this matter goes to trial, Crown will be entering background
evidence of letters to various members of the Ministry prior to the dates over
which the charge spans."
March 17
Ombudsman Mr. Kushner to Joe: "we are
writing to again confirm that our Office is not investigating your complaints
about the Ministry for Children and Families at this time. Finally, we would
again to confirm that our Office may conduct an investigation of a review by the
Children’s Commission."
March 23
The Leader of the Opposition Mr. Campbell:
"I am sorry to hear of your difficulties with various government ministries. I
have forwarded a copy of your comments to Linda Reid, our Children and Families
Critic, for her attention as well. I know that decision making within that
ministry has been questioned time and again."
March 24
Dr. Janke: "I have worked in the past with
Mr. Monje-Alvarez and I find Mr. Fisher’s comments unusual. It is my opinion
that Mr. Fisher represents an ongoing risk to the staff at the MCF. I suspect,
though, that if Mr. Fisher’s attention can be directed towards other agencies,
in particular the police or Crown Counsel, with respect to his complaints of
criminal activity that his focus would in fact shift towards those agencies,
relieving some pressure from your offices."
March 31
MLA Reid, the Critic of the Ministry for
Children and Families, returned our binder with the F-case documents, keeping
them in her office since December 17, 1998; without a single word.
April 20
Honorable Judge Bendrott repeatedly refused
the bail: "I am not deciding whether or not the actions of the Ministry through
its agents were appropriate or inappropriate. My sole function is to determine
whether or not on the whole of the evidence the prosecution has established
beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the offence with which he
stands charge. I accordingly find the accused guilty as charged."
Though Honorable Bendrott released me on May
7, I was imprisoned until I signed the same conditions for Undertaking S. 810,
on May 10.
FYI: "S. 810 of the C.C.C. does not create
an offence. Its purpose is not to punish crime but to prevent crime from
happening. Its sanctions are not punitive, nor are they intended to redress a
wrong; they are activity and geographic restrictions on a person's liberty
intended to protect a vulnerable group in our society from future
harm."
May 10
Court Appearance "Undertaking S. 810, Count
C36297-02-C: Criminal harassment Recognizance of Bail and Undertaking: I Accused
Joseph FISHER Custody status: 04.746.160 understand that I have been charged
with OFFENCE 01 DATE 27 Aug 98 PLACE Vancouver OFFENCE DESCRIPTION Threatening
SECTION 810 CCC. In order to be released from custody: I undertake not to
contact, directly of indirectly Robin Laycock, Kathy Burggrenclive, Andrea
Clarke, Fred Milowsky, Julia Northrup, Charles Partridge, Heidi Sheechan or
Linda O’Brien. Any other communication with the Ministry of Children and
Families by the accused is to be through counsel and not otherwise. Such
communication is by any means: telephone, telegrams, computer, e-mail, including
television, media, newspaper and radio until this matter is concluded. I also
undertake not to communicate with crown counsel’s office except through
lawyer."
Court Appearances on bail: May 11, June 9,
June 22.
June 23
In my absence: "Stay of Proceedings,
directed by G. Barnes", not signed by the Judge.
July 19
Supreme Court Law, Officer Sainty: "Your
recent letters entitled "Application to a Court of Competent Jurisdiction",
"Open Letter to Attorney General", "Complaint and Report of Crimes to Attorney
General" and "Re: Request not to be persecuted for requests to investigate and
prosecute offences against my child" forwarded to the Supreme Court of British
Columbia have been directed to me for response. No action will be taken in
respect to your correspondence."
July 21
Police Complaint Investigator Mr.
Summersgill: "The information contained in your faxes does not, in our view,
does not constitute a legitimate complaint against Vancouver Police Department.
In accordance with the Police Act we will therefore be closing your file
here."
The Legal Services Society, Mr. Holloway:
"As you know, I have reviewed your case and determined the Legal Services
Society cannot fund your conviction appeal. I will, however, have my decision
reviewed by another lawyer, Debra Carpentier. I will also ask Ms. Carpentier to
consider whether the Legal Services Society can fund your proposed sentence
appeal."
August 11
Children’s Commissioner Mr. Greschner: "I
have had the opportunity to carefully review all the complaints which you have
filed with the Commission commencing in March, 1998. I have determined that the
Commission will now directly and promptly address the complaints. The request
that I send evidence of alleged criminal behaviour to the RCMP is denied. Your
request that I conduct a Special Investigation into this matter is also denied.
This matter is appropriately addressed through the complaint process. The Child,
Youth and Family Advocate will be given notice of this complaint and is invited
to participate on the review.
August 20
Legal Aid, Ms. Carpentier: "There is no
error in Law or principle indicated on the record that would provide you with a
successful ground of appeal. There is no error in sentencing principles
indicated on the record that would provide you with a successful ground of
appeal. The sentence you received was appropriate to the nature of the offence
and to your personal circumstances."
September 20
Office of the Chief of Provincial Judges,
Legal Officer Paluck: “This office is not able to be of assistance to you
respecting the matters raised in your correspondence. Cc: Chief judge R.W.
Metzger.”
September 29
Prominent Canadian law firm Watson Goeppel
Maledy, hired by the BRSW in behalf of Mr. Alvarez: "This is an Appeal and not a
hearing at which you can introduce whatever evidence you wish. In addition, the
Social Workers Act does not include a provision for the subpoena of witnesses.
Accordingly (and with some regret) I advise you that the hearing panel has no
authority to subpoena witnesses who may not wish to testify on either your
behalf or that of the Registered Social Workers. Finally, your written material
suggests that it is important that we "fully obey laws". As you are no doubt
aware some of those laws relate to libel and slander. The allegations you are
making and the labels you are applying to the social workers and others with
whom you have had conflict could well be considered to be either libellous or
slanderous. As counsel for the Board of Registration for Social Workers in the
Province of British Columbia I request that you forthwith delete editorial
references to the RSWs in any future correspondence you address to this office
or we will obtain instructions, from our client, how to respond to you in the
future."
November 11
The Office of the Child, Youth and Family
Advocate to the Children’s Commission, Deputy Mr. Mass: "The Office of the
Child, Youth and Family Advocate will not participate in this review. Further to
this, we are requesting that the panel consider terminating the review under
Section 18(e) of the Children’s Commission Regulations. No apparent benefit or
reasonable prospect of benefit to the child will be obtained by proceeding with
the review."
Investigator OPCC, Mr. Summersgill: "The
information that you have provided our office does not, in our opinion,
constitute a legitimate complaint against the VPD in accordance with the police
Act. I would take steps to have your access to our e-mail system blocked. The
police Complaint commissioner will not receive any further material from you. I
am advising you that my offer for one fax letter is now withdrawn and your
complaint file will remain closed.“
November 20
We got copy of the Director of the Child
Protection Mr. Dawson’s letter to the Children’s Commission: "From our
perspective, Mr. Fisher’s focus on this case is seriously and dangerously
obsessive. At the root of this alleged conspiracy are social workers Robin
Laycock and Enrique Monje-Alvarez, whom he repeatedly refers to in the most
defamatory and inflammatory language, e.g.: "single, childless, evil, sick mind
in sick body and mind...", referring to Ms. Laycock, "sicko, racist and
sadist...", referring to Mr. Alvarez, "single, childless young woman suffering
with inferiority complex due to her deformed body and expressing her depressed
sexual needs by victimizing children..." referring to Ms. Laycock. Despite his
convictions for criminal harassment Mr. Fisher continues to deny any
responsibility for his actions in harassing Ministry staff. Creating a "cause
celebre" where the corruption of a vast array of government officials will be
exposed appears to be Mr. Fisher’s "raison d’etre."
November 22
We received letter from the Director of
Child Protection Dawson’s to Children’s Commission Panel: ”Given the concerns we
have around Mr. Fisher’s harassment of MCF staff, we wish to avoid potential
tampering with and/or the intimidation of witnesses by Mr. Fisher. We are
reluctant to identify our witnesses to him at this stage, particularly when it
may not even be necessary should the Commission ultimately decide against oral
hearing. It is the Director’s request that the family service (FS) File and the
child in care (CIC) file not to be shared with Mr. and Mrs. Fisher. This request
is based on the health and safety concerns Mr. Fisher may pose to the third
parties identified in these files."
Government officials are determined to
sacrifice human lives, rather than obey the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, in our case impotent to protect the rights and freedoms of a
12-years-old child. The F-case was full two-years-old, when I elicited the first
proof of it:
2000
January 5
The wife of the F-case second MLA and the
Assistant of the first MLA Ms. Jones refused to book an appointment for me with
her boss. I said: ”If nobody will investigate child abuse and discrimination, as
ultimate statement and action to stop child abuse and discrimination, I will be
forced to burn alive myself, maybe in your office." Ms. Jones: ”It is your
choice.”
January 13
Director of Child Protection Mr. Dawson to
Children’s Commission: ”we maintain our position that the child, Yoseph Fisher,
will not derive any benefit from the Tribunal Chair pursuing this complaint. In
our submission of November 19, 1999, we concur with the Child, Youth and Family
Advocate’s position that this matter is driven by the father’s agenda and that
there is no apparent benefit or reasonable prospect of benefit to the child
obtained by proceeding with this review. Of further concern is a recent threat
"Full, independent and impartial investigation of Crimes by uncorrupted agency
with jurisdiction to investigate crimes will start in 30 days. If not, after
this deadline I will act necessarily in protest against illegal treatment, abuse
and discrimination of innocent children and families by social workers,
policemen, crown officials, by whole Government, with only purpose to save other
innocent children from similar and worse abuse and discrimination." A copy of
this correspondence and Mr. Fisher’s letter of October 7, 1999 in which he
states "or some terrorist act of mine" will be forwarded to the attention of the
Vancouver City police. The Ministry views the uttering of threats by Mr. Fisher
with grave concern."
January 25
I hand-delivered eight copies of the latest
request for help to the VPD Headquarters, one for every member of the Police
Board. for the next few months, the police maintained very tight security, even
changing locations of their meetings.
January 26
The VPD Investigation Report 00-20747:
"Sexual Offence Squad Det/Cst Jette # 1642 Offence: Section 24 Mental Health
Act. On 00 January 26 Det/cst Jette contacted Dee Beveridge, Probation Officer
for Josef Fisher. Fisher's Probation Order dated June 22 had not included a
Supervision Order. Fisher had the Probation Order amended on Dec 17, 1999 to
include a Supervision Order. Fisher told her that he was going to commit a crime
unless he met with a police officer. He wanted to speak with a police officer
and wanted the officer to record and document that MCF had taken his child away.
Fisher told her he planned to do something around February 12 if he didn't meet
with police officers. He did not tell her what he intended to do, only that no
one would get hurt. She stated that Fisher planned to let her know in advance if
he was going to commit a crime so that she could alert someone to stop him. she
told Det/Cst Jette that she had arranged for a police officer to meet with
Fisher in the near future. Det/Cst Jette told her to cancel that appointment and
to notify her if Fisher wished to deal with any police officers. Det/Cst Jette
consulted with Sgt. Hovbrender and Sgt. Cunningham about the letters. The
decision was made to speak with Mr. Fisher about these letters to determine
Fisher's intentions and motives.
Listen to the Audio record (go to the right
corner of my blog): "THESE CRIMES ARE NOT GOING TO BE
INVESTIGATED!" I was arrested for the fourth time at the end of that
interrogation, without any warrant, firstly under the Mental Health Act. Without
any Court Order, the State detained me among seriously mentally ill people,
without any treatment (except being involuntarily drugged three times), because
the police instructed mental health professionals to do so.
February 2
Head of the Intensive Psychiatric Care Unit
Dr. Severy: "From the standpoint of risk, I believe that this man is quite
capable of carrying out disastrous act in the community if, in his perception,
the complaints that he and his wife have logged over the last two years are not
dealt with."
February 8
The Children’s Commission Panel and two
lawyers for the Ministry met with mother to impose coercive, irrational, biased
and only for the ministry strongly advantageous conditions: unrealistically
short timing for the thirteen respondents' testimony - the plan on the first of
three days to grill our child and parents after him. Ministry lawyers requested
that the first two requests for help, from January 12, and from February 19,
1998 are excluded. They objected “to the admission of Dr. Farmer’s report of May
5, 1998 on the basis that he does not have sufficient personal knowledge to
provide a basis for his opinion." They insisted at the child’s presence through
the whole process. The Panel chose for the first day of the hearing our child's
15th Birthday.
February 24
Dr. Severy refused to give me a list of all
my statements what differ from the reality and facts and prove that I am
paranoid and delusional person, dangerous to myself and others. Dr. Koritar,
VGH: "MOST RESPONSIBLE DIAGNOSES: PD with paranoid and antisocial traits. Other
diagnosis present legal problems. IMPRESSION: PD with narcissistic obsessive
compulsive paranoid and antisocial traits."
My efforts to expose the corruption of a
vast array of government officials were diagnosed: "delusions of persecution
with narcissistic, obsessive, compulsive and antisocial traits, delusion of
grandeur, altered thought process, decreased insight, potential for violence,
aggression, self-harm, rigid thinking, attention seeking, possible substance
abuse." Plus disorders: "Paranoid Personality with Delusional Disorder,
Antisocial Personality Disorder, and Borderline Personality Disorder."
Government Officials responsible for ruining my child and family’s lives
manifest unmitigated psychopathic traits: total disregard for and violation of
the rights of others, deceitfulness, repeated lying, reckless disregard for
safety of others, cruelty, failure to accept personal responsibility for own
acts, lack of concern for the suffering of others, lack of guilt, empathy,
remorse.
February 25
Children’s Commission: "the Ministry made an
application that the Child Service and Family Service file not be disclosed for
health and safety reasons. The panel has considered this application and has
decided to sever from the Child Service and Family Service file information
which may identify personal information pertaining third parties. No such
application was made with regard to the Resource file. Due to its nature, the
panel also severed the Resource file in this manner."
March 7
At the Eve of Joe's 15th Birthday and
Children's Commission's Hearing, my wife received via courier the "SUMMONS: YOU
ARE REQUIRED TO ATTEND as a witness at the place, date and time mentioned below,
and to bring with you and produce all audio tapes and tape recording touching in
any way on the complaint about the child. In particular, you are required to
bring all such audio tapes and tape recording pertaining to conversations with
social workers in this matter."
March 15
FOIPP Commissioner: ”Your case has been
opened as of March 15, 2000 and has been assigned to Bill Trott, who will be the
Portfolio Officer handling the review. Section 56 of the FIPPA provides 90 days
to resolve this request for review. The 90-days period in your case will expire
on June 13, 2000. The first 68 days of the review period will, with your
cooperation involve mediation and/or negotiation with Bill Trott." Mr. Trott's
response is pending.
March 29
The VPD Information and privacy Coordinator
Clarke: “In your letter you requested the same information that you already
requested from us. This file is now under review with the Office of the
Information and Privacy Commissioner, therefore we will not be responding to
your request until the review is completed. cc Bill Trott, Portfolio Officer
OIPC.”
April 7 – 12
Telus disconnected our phone.
May 8
Riverview Hospital, Officer Ms. MacDonald:
“I am writing in response to your request for a copy of your Psyhiatrist and
Psychologist assessments. However, I have severed information according to the
guidelines provided in the FOIPA. “disclosure would be an unreasonable invasion
of a third party’s personal privacy”. You may ask the Information and Privacy
Commissioner to review our decision.”
May 10
Children’s Commission, Mr. Harris QC: "The
objection that the complaints should be characterized as criminal in nature can
only be adjudicated in other forums and is irrelevant to the complaints before
this Panel. The Panel expressly makes no finding about whether there is any
apparent benefit or reasonable prospect of benefit to the child to be obtained
by proceeding with the review. Similarly, this decision should not be taken as
making any finding or comment upon the merits of the complaints
referred."
May 18
Ombudsman Officer Carlson: “We requested
copies of correspondence that you received from the Children’s Commission prior
to commencing an investigation. We have not received any documentation as
requested. We requested that you forward copies of any evidence that you have to
support the allegations that you have been treated poorly by the Board of
Registration for Social Workers. We have not received any documentation as
requested”. Flashback to March 16, Officer Carlson: “On March 9, 2000 you
brought into the Ombudsman office a binder containing original documents. You
requested that we make copies and return these documents. The documents had been
forwarded to our Victoria office. We have not made copies. We declined to
investigate as the Children’s Commission had undertaken to hear the merits of
the complaint. Our file was closed.”
May 25
VPD Inspector Eldridge: "Recently, you have
been advised by Telus Corporation, acting on behalf of the Vancouver Police
Board, to desist from using your Fax to send large volumes of same issue
correspondence. First, that you are wasting your personal resources and the time
of the agencies references by sending such material and, second, that if in fact
you have relevant issues, then the same should be directed to the Ministry Of
Child and Family Services."
June 16
The National Security Investigation Const.
Powell and Const. Davidson, VPD Const. Jette and Const. Cunningham, with
Criminal Profiler and Associate Professor of Clinical and Forensic Psychology
Dr. Hart: "to have him sign a contract acknowledging that if he violates it, he
will be charged with Criminal harassment. It is clear that FISHER is not going
to go away. It is possible that stress and pressure can cause a person to become
mentally ill. There is a HIGH RISK that FISHER will carry out
an act of violence against any person who, at that point in time, he feels is
significantly interfering with his life. There is also a HIGH
RISK that, if he attempts suicide, he will try to take someone with
him. FISHER obviously feels justified in his course of action and he has the
ability to carry out his threats. The act of writing and sending faxes is an
outlet for FISHER for the moment. As long as he sees alternatives to violence,
he will utilize them. The risk would increase dramatically if the contact
stops."
September 14
Minister for Youth Honorable Bowbrick
vehemently prohibited us to fax him anything. He hung up with a promise: if we
fax anything to him again, our phone would be disconnected. In spite of not
faxing a single dot to the Minister, our phone was two hours later permanently
disconnected. Premier Dosanjh three weeks later promoted Bowbrick to third AG
responsible for our case.
December 16
Our Honorable M.L.A. MacPhail met mother and
child, and from his own hands accepted the child’s Open Letter to her - set of
his complaints from the years 2000, 1999 and Formal Complaint No.3, unsolved for
exactly two years before. Honorable MacPhail expressed a great astonishment that
nothing was done yet, promised to read it and let both mother and child know her
conclusions.
2001
January 11
Our Honorable M.L.A. and Deputy Premier: "I
do not have the authority to order an independent inquiry into your complaints.
There are several independent officers of the legislature that have the power to
investigate complaints against the provincial government or the police. They
are: The Child, Youth and Family Advocate, the Police Complaint Commissioner,
the Ombudsman. As you have the right to request an investigation from these
offices, I do not believe that independent inquiry is necessary."
January 15
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Lapper: "I
regret that the Attorney General is unable to meet with you about this
matter."
January 18
Det/Cst McCluskie arrested me again, again
Without a Warrant. He again transported me in handcuffs in an unmarked car, with
another guy present. Before throwing me into jail once again, he silently stood
for a few seconds with his back toward me, in his shirt, though the temperature
was below zero and he had a jacket in the car until he get out. I was looking
directly at his exposed gun. Charges: Criminal harassment, Breach of probation,
Uttering threats.
Report to Crown Counsel 01-012424: "In
January of 1998 a complaint was laid by the Ministry of Children and Families
after the accused’s daughter disclosed to a social worker that she had been
digitally penetrated by her 12 year-old brother on a number of occasions over a
six month period. Acting under the guidelines of the Child Protection Act, the
Ministry removed the accused’s son from the home in order to deal with the
protection issue of the victim. At the time of this incident the accused and his
wife ran a daycare out of the basement of their home and utilized this service
as their sole source of income Due to the nature of the allegation, the ministry
also notified the parents of the children attending the daycare that there had
been an allegation of sexual assault by one of the family members of the daycare
proprietor. This in effect caused the parents of the children attending the
daycare to withdraw their children from the accused’s daycare facility. As a
result the accused had his son removed from the family home and the accused and
his wife lost their source of income. Over the next few months, the accused’s
son received therapy and counseling for the sexual deviancy and eventually was
returned to the family home. Starting with the apprehension of his child the
accused commenced a campaign to seek justice for all the injustices that he felt
he and his family had been subjected to. The accused commenced a letter and fax
campaign to numerous officials within the ministry and the Provincial
Government. The accused sent hundreds and hundreds of letters and faxes to
everyone he felt played a part in the "abduction" of his son". This campaign
went non stop. In order to effectively give the accused and opportunity to air
his feelings a number of meetings were set up with officials from the Ministry
and the police to try and resolve some of his issues. Despite the fact that
these meetings were held the accused was never satisfied with the outcomes. The
accused then pursued every avenue of appeal made available to him. Unfortunately
the accused was again never satisfied with the outcome or the decisions of any
officials. In fact in some circumstances the accused walked out of the room half
way through the process. The accused continued his campaign of writing letters
and faxes to Cabinet Ministers, Ministry officials, the police, news mediums and
the list goes on. The campaign to seek justice in the accused’ words became very
personal and the accused made very specific threats to a number of individuals
within the Ministry. As the time progressed the threats and the frequency of
letters and faxes aimed at Ministry workers increased to a point where several
of the workers feared for their own safety. In one instance the accused boarded
a BC Transit bus directly behind a ministry worker identified as Robin Laycock
and struck her with a bag of groceries. As a direct result of his actions as
well as the content, frequency and volume of documents being sent to the
ministry, the accused was arrested and charged with Criminal Harassment. By the
time the accused was arrested several hundred documents had been forwarded to
the Ministry, individual workers, government officials and the police. The
accused went sent for a 30-day psychiatric assessment and was eventually
convicted under Section 264 of the Criminal Code for Criminal Harassment. Since
this order Mr. Milowsky alone has received an average of eight e-mails a day and
again has received in the hundreds of documents, many of which number near 100
pages. It should be noted that as a result of the letter campaign and the
aggressive nature by which the accused is conducting himself, a number of
provincial social workers have had to transfer out of the lower mainland in fear
of their own safety. The Ministry has employed security guards at a number of
their offices solely for the purpose of protection from the accused. These
preventive measures have cost the Ministry for Children and Families several
thousands of dollars. It should be noted that a number of Psychiatric
assessments have been conducted on the accused and his behaviour. Court ordered
assessments were done at Riverview hospital and the RCMP threat assessment Unit.
All of these assessments were similar in nature in that they determined the
accused to be unpredictable, volatile and dangerous, not only to himself, but to
others as well. A quote from the RCMP threat assessment is as follows: It is the
consensus of the group that there is a HIGH RISK that Fisher will carry out an
act of violence against any person who, at that point in time, he feels is
significantly interfering with his life. There is also a HIGH RISK that, if he
attempts suicide, he will try to take someone with him."
March 1
VPD Insp. Eldridge: "It is clear that the
psychiatrists who examined you at hospital following your arrest agreed with the
non-medical assessment of the respondents who arrested you. Such agreement is
reflected in the fact you were subsequently accommodated at a mental health
facility for thirty days. Many social and government agencies have been made
privy to your grievance through tens of thousands pages mailed, faxed and
otherwise delivered documents citing your grievance. Unfortunately, following
your release from the referenced institution - and in spite of many previous
requests and warnings to cease sending your documents - you renewed such
activity with increased vigour and vituperation. You have been warned by police
on 2001-February-23 to desist from continuing to re-offend, or you will be
liable to a third arrest."
March 9
The Premier’s assistant denied that one of
our complaints was hand-delivered into his office on March 3. Police Complaint
Commissioner’s Investigator, former Human Rights Investigator Bachman: "WHEREAS
the Discipline Authority has summarily dismissed the public trust complaint of
Josef Fisher (Complainant) by notice dated March 1, 2001 because further
investigation would not produce evidence of a public trust default. AND WHEREAS
the Police Complaint Commissioner has examined all relevant documents and
records received from the Complainant and the Discipline Authority. THE
COMMISSIONER HEREBY CONFIRMS the discipline Authority’s decision pursuant to
Section 54(6) of the Police Act. You wished to lodge a complaint in person with
this office and requested an interpreter, and requested information regarding
mediation and other support services available to you. The police Complaint
Commissioner has reviewed your request, as well as your other lodged complaints
with this office, and has determined that you are capable of lodging a complaint
without the assistance of an interpreter and this office."
April 12
Ombudsman Kushner: "We are not reviewing the
decision of the Ministry for Children and Families when it concluded that it
must remove children from your home and that it would no longer consider you an
approved ministry foster home. That was reviewed by the Ministry and you were
provided with the outcome of the review."October 30
Prosecutor Ms. Adams to my lawyer: "I met
with Manjit Bains and Fred Milowsky (note: witnesses for the prosecution)
yesterday. It appears that mediation is not possible because of several
unnegotiable demands of your client which are out of the control of the
Ministry. As I understand efforts were made by the ministry to mediate a
solution to the dilemma but they are not being actively pursued at this
time."
August 13
MH Advocate of BC: "Although we hope you
will find a positive resolution to your unresolved complaints, unfortunately we
are unable to assist you in this matter."
September 17
BC Civil Liberties Association: "Please,
please, please remove us from your mailing list! As previously stated, we cannot
intervene in your case. We are a small, non-profit organization, and we use a
modem to connect to the Internet and our email. Your posts take a great deal of
time to download, particularly when you send many of them in a single day.
Please stop sending us your appeals. Thank you for your consideration. Ingrid
Witvoet Office Manager."
September 24
Honorable Attorney General Plant: Dear Josef
and Iva Fisher: "Thank you for your letter of September 16, 2001. As the issues
you raise fall under the purview of the Minister of Children and Family
Development, I have taken the liberty of forwarding your correspondence to the
Honourable Gordon Hogg."
November 16
"You have asked for an apology to your son
for "all illegal and cruelest treatment." The Ministry does not agree that its
actions were illegal or cruel." Signed: Deputy of the Director for Child
Protection Matheson, Regional Operating Executive Milowsky
December 1
Joe handed a copy of his complaints to his
Honorable representative MP Davies. She: "Are you now living with your family?"
He: "Yes." She: "So, what are you complaining about?"
December 18
BC Human Rights Commission: "We will not
respond to any further submissions regarding this issue."
2002
April 16
Reasoning for Sentence, Honorable Judge
Weitzel: "social workers were doing the best they could do." To correct my
behavior, Honorable Judge sent me to prison for three months.
September 27
Chief Judge of the BC Provincial Courts
Baird Ellan, known for her compassion and support for the underdog: "I
acknowledge receipt of your e mails of September 4, 2002. I am unable to assist
you with your concerns."
December 4
I was arrested for the 9th time, this time
with a warrant. Because I "between the 19th day of August, 2002 and the 25th day
of November, 2002, while bound by a probation order made by The Honorable judge
Weitzel, on the 17th day of April, 2002, did without reasonable excuse fail to
comply with such order by contacting members of the Ministry for Children and
Families, contrary to section 733.1 of the criminal Code of
Canada."
To ensure my attendance in court
proceedings, participating judges denied me a bail. One of them (probably the
same guy who, on March 4, 1999, excused himself from trying the case, reasoning
that he had received and had read some of our requests for help and remembers
our wish to leave Canada), refused to accept my Statement. My lawyer La Liberte
QC was absent. Since then, the rest of court proceedings proceeded in my
absence.
I inquired from my mates in Maximum Security
Prisons about the quality of foster care the majority of Canadian born prisoners
lived through. They knew we met courtesy of social workers and police who stole
my child. One horror story after another. To make it worse, a majority of them
were accepted nicely once or twice, being soon kicked out from that safe place
and kind people by his social worker. They developed a natural sense of justice,
absent in public servants' minds and acts. Not your JUSTUS, but balanced, quid
pro quo justice, giving the society back what they got. Nothing can balance the
child's life, ruined by social workers paid for his care.
Most children in our care were of native
origin. Six of them were abused or neglected so seriously that the most
disruptive method was in their best interest. Thirteen other children were
senselessly abused and traumatized by the apprehension. We regularly met and
closely observed our foster children's parents. Much cheaper, safe and efficient
methods were never considered.
The chances that ordinary Canadian children
and families can successfully defend their rights, health and lives against
similar cruelty and malice is absolute zero, considering our excellent work for
the Ministry for Children and Families. Native origin, the wrong accent, wrong
color and other "disabilities" are aggravating factors.
2003
January 2
BC Human Rights Tribunal, officer Morgan:
"Recently, the government has passed legislation that will have the effect of
eliminating the Commission and all human rights complaints will be made directly
to the Tribunal. However, that legislation is not yet in effect. Therefore, if
you think that your situation raises human rights concerns under the Code, you
should contact the Commission."
February 19
After a few Star Chamber hearings, The Court
of Justice released me from a Maximum security prison without any explanation.
Crown counsels and QC La Liberte refused to disclose reasons for such
secrecy.
February 20
Another secret Court hearing in my
absence.
February 24
Regional Director of Child Protection Ms.
O’Brien assured us that the Minister for children and Families knows the facts
about our case.
March 6
Ms. O’Brien e-mailed that Hogg was
unreachable to sign the apology to Joe.
March 7
Ms. O’Brien to Joe: "I am confident that the
Ministry of Children and Family Development has learned from these events. As a
Director I assure you that our practice will improve."
April 24
Director, Information and Privacy Analyst
Tully: "The Ministry of Attorney General received your request on April 16, 2003
for the following "Disclosure and correction of all false data."
April 28
Lawyer appointed by the MCF for us to Mr.
Hamilton to MCF Minister Hogg: "The Fisher’s allegations include criminal
conduct, highly unprofessional conduct, and allegations of violations of their
rights and the rights of their son, Joseph. The Fishers wish an acknowledgment
that their complaints are being considered by you with a view to resolving those
complaints. The Fishers also seek an apology from the Minister for Children and
Family Development for the injustices they have suffered. I kindly ask that you
respond to me with a letter indicating the status of these matters with your
office."
An unsigned and unregistered "CAUTION",
dated March 8, 2003, like a present to Joe's sixth Birthday in Canada, was
supposedly placed at the top of the ministry files: "This file contains
information about Mr. and Mrs. Fisher, and members of their family that is
incorrect and prejudicial to them." The Caution, the not-committal apology and
proposed help so we can leave Canada (less than the price of the wedding gift
Honorable MP Robinson stole for his homosexual lover the following Spring),
cannot buy our conscience.
May1
The Office of the Solicitor General of
Canada: "you have already contacted the Ministry for Children and Family
Development and the Attorney General of British Columbia. As this is a
provincial matter; I can only suggest that you continue to pursue this issue
with them."
June 13
Lawful deputy of all five F-case Attorney
Generals Gillen, QC: "I have again deleted you (sic)message without reading it
and will continue to do so. Robert.Gillen@gov.bc.ca: Subject: If you cannot
learn from evil deeds, you are doomed to repeat them Sent: Sat, 23 Aug 2008
16:17:44 -0700 was read on Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:24:39 -0700"
June 16
Office of the Prime Minister Executive
Correspondence Officer A. Annable: "On behalf of the Right Honourable Jean
Chrétien, I would like to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence of April
25. While you may be assured that careful consideration has been given to the
situation you have described; the matter you have raised does not fall within
the jurisdiction of the federal government. you would be best adviced;
therefore; to pursue your enquiries with the provincial authority."
July 23
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
Canada Cauchon: "As my predecessor, the Honourable Anne McLellan, indicated to
you in her correspondence of October 9, 1998, as Minister of Justice I am not in
a position to offer legal advice to the public. In addition, if you have not
done so already, you may wish to write to the Honourable Gordon Hogg, Minister
of Children and Family Development of British Columbia, who may be in position
to help you."
August 29
IPP - Privacy, Information & Records
Management Division Tully: "I am able to confirm that, pursuant to section 29(2)
of the Act, your files with Criminal Justice Branch have been annotated with
your correspondence. The Ministry of Children and Families also annotated their
files with your correspondence. Other than to disclose this information to the
Ministry of Children and Families for a consistent purpose, section 33 of the
Act prohibits any further disclosure of this information. Since there is nothing
I can do for you at this time, please remove my name from your distribution list
as I will be no longer responding to these general e-mails, and note that we
closed our file."
2004
February 19
Enquiry BC: "To make a complaint about the
possible illegal actions of a provincial government Ministry, you may wish to
contact the Office of the Ombudsman of the Legislative Assembly. We suggest that
you may also wish to contact the Honourable Christy Clark, Minister of Children
and Family Development. You may also wish to contact the Office for Children and
Youth of the Ministry of the Attorney General (formerly the Child and Youth
Family Advocate). In order to direct e-mail to the Prime Minister of Canada and
other Federal Government offices, the Federal Government has a toll free
information service that should be able to direct you. To find non-profit
advocacy groups that may be able to assist you, Information Services Vancouver,
a non-government organization, provides local listings for community resources
and services".
March 3
Honorable Member of LA Nijjar: "In the
ministry of Children and Family Development what we are doing is groundbreaking,
but it's not spoken about in this province. It's spoken about all over North
America and all over Europe."
March 19
AG Administrative Assistant Court Services
Branch: "Hi, Please remove my name from your distribution list. Thanks, C.
Blakeman".
March 26
AG ministry Executive Director Court
Services Branch Sorensen: "Mr. Fisher, When I get your notes, I delete them. I
have no ability to assist you. Could you please remove me from your distribution
list. Thank you."
May 7
Deputy Child and Youth Officer Mass: "Mr.
Fisher, As requested I shared your material and spoke with Jane Morley about
your situation. As I discussed with you, the Child and Youth Officer for British
Columbia has a new and considerably different mandate than either the former
Child, Youth and Family Advocate or the Children's Commission. The Officer does
not deal with individual situations such as yours and does not have the power to
decide to conduct an investigation. Your visit to our office caused considerable
concern for our staff. We are aware of your ongoing difficulties with MCFD and
safety concerns that people have about you. I am requesting that you do not come
to our office again."
May 17
Robinson, Office of the Conflict of Interest
Commissioner: "Please remove this address from your mailing list
immediately."
May 19
Spokesperson of the Honorable Canadian
Senator For Children Rights Pearson: "Please remove us from your
list."
May 21
Ombudsman Kushner: "The Ombudsman Office is
not investigating your complaints about the Ministry of Children and Family
development. Our file remain closed and I decline your request to
meet."
May 31
Police Complaint Commissioner Ryneveld QC:
"I do not see on a cursory review of the documentation that you have supplied
that our office has any jurisdiction to deal with your complaints and concerns.
You should be aware that the Ombudsman's Office has jurisdiction to deal with
complaints of this nature This office will take no further action."
June 3
AG Legal Services Branch Legislative Program
Coordinator Hallman: "PLEASE DO NOT EMAIL ME ANYMORE ON THIS"
June 14
Ms. Mercer, Court Services Branch: "Please
remove me from your list. I don't know why I was chosen to be included in your
list, but it is truly an annoyance to me to have the constant barrage of e-mails
from you. This has been going on far too long and I am tired of it. While I
understand you have a right to make your plight known, I am not interested in
receiving any further information regarding this from you. If you have any
consideration, please do not send me any more e-mails. Thank you."
July 6
North East Community Mental Health Team,
ours truly R. M. Ewasiuk: "On June 29, 2004, you came to our office and spoke to
myself regarding obtaining assistance with a long standing issue with the MCFD.
Unfortunately, the team was unable to suggest any other agency or person that
would be helpful that you have not already contacted in the past 6,5 years.We
are unable to help in your search to redress your complaints against
MCFD."
September 24
Canadian Children's Rights Council Grant
Wilson President: "Hi , Please take us off your email list."
December 1
Public Safety and Solicitor General
Assistant Deputy Minister Phipps: "Dear Josef and Iva Fisher: For a number of
months I have been receiving your emails. It is not clear to me why I was added
to your email list. I have reviewed the materials in your respective emails. I
had no involvement whatsoever in the proceedings detailed in your submissions
and I do not work for an agency whose primary function is to investigate
complaints. I would ask that you please remove me from your mailing list as I do
not feel that continuing to send me the emails will do anything to resolve your
concerns. Thank you. BERT PHIPPS". Public Safety and Solicitor General Assistant
Deputy Minister Sturko: "Please take me off your distribution
list."
December 7
Assistant to the Leader Salpie Stepanian:
"As Social Services is the responsibility of your provincial government, I would
encourage you to contact your local MLA, Joy MacPhail with your concerns. For
your information, you may contact Ms. MacPhail by writing to 2365 East Hastings
Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5L 1V6 or by calling (604)
775-2277."
December 9
Public Affairs Bureau MacGregor: "PLEASE
STOP SENDING THESE!"
December 30
Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor
General Assistant Deputy Minister Executive Assistant Maniec: "I have been
receiving copies of yours messages for some time now. Unfortunately, I am not
able to assist you. Please remove me from your distribution list. Thank you.
Shirley."
November 28
VPD Board Chair and Media Contact Person
Campbell: "Quit bothering me." All such wishes are granted. When promoted, like
this Honorable Senator, they have to ask again. Sincere responses, i.e. "Quit
sending me your fucking stupid messages.....I could not care less so go away and
fuck off!", are of course preferred to contemptuous silence. Though "really,
Larry Campbell, Gordon Campbell, Glen Campbell, who gives a shit?", as former
Honorable Appellate judge and the sixth F-case Honorable Attorney General at the
occasion of a Literacy week quipped.
2005
January 1
Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor
General Assistant Deputy Minister, Director, Special Projects Young: "Could you
please remove me from your mailing list. My work functions do not relate to the
matters in these e-mails. Tx."
January 18
MCFD Information Services Branch A/ Manager
& Records Officer DiGeorgio: "PLEASE REMOVE MY EMAIL ADDRESS FROM YOUR
DISTRIBUTION LIST. I HAVE ASKED SEVERAL TIMES. Thank you Jo-Anne
DiGeorgio."
February 7
The Senate of Canada, Hearings on Human
Rights: "a truthful complete review of the rights of Canadian children would be
embarrassing to the government of Canada."
March 14
Another attempt to attract the Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation's interest and expose the corruption of a vast array of
government officials. My previous attempts to speak with someone from the CBC
ended with the receptionists’ instructions to leave my documents there, with the
same promise - that someone would soon contact me. That day, at 1:30 pm, I
e-mailed the latest request for help to 294 addressees. This request for help is
the first article of my blog. At 2:10 PM I hand-delivered the same request for
help to the CBC receptionist. I was completely ignored for one hour. Then some
man gave me back my request for help. He explained that nobody will accept my
request for help, because of a threat: "THIS IS AN
EMERGENCY!!! If ignored, I will sacrifice my life - set myself on fire to
achieve some Justice." The warning was used so the public would finally
know what kind of people their servants are.
Followed my emergency response: I sat in
front of the CBC, holding an open bottle and two lighters. Nobody tried to
communicate with me in any way. I ended this embarrassing theatre after about
twenty minutes. I closed the bottle and went back to the empty, but unlocked CBC
building. Nothing happened. I walked back, towards the ERT. I ignored the ERT’s
orders to kneel in front of them – I would rather die standing, than to kneel in
front of a Pig. ERT discovered a binder in my backpack, labelled with big
letters: SHORT AND INCOMPLETE REPORT. PUBLIC OFFICERS' CRIMES AGAINST OUR FAMILY
31/12/97 –TODAY. All this was witnessed by CBC employees, their visitors and
bystanders. Some recorded the ERT response with their cameras.
FYI: Whether we're looking at scams,
scandals, or stories that other media simply haven't touched, our crew of
experienced journalists pursue stories with vigour and determination. Our
stories come from everywhere, from tips by concerned citizens, from whistle
blowers, from our own contacts. No matter where our information originates, we
treat our sources with confidentiality and discretion. You can rely on CBC to
live up to its journalistic reputation as fair thorough and accurate. We are the
home of public service journalism and we take pride in that
mandate.
Canadians have the right to know the truth.
The media responded with the first F-case public comment:
"Attention-Seeker" Arrested After CBC
Incident
Mar, 14 2005 - 4:00 PM VANCOUVER Vancouver
Police had to send the Emergency Response Team Monday afternoon, after a man
threatened to light himself on fire at the CBC Plaza in downtown Vancouver. Just
after 3 PM, the man entered the foyer of the building on Hamilton Street
carrying a one-litre bottle of some flammable liquid, paper and a number of
cigarette lighters. Insp. Bob Rolls says the ERT managed to take the man down
before he hurt himself or others. Rolls says he suspects the man just wanted
some attention. "I think he's going through something to do with a family
break-up situation, and he was despondent about that.' Rolls says this man has
been struggling with mental health issues, and they have dealt with him
before.
It was the same in my then communist
homeland. The same disdain for the truth, the same disrespect for human rights
and lives. When the police regime collapsed, most criminals were fully or
partially amnestied. Exempted were only the most despicable types - abusers of
power and child abusers.
A psychiatrist in charge at St. Paul
Hospital diagnosed me "paranoid & delusional" and kept me there for almost
24 hours. The next psychiatrist, Dr. Kerr hastily released me, without any
paperwork, maybe because he knows me since my first evening in State Custody. In
the meantime, another gang of Peace Officers lied to my wife that I told them my
plans to kill her and all our children, and some social worker offered my family
a safe house. My wife declined such generosity.
April 4
Honorable Minister Hagen: "Please remove me
from your distribution list. Thank you."
April 18
Honorable Minister Hagen: "I have asked
before and will kindly ask again. Please CEASE e-mailing this account. Both
Josef AND Iva Fisher. If you would like to send in correspondence, please do so.
Thank you." We informed the Minister that any communication in writing IS the
correspondence.
May 22
Honorable Minister Hagen: "This is my THIRD
request. Please remove me from your mailing list. Should you not, I will have no
other option other than to report you to your IP provider." Civil Liberties
Association on September 27, 1999: "I will contact the mail administrator at
your internet service provider and ask that they reprimand you."
August 8
Our attempts to access the justice through
the Access Justice’s only response, from Mossop QC: "The Community Legal
Assistance Society has limited legal resources. We cannot take all the cases
that are presented to us. I have reviewed your email and the regress (sic) you
are seeking. Your legal problem would take a great deal of legal resources. At
this time, we are unable to provide you with a lawyer."
November 17
The Night of the Police Awards in Victoria,
and the 15th Anniversary of our wedding: a gang of Peace Officers and one
Officer of the Ministry forced their entry into our home without any warrant.
They were hunting a suicide-bomber, who had reportedly uttered threats in the AG
Oppal’s Constituency Office. Courtesy of the police, it is known that Honorable
Minister Hagen consulted this little incident with Honorable AG
Oppal.
December 31
Registered OPEN LETTER TO: New Child and
Youth Officer for BC Ms. Turpel-Lafond FROM: Falsely accused former foster
parents Josef and Iva Fisher DATE: 31/12/2006 – Ninth F-case Anniversary RE:
Catastrophic Incompetence, Corruption and Malice in Progress Dear Madam, we are
former foster parents with an excellent record of parenting and foster
parenting, compelled to learn by experience how the rights of children are
intentionally abused. In return, we educate government officials with our
experience how to protect, instead of ruin lives of children and families like
ours. Kindly review the hardest work of our lives, copies of some evidence of
the abuse and the police vows: "THESE CRIMES ARE NOT GOING TO BE INVESTIGATED!"
at http://fcase.blogharbor.com . An
excerpt from our 1st request for help: "We are convinced that all involved
parties are aware of the fact that current situation presents no benefit to any
involved group. Due to extreme seriousness of situation we would appreciate the
respond from authorities to our request as soon as possible. To continue in our
effort to help our children we would rate highly the opportunity to meet with
authorities, reevaluate the situation, and draw the conclusion, so we can take
the necessary steps to resume our normal lives." Million times betrayed by
other your colleagues, we know you will not betray us, because we know some very
admirable facts about you. Like you, we work hard to be useful to many people.
Maybe it was a destiny that you and we are now in an excellent position to
greatly improve the lives of many children. We just need a little of your help,
in return for our limitless cooperation, as always since the first social worker
left the first of our foster children with us, in the best interest of abused
children. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, Josef and Iva Fisher Unceded
Territory of the Coast Salish Peoples
2006
May 8
Joe Simpson Special Constable Legislative
Assembly Security Services: "Subject: E-Mails sent to legislative human
Resources : "Josef, It would be appreciated if you would be so kind as to
refrain from sending messages to Legislative Human Resources. You have been
sending the same e-mail to them on a daily basis and this has become problematic
with Human Resources in that they have other business to deal with. I would ask
that you call me at 250-387-5555 in order to resolve this issue. If you do not
call be advised that should you continue to send these e-mails then you risk
being investigated criminally for harassment and/or having your e-mail
privileges suspended or revoked by your server."
2007
January 9
The police imprisoned my son for an
outstanding warrant. I gave my son’s lawyer a request to the judge before the
hearing ten days later: "Beside just punishment, however, Yosef also deserves
psychologist’s professional help, which we request. Otherwise, he will never
achieve his dreams to make living as an artist and useful member of society. In
spite of our superhuman efforts, and due to circumstances beyond our control,
Joe is now a homeless drug addict with criminal record and ruined
life."
When my son got another lawyer, I repeated
the same request. Nothing happened. Joe was kept in the solitary confinement.
Because of utter lack of any mental health help during his forty-eight days of
imprisonment, I paid the bail on February 26, 2007. Correctional officers knew
that something was terribly wrong: instead of releasing Joe from prison, the
guards transported him to a nearby hospital. The police twice tasered Joe
exactly one week later, and transported him to the Vancouver General Hospital.
Now he lives in a Group Home. Professionals gave my first-born child the
responsibility to never let me enter that house. Our athletic child who had been
in excellent physical shape, gained more than one hundred pounds during his
first eight months there. And the voices in his head are more frequent and more
troublesome.
Beside you, many people know the F-case
basic facts. Welcome this opportunity to join our Family Doctor and Teachers of
our children in wonderful group of good people who tried to help us. Before the
F-case facts will be publicly known, write ‘I AM SORRY’ into my blog. The second
group of people cooperated to harm us, and the third group of informed
government officials allowed them to do as they wish.
March 19
I distributed copies of the media comment
from March 14, 2005, with a small addendum, to people entering the CBC Head
Quarters. Soon the police arrested me, and at the requests of some of the CBC
employee, policemen took my picture for the CBC use. After long phone calls,
they called an Ambulance, and transported my possessions in their car to St.
Paul Hospital. I was committed for a couple of hours, until the psychiatrist,
Dr. Kerr from my first arrest, arrived. After a 2-3 minutes long assessment,
without any paperwork, he released me. Arresting Officers stole my buss pass and
home keys and accused the paramedics of being responsible for the loss, though
all seized items were transported in their cruiser. The CBC is one of
uninterested addressees of our requests for help. Every nation has the
government and media it deserves.
2008
March 6
BCHRT, Inquiry Officer Cheryl: “RE: End
deadly policies. Choose Life. Or, shake hands with psychopaths. Because the
Tribunal is responsible for accepting, mediating and adjudicating complaints we
must remain unbiased and do not offer advice or opinion, only information. If
you should require any legal assistance or advice it may be available through
the BC Human Rights Coalition."
August 4
VPD Insp. Nelmes confirmed reading the
Subject: ULTIMATUM TO CANADIAN PUBLIC SERVANTS. One week later, Det/Cst Lowe: "I
am currently reviewing all available materials on your blog to familiarize
myself with your case. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions." On
September 24, 2008 at 5:51PM, the Det/Cst wished me: "Good day Mr. Fisher, I
have read the contents of your blog posted at http://fcase.blogharbor.com. If
you are interested, I would still like to meet you in person to discuss this
further with you. Please advise at your convenience." My immediate response:
"Good evening Det/Cst Lowe, You certainly worked long hours overtime to read and
comprehend it all. As you have read, the last time another VPD Det/Cst invited
me to discuss this further and incarcerated me for 30 days in Lunatic Asylums.
Without any court order, as you also have read. You too may be tempted to do
something illegal. To prevent it, and if you are interested, sent me all
questions you want to discuss. I will answer them as best as I can, as soon as
possible, if still possible. Just tell your supervisor who ordered you to
communicate with me that I want his/her name and signature under these
questions, if she/he likes to know my answers."
September 26
"We received a report from the Vancouver
Police Department acting on behalf of the owner of the email
addressswill@direct.ca. The owner of this email address has allegedly sent cease
and desist requests in the past asking that no further emails be sent to it. The
owner claims that the emails continue and we have an example of one such
message. The police have asked that we contact you directly so as to resolve
this issue as peacefully and easily as possible We ask that Mr. Joseph Fisher
refrain from any further email communications with the email address
swill@direct.ca. Future complaints regarding unwanted email communications from
any email address using your internet connection could possibly result in legal
action by the complainant(s) on the grounds of harassment and termination of
internet services by Shaw Cable." The owner was appointed to the Police Board on
June 30, 2008, the contact address is accessible from the "Safe Streets - Safe
Cities" internet report. No government official was ever contacted outside his
office and legal duties.
November 5
About 11 AM Two men in black banged at the
door. I blogged three hours later: "I repeat: if you are interested, sent me all
questions you want to discuss. I will answer them as best as I can. Or, for a
change, do something honorable. Eat your guns for example." Before 3 PM, the
police phoned. After being told to e-mail what they want, they harassed me wife,
lying that Det/Cst. Lowe's e-mails were returned. And let her spell my e-address
letter by letter.
November 9
Published The Last Request For
Help
Government Agents and Agencies:
Many government officials have learnt the
basic F-case facts during the last decade, but none of them halted the
destruction of my family. None of you proclaimed: I AM SORRY. None of you
interrupted ongoing, en masse besmirching of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, impotent to protect 12-years-old child’s rights and freedoms. To deter
others from participating at similar offences, voluntarily sacrifice part of
your annual income for our quick returns to our homelands, for Joe's rest of
life in freedom in Cuba and for me in Europe, above the poverty line if
possible. Taxpayers will certainly appreciate for them zero cost justice,
lifting their burden of paying till the death for the welfare, medical expenses,
correctional services etc. for two members of one family destroyed by their
government. Account No: 210 201 4795 IBAN: CZ 23 2700 0000 002102014795
S.W.I.F.T. Code BACXCZPP When complete, I'll publish The Compassionate List
(first 19 individuals, 19 agencies and the sum donated). Thank you &
farewell, Canada
I escaped to Canada so my family can live
together. After 160 days, the Ministry for Children and Families destroyed my
family. Because of it, on January 8, 1998 we decided to escape again, to live in
Costa Rica as soon as possible. The Government of Canada inhibited that. On
January 5, 2000 I obtained the first proof that the Government will let me die,
rather than admit any wrongdoing. After almost 4000 days I cannot take it
anymore. On Monday morning, I go underground. The Internet connection will be
terminated. Then the streets, buses, Skytrain, ferries, libraries, offices,
courts, schools, Vancouver and surrounding area – became a very dangerous zone.
A man known to the police, who struggles with mental health problems and of
March 2005, threatened to light himself on fire at the CBC Plaza in downtown
Vancouver, is homeless. Desperate, so hated by the Canadian government that
government officials prefer to let him kill small children, rather than admit
wrongdoings. If they do not admit wrongdoing, their wish must be fulfilled. In
order of not escape their punishments, the man must kill. Nobody ever sought
other than this, repeatedly predicted, end of his suffering.
PLEASE, HELP ME! SOMEONE, SOMEWHERE,
SOMEHOW! THANK YOU.
To stop him, advertise in newspapers, radio
reports, in Skytrain, in schools and elsewhere: "Mr. Fisher, I, government
official ---------- , accepted your three demands. Do not kill anyone, please.
Surrender and you will be treated under the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, this time honestly."
December4
The Province
(tabtips@theprovince.com) Re: F-case: Liars, masters of deception,
traitors of the people. That's you. Please, read it again
"Stop sending us this material"
December5
Vancouver Sun, Ms. Wigod, Rebecca
(RWigod@vancouversun.com) RE: F-case
"Please stop sending these
messages!"
Not losing sleep over it at all, night after
night and day after day, government officials are determined to sacrifice human
lives, rather than admit any injustice. The Honourable Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada, April 17, 2002: "Twenty years ago today, the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms became a reality and ushered in a new
era in our system of justice. The Charter has become a living document that
embodies the values Canadians hold dear. According to recent surveys, up to nine
out of ten Canadians see the Charter as a symbol of Canadian identity and
believe it has played a crucial role in protecting our rights and freedoms. The
Charter is a document that is simple in its intent, yet complex in its meaning.
It sets out our rights and freedoms. The Charter outlines our right to vote; the
right to life, liberty and security of the person; equality rights; legal rights
of persons accused of crimes; official languages rights and protection of
multicultural heritage. The Charter also outlines our freedoms, including the
freedom of conscience; freedom of religion; freedom of thought, belief and
opinion; freedom of expression, including freedom of the press; freedom of
peaceful assembly and freedom of association. These are basic tenets in a free
and democratic society. But, with rights come responsibilities. If we aspire to
a society where respect and tolerance thrive, we have to take responsibility for
our actions. Individual rights must be balanced against collective rights. The
Charter is a concrete statement that we accept our responsibilities as citizens
of a great country. We should not take its words for granted. Since its
inception in 1982, the Charter has become a symbol of the values we hold dear
and of what we wish to achieve as a people. Today, more than ever, the Charter
is a source of pride to Canadians. It reflects who we are. It celebrates our
diversity. As the official poster says - The Charter. It's ours. It's
us."
Your words and actions reflect what you
respect, your responsibility, your values, what you wish to achieve and who you
are. Heretofore presented abundant concrete evidence perfectly reflect your
reversed protection of the rights of children. Liars, masters of deception,
traitors of the people. That's you. Please, read it again: "We did nothing wrong
to you or anyone else. Our words and actions reflect what we respect, our
responsibility, our values, what we wish to achieve and who we are. Thank you
for your attention and resulting swift response."
December 11
I expected the arrest, with or without
warrant, at the Vancouver Police HQ. I deserved to be charged under the CCC S.
264.1(3)(b) Uttering Threats, brought before the JP, sign condition of the
"Undertaking", given the trial date and be released on bail. Const. L. Smith
stole my Swiss-army knife instead. At the VGH PAU, 5 shrinks assessed my mental
state for 10 days. No. 3 – the Laughing Cow – exploited my wife’s infinite
goodness, lecturing me about the necessity to forgive; she stated that, if her
daughter was murdered, she would forgive her murderer’s crimes. How can I
forgive anything when evildoers do not repent? I must ask my good friend, former
reverend Eagle Strong Voice and author of "UNREPENTANT"(documentary). No. 4
inquired if I am a fascist, disapprovingly watching flashing Nazi/Canadian
Flags, decorated by Dr. Goebbels' ”THE TRUTH IS THE WORST ENEMY OF THE STATE”
words. She then offered me to be drugged against my will.
December 18
Shrink No. 5 executed the No. 4’s offer.
Since then, I am receiving higher and higher doses of Risperidone. (Your doctor
has prescribed this medication because he or she has judged that the benefit to
you is greater than the risk of side effects.) Risperidone is used to treat
certain mental/mood disorders (schizophrenia, manic phase of bipolar disorder,
irritability associated with autistic disorder). Feeding higher and higher doses
of that shit to mentally healthy people is another Great Canadian
Experiment.
Eagle Strong Voice: “On Christmas Eve, 1946,
a fourteen year old aboriginal girl named Maisie Shaw from Port Renfrew, B.C.,
was kicked to her death down a flight of stairs at the United Church Alberni
Indian Residential School. Her murderer was school principal and clergyman
Alfred Caldwell. The murder was witnessed by Harriett Nahanee. Caldwell was
never brought to trial. The RCMP still refuses to investigate her death, and
have even issued a fake death certificate that claims that Maisie died of "heart
failure", even though the RCMP also told her parents that she was "hit by a
train". Both the United Church and the RCMP continue to cover-up and deny her
murder - and refuse to reveal where she is buried. Small wonder. For Maisie Shaw
is an enduring symbol of more than 50,000 aboriginal children who never came
back from church-run residential schools across Canada, having been killed or
died from deliberate exposure to diseases and tortures by school staff. We must
not let those who killed Maisie, and all of these innocent children, get away
with their crimes. We must hold them accountable, on behalf of those, like
Maisie, who cannot speak.” (http://www.hiddenfromhistory.org)
December 25
Before returning to VGH, at 3:15 pm I saw
two suns and stood between two spirits. They lead me in front of the Anglican
Church Of Canada at W. Georgia, where for the last time I stood beside Harriet,
recently murdered by Canadian Justus. They then lead me to learn a native
prayer, and back, to say that prayer. The Czech translation:
Přijdi,
Duchu!
Ty jehož noci jsou
dny
a jehož dny jsou
nocemi
v tomto Velikém
Domě.
Prosím tě, Veliký
Uzdravující,
smiluj se nad
námi
a vrat´ nás
životu!
Hadleyburg No.2
Vancouver General Hospital
December 31, 2008
Prisoner of Conscience
04746160
To: All whom it should concern
From: Iva Fisher
Our plans to leave Canada forever recently changed. Our two children wish to remain in Canada. I will stay with them. My husband did not commit any crime and he is not mentally ill. He cannot function as a husband and father. He is for years all days and nights busy to fight injustices, responding at every question and issue: “I must leave this stolen cursed land.” Since we were falsely accused, he does not consider Canada his home, and he never will. I respect his distressed protest of being homeless.
